Supporting the Bidding Decisions of Smallholder Farmers in Public Calls in Brazil

被引:4
|
作者
Alves Junior, Paulo Nocera [1 ,2 ]
Costa Melo, Isotilia [2 ,3 ]
Yamanaka, Lie [4 ]
Severino, Maico Roris [4 ]
Rentizelas, Athanasios [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Catol Norte UCN, Escuela Ingn Coquimbo EIC, Coquimbo 1781421, Chile
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Sao Carlos Sch Engn EESC, BR-13562190 Sao Carlos, Brazil
[3] Univ Adolfo Ibanez UAI, Fac Ingn Ciencias, Vina Del Mar 2520000, Chile
[4] Fed Univ Goias UFG, Fac Sci & Technol, BR-74968755 Aparecida De Goiania, Brazil
[5] Natl Tech Univ Athens, Sch Mech Engn, Sector Ind Management & Operat Res, Zografos 15780, Greece
[6] Univ Strathclyde, Dept Design Mfg & Engn Management, Glasgow G1 1XJ, Lanark, Scotland
来源
AGRICULTURE-BASEL | 2022年 / 12卷 / 01期
关键词
smallholder farmers; bid; no-bid decisions; institutional markets; Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA); Slack-Based Measure (SBM); hierarchical network systems; DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; SLACKS-BASED MEASURE; BID/NO-BID DECISION; SUPER-EFFICIENCY; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.3390/agriculture12010048
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
In Brazil, the National School Feeding Program (PNAE) seeks to contribute to the socio-economic development of smallholder farmers, prioritizing them in supplying their products for preparing daily meals in public schools. However, farmers face challenges in determining which school calls to bid for and the potential benefits from their participation, due to the multiple quantitative and qualitative decision criteria involved. This paper presents a novel Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA)-based method for bidding priority setting, to support the decision making. The model was applied for a case study in Brazil. The academic contribution lies in the innovation of using a Double-Frontier Slack-Based Measure (SBM) DEA model for Hierarchical Network systems, i.e., applied to multiple levels and followed by a tie-breaking method. The practical contribution lies in the decision support of farmers by presenting the results at three levels, the first of which is a ranking by the town or urban cluster priority, the second by the school, and the third by the products. Thus, using the rankings of calls, farmers can make informed decisions regarding the feasibility of bidding for each PNAE public call. At the same time, the objective rankings can alleviate friction and conflict within co-operatives during the decision-making process.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Supporting Brazilian smallholder farmers decision making in supplying institutional markets
    Fuchigami, Helio Yochihiro
    Tuni, Andrea
    Barbosa, Luisa Queiroz
    Severino, Maico Roris
    Rentizelas, Athanasios
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2021, 295 (01) : 321 - 335
  • [2] Post-production decisions in agriculture: understanding postharvest storage and marketing decisions of smallholder farmers
    Priya, Preeti
    Mitra, Suddhachit
    [J]. FOOD SECURITY, 2020, 12 (06) : 1317 - 1329
  • [3] Post-production decisions in agriculture: understanding postharvest storage and marketing decisions of smallholder farmers
    Preeti Priya
    Suddhachit Mitra
    [J]. Food Security, 2020, 12 : 1317 - 1329
  • [4] Understanding the Implications of Alternative Bioenergy Crops to Support Smallholder Farmers in Brazil
    Sakai, Paola
    Afionis, Stavros
    Favretto, Nicola
    Stringer, Lindsay C.
    Ward, Caroline
    Sakai, Marco
    Weirich Neto, Pedro Henrique
    Rocha, Carlos Hugo
    Gomes, Jaime Alberti
    de Souza, Natali Maidl
    Afzal, Nouman
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (05) : 1 - 22
  • [5] Determinants of smallholder farmers' decisions on fertilizer use for cereal crops in the Ethiopian highlands
    Tefera, Tewodros
    Elias, Eyasu
    van Beek, Christy
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURE, 2020, 56 (05) : 677 - 687
  • [6] A Double Hurdle Estimation of Sales Decisions by Smallholder Beef Cattle Farmers in Eswatini
    Dlamini, Sicelo Ignatius
    Huang, Wen-Chi
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (19)
  • [7] Smallholder rice farmers' post-harvest decisions: preferences and structural factors
    Ruhinduka, Remidius Denis
    Alem, Yonas
    Eggert, Hakan
    Lybbert, Travis
    [J]. EUROPEAN REVIEW OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2020, 47 (04) : 1587 - 1620
  • [8] Changing systems for supporting farmers' decisions: problems, paradigms, and prospects
    McCown, RL
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2002, 74 (01) : 179 - 220
  • [9] Brucellosis among smallholder cattle farmers in Zambia Public health significance
    Muma, John Bwalya
    Pandey, Girja Shankar
    Munyeme, Musso
    Mumba, Chisoni
    Mkandawire, Ethel
    Chimana, Henry Mwelwa
    [J]. TROPICAL ANIMAL HEALTH AND PRODUCTION, 2012, 44 (04) : 915 - 920
  • [10] Animal-source food legislation as a tool for the exclusion of smallholder farmers in Brazil
    Nogueira Silva, Naaman Francisco
    Santana de Lelis, Davi Augusto
    de Carvalho, Antonio Fernandes
    [J]. NATURE FOOD, 2022, 3 (04): : 237 - 240