The safety of planned home birth: some considerations from a qualitative study

被引:0
|
作者
Rico Becerra, Juan Ignacio [1 ]
Sanchez Navarro, Maria del Carmen [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Murcia, Dept Enfermeria, Murcia, Spain
[2] Serv Murciano Salud, Murcia, Spain
来源
CULTURA DE LOS CUIDADOS | 2022年 / 26卷 / 62期
关键词
Physiological birth; medicalization (obstetric interventionism); safety; planned home birth;
D O I
10.14198/cuid.2022.62.16
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Introduction: The search for safety also involves risks caused by the devices that are created to anticipate and control them. This is the case of unnecessary interventionism in hospital births in relation to planned home deliveries. Objectives: To explore the relationship between physiological delivery and obstetric interventionism, and to examine the debate on the safety of home delivery and its main repercussions. Methodology: Qualitative research. Collection of information with a questionnaire of open questions completed in writing by 45 women who gave birth at home in the province of Murcia between 2008 and 2017. For its analysis MAXQDA qualitative data analysis software was used. Results: obstetric interventionism hinders the physiological delivery process; The debate over the safety of planned home birth is polarized, causing various repercussions for those involved. Conclusions: planned home birth in low-risk women favors the development of physiological delivery, which avoids many of the unnecessary obstetric interventions associated in hospitals; Likewise, the polarized debate on the safety of childbirth at home does not provide consensual information, which has repercussions on the different positioning of the two health groups that take care of childbirth (gynecologists and midwives), and on the fact that women who decide to perform the home births are pressurized by multiple sources (health system, family members, friends ...) that come face to face with the relevant information available to them about home birth and the support of the professional who accompanies them in the birth.
引用
收藏
页码:225 / 243
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Safety of planned home birth is not supported by evidence
    Pesce, Andrew
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2009, 49 (03): : 340 - 340
  • [2] Planned hospital birth versus planned home birth
    Olsen, Ole
    Clausen, Jette A.
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2012, (09):
  • [3] Planned home birth
    Dickens, Bernard
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2013, 120 (02) : 204 - 205
  • [4] Planned Home Birth
    Simpson, Kathleen Rice
    [J]. MCN-THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-CHILD NURSING, 2013, 38 (05) : 326 - 326
  • [5] Planned Home Birth
    Watterberg, Kristi
    [J]. PEDIATRICS IN REVIEW, 2021, 42 (09) : 526 - 528
  • [6] Planned Home Birth
    Wax, Joseph R.
    Barth, William H., Jr.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 129 (04): : E117 - E122
  • [7] Planned home birth
    Walker, James Johnston
    [J]. BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2017, 43 : 76 - 86
  • [8] Home birth is unsafe: FOR: The safety of planned homebirths: a clinical fiction
    Gruenebaum, Amos
    McCullough, Laurence B.
    Arabin, Birgit
    Brent, Robert L.
    Levene, Malcolm I.
    Chervenak, Frank A.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2015, 122 (09) : 1235 - 1235
  • [9] Utah obstetricians' opinions of planned home birth and conflicting NICE/ACOG guidelines: A qualitative study
    Rainey, Emily
    Simonsen, Sara
    Stanford, Joseph
    Shoaf, Kimberley
    Baayd, Jami
    [J]. BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE, 2017, 44 (02): : 137 - 144
  • [10] Birth Preferences that Deviate from the Norm in Sweden: Planned Home Birth versus Planned Cesarean Section
    Hildingsson, Ingegerd
    Radestad, Ingela
    Lindgren, Helena
    [J]. BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE, 2010, 37 (04): : 288 - 295