How do uncertainties in hurricane model forecasts affect storm surge predictions in a semi-enclosed bay?

被引:46
|
作者
Zhong, Liejun [1 ]
Li, Ming [1 ]
Zhang, Da-Lin [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Horn Point Lab, Ctr Environm Sci, Cambridge, MD 21613 USA
[2] Univ Maryland, Dept Atmospher & Ocean Sci, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
storm surge; hurricane; tropical cyclone; sensitivity analysis; Chesapeake Bay; CHESAPEAKE BAY; WIND FIELDS; NORTH-SEA; SYSTEM; INUNDATION; ESTUARY; SURFACE; TIDE; RESOLUTION; STRESS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecss.2010.07.001
中图分类号
Q17 [水生生物学];
学科分类号
071004 ;
摘要
With the increasing demand for accurate storm surge predictions in coastal regions, there is an urgent need to understand and quantify how the predictive skill of the hydrodynamic model is affected by various uncertainties in the atmospheric model forecasts for hurricanes. In this study, a series of numerical sensitivity experiments is conducted for the storm surge in a semi-enclosed Chesapeake Bay generated during the passage of Hurricane Isabel (2003). It is found that the predicted storm surge is sensitive to errors in predicting the hurricane's track, intensity and propagation speed. The surge height is more sensitive to the wind forcing in the upper Bay than in the lower Bay due to different response mechanisms in the two regions. Errors in the translation speed change the prediction of not only the surge height, but also its arriving time and duration of high water, whereas errors in the hurricane track and intensity mainly affect the model prediction on the surge height. In addition, the storm surge prediction is more sensitive to the spatial than temporal resolution of the predicted horizontal wind field. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:61 / 72
页数:12
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Typhoon parameter sensitivity of storm surge in the semi-enclosed Tokyo Bay
    Md. Rezuanul Islam
    Hiroshi Takagi
    [J]. Frontiers of Earth Science, 2020, 14 : 553 - 567
  • [2] Typhoon parameter sensitivity of storm surge in the semi-enclosed Tokyo Bay
    Islam, Md. Rezuanul
    Takagi, Hiroshi
    [J]. FRONTIERS OF EARTH SCIENCE, 2020, 14 (03) : 553 - 567
  • [3] Hurricane-induced storm surges, currents and destratification in a semi-enclosed bay
    Li, M
    Zhong, LJ
    Boicourt, WC
    Zhang, SL
    Zhang, DL
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2006, 33 (02)
  • [4] Discrepancies on Storm Surge Predictions by Parametric Wind Model and Numerical Weather Prediction Model in a Semi-Enclosed Bay: Case Study of Typhoon Haiyan
    Tsai, Yu-Lin
    Wu, Tso-Ren
    Lin, Chuan-Yao
    Lin, Simon C.
    Yen, Eric
    Lin, Chun-Wei
    [J]. WATER, 2020, 12 (12)
  • [5] PREDICTIONS OF ECOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF ARTIFICIAL UPWELLING IN SEMI-ENCLOSED BAY AND ENCLOSED LAKE
    Sato, Toru
    Mizumukai, Kentaro
    Lin, Chun-ju
    Tabeta, Shigeru
    Kitazawa, Daisuke
    [J]. OMAE 2009, VOL 4, PTS A AND B, 2009, : 461 - 467
  • [6] A simplified real time method to forecast semi-enclosed basins storm surge
    Pasquali, D.
    Di Risio, M.
    De Girolamo, P.
    [J]. ESTUARINE COASTAL AND SHELF SCIENCE, 2015, 165 : 61 - 69
  • [7] A numerical study of vegetation impact on reducing storm surge by wetlands in a semi-enclosed estuary
    Hu, Kelin
    Chen, Qin
    Wang, Hongqing
    [J]. COASTAL ENGINEERING, 2015, 95 : 66 - 76
  • [8] A simplified hindcast method for the estimation of extreme storm surge events in semi-enclosed basins
    Pasquali, D.
    Bruno, M. F.
    Celli, D.
    Damiani, L.
    Di Risio, M.
    [J]. APPLIED OCEAN RESEARCH, 2019, 85 : 45 - 52
  • [9] Do habitat, month and environmental parameters affect shrimp assemblage in a shallow semi-enclosed tropical bay, Thailand?
    Hajisamae, Sukree
    Yeesin, Pun
    [J]. RAFFLES BULLETIN OF ZOOLOGY, 2014, 62 : 107 - 114
  • [10] Field Surveys and Numerical Simulation of the 2018 Typhoon Jebi: Impact of High Waves and Storm Surge in Semi-enclosed Osaka Bay, Japan
    Tuan Anh Le
    Hiroshi Takagi
    Mohammad Heidarzadeh
    Yoshihumi Takata
    Atsuhei Takahashi
    [J]. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 2019, 176 : 4139 - 4160