Higher Adenoma Detection Rates with Endocuff-Assisted Colonoscopy - A Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trial

被引:93
|
作者
Floer, Martin [1 ]
Biecker, Erwin [2 ,5 ]
Fitzlaff, Ruediger [3 ]
Roeming, Hermann [1 ]
Ameis, Detlev [3 ]
Heinecke, Achim [4 ]
Kunsch, Steffen [6 ]
Ellenrieder, Volker [6 ]
Stroebel, Philipp [7 ]
Schepke, Michael [2 ]
Meister, Tobias [1 ]
机构
[1] HELIOS Albert Schweitzer Hosp Northeim, Dept Gastroenterol, Northeim, Germany
[2] HELIOS Med Ctr Siegburg, Siegburg, Germany
[3] HELIOS St Marienberg Hosp Helmstedt, Helmstedt, Germany
[4] Univ Munster, Inst Biostat & Clin Res, D-48149 Munster, Germany
[5] Zollernalb Med Ctr, Dept Gastroenterol, Bailingen, Germany
[6] Univ Med Ctr Gottingen, Dept Gastroenterol 2, Gottingen, Germany
[7] Univ Med Ctr Gottingen, Inst Pathol, Gottingen, Germany
来源
PLOS ONE | 2014年 / 9卷 / 12期
关键词
COLORECTAL-CANCER; ENDOSCOPY; QUALITY; COLON; WITHDRAWAL; MORTALITY; EVALUATE; PROGRAM; IMPACT; RISK;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0114267
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Objectives: The Endocuff is a device mounted on the tip of the colonoscope to help flatten the colonic folds during withdrawal. This study aimed to compare the adenoma detection rates between Endocuff-assisted (EC) colonoscopy and standard colonoscopy (SC). Methods: This randomized prospective multicenter trial was conducted at four academic endoscopy units in Germany. Participants: 500 patients (235 males, median age 64[IQR 54-73]) for colon adenoma detection purposes were included in the study. All patients were either allocated to EC or SC. The primary outcome measure was the determination of the adenoma detection rates (ADR). Results: The ADR significantly increased with the use of the Endocuff compared to standard colonoscopy (35.4%[95% confidence interval{CI} 29-41%] vs. 20.7%[95% CI 15-26%], p<0.0001). Significantly more sessile polyps were detected by EC. Overall procedure time and withdrawal time did not differ. Caecal and ileum intubation rates were similar. No major adverse events occurred in both groups. In multivariate analysis, age (odds ratio [OR] 1.03; 95%[CI] 1.01-1.05), male sex (OR 1.74; 95% CI 1.10-2.73), withdrawal time (OR 1.16; 95% CI 1.05-1.30), procedure time (OR 1.07; 95% CI 1.04-1.10), colon cleanliness (OR 0.60; 95% CI 0.39-0.94) and use of Endocuff (OR 2.09; 95% CI 1.34-3.27) were independent predictors of adenoma detection rates. Conclusions: EC increases the adenoma detection rate by 14.7%(95% CI 6.9-22.5%). EC is safe, effective, easy to handle and might reduce colorectal interval carcinomas.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] ADENOMA DETECTION WITH ENDOCUFF-ASSISTED COLONOSCOPY: A RANDOMIZED, CONTROLLED PILOT STUDY
    Lasa, Juan S.
    Torella, Constanza
    Berman, Saul S.
    Di Paola, Leandro E.
    Caniggia, Diego
    Butierrez, Federico
    Jeannot, Joaquin
    Ahumada, Maria C.
    Zagalsky, David H.
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2018, 87 (06) : AB471 - AB471
  • [2] Comparison of colon adenoma detection rates using cap-assisted and Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial
    Marsano, Joseph
    Johnson, Sheeva
    Yan, Stephanie
    Alli-Akintade, Latifat
    Wilson, Machelle
    Al-Juburi, Amar
    Stondell, Jesse
    Tejaswi, Sooraj
    [J]. ENDOSCOPY INTERNATIONAL OPEN, 2019, 7 (12) : E1585 - E1591
  • [3] ENDOCUFF-ASSISTED COLONOSCOPY: A USEFUL ACCESSORY TO IMPROVE ADENOMA DETECTION RATE IN SCREENING COLONOSCOPY? A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
    Alicante, S.
    De Grazia, F.
    Manfredi, G.
    Lupinacci, G.
    Londoni, C.
    Menozzi, F.
    Brambilla, G.
    Vattiato, C.
    Giunta, M.
    Buscarini, E.
    [J]. DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2017, 49 : E80 - E81
  • [4] Higher Adenoma Detection Rate With Endocuff-Assisted Colonoscopy in a Screening Population
    Cavallaro, Lucas G.
    Lecis, Pierenrico
    Galliani, Ermenegildo
    Dal Pont, Elisabetta
    Giacomin, Anna
    Mel, Rosanna
    Di Camillo, Sabrina
    Soppelsa, Fabio
    Roldo, Claudia
    Iuzzolino, Paolo
    Germana, Bastianello
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2016, 83 (05) : AB380 - AB380
  • [5] Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy for surveillance of serrated polyposis syndrome: a multicenter randomized controlled trial
    Rivero-Sanchez, Liseth
    Lopez Vicente, Jorge
    Hernandez Villalba, Luis
    Puig, Ignasi
    Arnau-Colle, Coral
    Moreno, Lorena
    Diaz, Mireia
    Rodriguez de Miguel, Cristina
    Ocana, Teresa
    Moreira, Leticia
    Cuatrecasas, Miriam
    Carballal, Sabela
    Sanchez, Ariadna
    Ortiz, Oswaldo
    Llach, Josep
    Balaguer, Francesc
    Pellise, Maria
    [J]. ENDOSCOPY, 2019, 51 (07) : 637 - 645
  • [6] The Efficacy of Endocuff-Assisted Colonoscopy in Adenoma Detection: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Jaruvongvanich, Veeravich
    Poonsombudlert, Kittika
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2018, 113 : S452 - S453
  • [7] Adenoma detection by Endocuff-assisted versus standard colonoscopy in an organized screening program: the "ItaVision" randomized controlled trial
    Zorzi, Manuel
    Hassan, Cesare
    Battagello, Jessica
    Antonelli, Giulio
    Pantalena, Maurizio
    Bulighin, Gianmarco
    Alicante, Saverio
    Meggiato, Tamara
    Rosa-Rizzotto, Erik
    Iacopini, Federico
    Luigiano, Carmelo
    Monica, Fabio
    Arrigoni, Arrigo
    Germana, Bastianello
    Valiante, Flavio
    Mallardi, Beatrice
    Senore, Carlo
    Grazzini, Grazia
    Mantellini, Paola
    [J]. ENDOSCOPY, 2022, 54 (02) : 138 - 147
  • [9] HIGHER ADENOMA DETECTION RATE BUT NOT ADVANCED ADENOMA WITH ENDOCUFF-ASSISTED COLONOSCOPY IN A SCREENING POPULATION
    Cavallaro, L.
    Lecis, P.
    Galliani, E.
    Dal Pont, E.
    Giacomin, A.
    Iuzzolino, P.
    Macri, E.
    Roldo, C.
    Soppelsa, F.
    Camillo, S.
    Mel, R.
    Bastianello, G.
    [J]. DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2016, 48 : E171 - E171
  • [10] Randomized control trial of adenoma detection rate in Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy versus transparent hood-assisted colonoscopy
    Imaeda, Hiroyuki
    Yamaoka, Minoru
    Ohgo, Hideki
    Soma, Hiromitsu
    Ashitani, Keigo
    Miyaguchi, Kazuya
    Tsuzuki, Yoshikazu
    Hosoe, Naoki
    Nakamoto, Hidetomo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2019, 34 (09) : 1492 - 1496