Prospective randomized trial of woven versus collagen-impregnated knitted prosthetic Dacron grafts in aortoiliac surgery

Background Despite the theoretical advantages of coating knitted grafts with a material designed to reduce blood loss, their performance has not been directly compared with woven grafts in a prospective randomized trial. The aim of this study was to compare the graft handling qualities and operative blood loss of the two types of arterial prosthesis, as well as complication rate and patient survival at 1 year. Methods A total of 267 consecutive patients having surgery for occlusive or aneurysmal disease of the aortoiliac arteries were randomized to receive woven (141 patients) or knitted collagen-impregnated Dacron (126 patients) grafts. Graft patency was assessed on discharge and at 1 year by duplex imaging. Results Mean(s.d.) intraoperative blood loss was statistically greater with woven grafts (1690(1424) mi) compared with knitted (1363(1172) mi) (P = 0.049). An insignificant 1-year increase in mean(s.d.) graft diameter of 1.2(0.2)mm was found at the distal anastomosis in the knitted group. There was no difference in graft patency between the groups and only one graft became infected. Conclusion This study suggests that knitted and woven grafts have similar clinical performance and therefore the less expensive material (woven) should usually be selected unless haemorrhagic complications are anticipated.