Selecting and applying indicators of ecosystem collapse for risk assessments

被引:32
|
作者
Rowland, Jessica A. [1 ]
Nicholson, Emily [1 ]
Murray, Nicholas J. [2 ]
Keith, David A. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Lester, Rebecca E. [5 ]
Bland, Lucie M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Deakin Univ, Sch Life & Environm Sci, Ctr Integrat Ecol, Burwood, Vic 3125, Australia
[2] Univ New South Wales, Sch Biol Earth & Environm Sci, Ctr Ecosyst Sci, Kensington, NSW 2052, Australia
[3] New South Wales Off Environm & Heritage, Hurstville, NSW 2220, Australia
[4] Australian Natl Univ, Long Term Ecol Res Network, Terr Ecosyst Res Network, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
[5] Deakin Univ, Ctr Reg & Rural Futures, Geelong, Vic 3220, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
collapse; indicator selection; IUCN Red List of Ecosystems; CLIMATE; CONSERVATION; BIODIVERSITY; FRAMEWORK; FOREST; ELICITATION; CRITERIA; HELP;
D O I
10.1111/cobi.13107
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Ongoing ecosystem degradation and transformation are major threats to biodiversity. Measuring ecosystem change toward collapse relies on monitoring indicators that quantify key ecological processes. Yet little guidance is available on selection and use of indicators for ecosystem risk assessment. We reviewed indicator use in ecological studies of ecosystem collapse in marine pelagic and temperate forest ecosystems. We examined indicator-selection methods, indicator types (geographic distribution, abiotic, biotic), methods of assessing multiple indicators, and temporal quality of time series. We compared how these factors were applied in the ecological studies with how they were applied in risk assessments by using the International Union for Conservation of Nature's Red List of Ecosystems (RLE), for which indicators are used to estimate risk of ecosystem collapse. Ecological studies and RLE assessments rarely reported how indicators were selected, particularly in terrestrial ecosystems. Few ecological studies and RLE assessments quantified ecosystem change based on all 3 indicator types, and indicators types used differed between marine and terrestrial ecosystems. Several studies used indices or multivariate analyses to assess multiple indicators simultaneously, but RLE assessments did not because as RLE guidelines advise against them. Most studies and RLE assessments used time-series data that spanned at least 30 years, which increases the probability of reliably detecting change. Limited use of indicator-selection protocols and infrequent use of all 3 indicator types may hamper accurate detection of change. To improve the value of risk assessments for informing policy and management, we recommend using explicit protocols, including conceptual models, to identify and select indicators; a range of indicators spanning distributional, abiotic, and biotic features; indices and multivariate analyses with extreme care until guidelines are developed; time series with sufficient data to increase ability to accurately diagnose directional change; data from multiple sources to support assessments; and explicitly reporting steps in the assessment process.
引用
收藏
页码:1233 / 1245
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Strengthening the Scientific Basis of Ecosystem Collapse Risk Assessments
    Newton, Adrian C.
    LAND, 2021, 10 (11)
  • [2] SELECTING BIOLOGICAL INDICATORS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL-DAMAGE ASSESSMENTS
    SIMONS, LH
    NORTHWEST ENVIRONMENTAL JOURNAL, 1992, 8 (01): : 220 - 222
  • [3] Applying ecosystem services for pre-market environmental risk assessments of regulated stressors
    Devos, Yann
    Munns, Wayne R., Jr.
    Forbes, Valery E.
    Maltby, Lorraine
    Stenseke, Marie
    Brussaard, Lijbert
    Streissl, Franz
    Hardy, Anthony
    EFSA JOURNAL, 2019, 17
  • [4] A neural network approach to selecting indicators for a sustainable ecosystem
    Rowland, J
    Andrews, WS
    Creber, KAM
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE, 2004, 3 : S129 - S136
  • [5] Florida lagoon at risk of ecosystem collapse
    Adams, Douglas H.
    Tremain, Derek M.
    Paperno, Richard
    Sonne, Christian
    SCIENCE, 2019, 365 (6457) : 991 - 992
  • [6] Assessing risk of estuarine ecosystem collapse
    Mahoney, P. C.
    Bishop, M. J.
    OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2017, 140 : 46 - 58
  • [7] Indicators of uncertainty in chemical risk assessments
    Levin, R
    Hansson, SO
    Rudén, C
    REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2004, 39 (01) : 33 - 43
  • [8] A framework for integrating ecosystem services indicators into vulnerability and risk assessments of deltaic social-ecological systems
    Peng, Yuting
    Welden, Natalie
    Renaud, Fabrice G.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2023, 326
  • [9] Applying industrial ecosystem indicators: case of Pielinen Karelia, Finland
    Okkonen, Lasse
    CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 2008, 10 (04) : 327 - 339
  • [10] Applying industrial ecosystem indicators: case of Pielinen Karelia, Finland
    Lasse Okkonen
    Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 2008, 10 : 327 - 339