On the structure of dynamic principal component analysis used in statistical process monitoring

被引:68
|
作者
Vanhatalo, Erik [1 ]
Kulahci, Murat [1 ,2 ]
Bergquist, Bjarne [1 ]
机构
[1] Lulea Univ Technol, SE-97187 Lulea, Sweden
[2] Tech Univ Denmark, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
Dynamic principal component analysis; Vector autoregressive process; Vector moving average process; Autocorrelation; Simulation; Tennessee Eastman process simulator; IDENTIFICATION; DISTURBANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.chemolab.2017.05.016
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
When principal component analysis (PCA) is used for statistical process monitoring it relies on the assumption that data are time independent. However, industrial data will often exhibit serial correlation. Dynamic PCA (DPCA) has been suggested as a remedy for high-dimensional and time-dependent data. In DPCA the input matrix is augmented by adding time-lagged values of the variables. In building a DPCA model the analyst needs to decide on (1) the number of lags to add, and (2) given a specific lag structure, how many principal components to retain. In this article we propose a new analyst driven method to determine the maximum number of lags in DPCA with a foundation in multivariate time series analysis. The method is based on the behavior of the eigenvalues of the lagged autocorrelation and partial autocorrelation matrices. Given a specific lag structure we also propose a method for determining the number of principal components to retain. The number of retained principal components is determined by visual inspection of the serial correlation in the squared prediction error statistic, Q (SPE), together with the cumulative explained variance of the model. The methods are illustrated using simulated vector autoregressive and moving average data, and tested on Tennessee Eastman process data.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 11
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Sparse dynamic inner principal component analysis for process monitoring
    Guo, Lingling
    Wu, Ping
    Lou, Siwei
    Gao, Jinfeng
    [J]. 2019 CHINESE AUTOMATION CONGRESS (CAC2019), 2019, : 1542 - 1547
  • [2] Nonlinear Statistical Process Monitoring based on Competitive Principal Component Analysis
    Ramdani, Messaoud
    Mendaci, Khaled
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 8TH CONFERENCE OF THE EUROPEAN SOCIETY FOR FUZZY LOGIC AND TECHNOLOGY (EUSFLAT-13), 2013, 32 : 752 - 757
  • [3] Multivariate statistical process monitoring based on principal discriminative component analysis
    Li, Shanzhi
    Chen, Yang
    Tong, Chudong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE FRANKLIN INSTITUTE-ENGINEERING AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS, 2021, 358 (15): : 7900 - 7915
  • [4] Nonlinear dynamic process monitoring using deep dynamic principal component analysis
    Li, Simin
    Yang, Shuanghua
    Cao, Yi
    Ji, Zuzen
    [J]. SYSTEMS SCIENCE & CONTROL ENGINEERING, 2022, 10 (01) : 55 - 64
  • [5] Adaptive kernel principal component analysis for nonlinear dynamic process monitoring
    Chouaib, Chakour
    Mohamed-Faouzi, Harkat
    Messaoud, Djeghaba
    [J]. 2013 9TH ASIAN CONTROL CONFERENCE (ASCC), 2013,
  • [6] A new multivariate statistical process monitoring method using principal component analysis
    Kano, M
    Hasebe, S
    Hashimoto, I
    Ohno, H
    [J]. COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2001, 25 (7-8) : 1103 - 1113
  • [7] Multivariate Statistical Process Monitoring Using Robust Nonlinear Principal Component Analysis
    赵仕健
    徐用懋
    [J]. Tsinghua Science and Technology, 2005, (05) : 582 - 586
  • [8] Kernel principal component analysis with reduced complexity for nonlinear dynamic process monitoring
    Jaffel, Ines
    Taouali, Okba
    Harkat, Mohamed Faouzi
    Messaoud, Hassani
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 88 (9-12): : 3265 - 3279
  • [9] Nonlinear dynamic principal component analysis for on-line process monitoring and diagnosis
    Lin, WL
    Qian, Y
    Li, XX
    [J]. COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2000, 24 (2-7) : 423 - 429
  • [10] Kernel principal component analysis with reduced complexity for nonlinear dynamic process monitoring
    Ines Jaffel
    Okba Taouali
    Mohamed Faouzi Harkat
    Hassani Messaoud
    [J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2017, 88 : 3265 - 3279