Dynamic server placement in edge computing toward Internet of Vehicles

被引:42
|
作者
Shen, Bowen [1 ]
Xu, Xiaolong [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Qi, Lianyong [5 ]
Zhang, Xuyun [6 ]
Srivastava, Gautam [7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Sch Comp & Software, Nanjing 210044, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Jiangsu Engn Ctr Network Monitoring, Nanjing 210044, Peoples R China
[3] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Jiangsu Collaborat Innovat Ctr Atmospher Environm, Nanjing 210044, Peoples R China
[4] Minist Educ, Engn Res Ctr Digital Forens, Nanjing 210044, Peoples R China
[5] Qufu Normal Univ, Sch Informat Sci & Engn, Jining, Peoples R China
[6] Macquarie Univ, Dept Comp, N Ryde, NSW, Australia
[7] Brandon Univ, Dept Math & Comp Sci, 270 18th St, Brandon, MB, Canada
[8] China Med Univ, Res Ctr Interneural Comp, Taichung 40402, Taiwan
关键词
Internet of Vehicles; Edge server placement; Evolutionary multi-objective optimization; Bipartite graph matching; CLOUD;
D O I
10.1016/j.comcom.2021.07.021
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Facing serious challenges in bandwidth and delay, currently adopted cloud computing is no longer effective for providing real-time Internet of Vehicles (IoV) services in the intelligent transportation system (ITS). A newly introduced computing paradigm with a distributed feature, i.e., edge computing, can be a complement to the centralized cloud computing with computation offloaded to the distributed edge servers (ESs). Typically, edge servers are the host of IoV services in edge computing, which requires an appropriate quantification and placement before the implementation of computation offloading. To pursue a higher quality of service (QoS), the quantity and locations of the ESs need to be thoroughly discussed ahead. Otherwise, additional delay and network congestion will occur. Simultaneously, as the ITS is continuously developing, the existing placement of ESs ought to be adjusted to be in line with the dynamic change of IoV traffic. However, ES placement schemes are often devised by clustering methods with a fixed ES quantity and are unaware of the extensibility of the placement. To address the problems that mentioned, a dynamic ES placement approach (DEP) is developed. Technically, DEP leverages the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm III (NSGA-III) for placements with better performance and less reconstruction of existing placement. The population of NSGAIII is initialized with clustering algorithms for a higher accuracy and convergence speed, and the fitness of minimum reconstruction cost is calculated based on Kuhn-Munkres bipartite graph matching algorithm. A real world traffic data with 436 deployed roadside units in the provincial capital city Nanjing, China, is leveraged for comparative experiments. The experimental results verify the effectiveness of DEP with a 17.64% lower latency and 25.82% lower workload standard deviation comparing to the clustering method.
引用
收藏
页码:114 / 123
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Exploiting Edge Computing in Internet of Space Things Networks: Dynamic and Static Server Placement
    Yan, Zhibo
    de Cola, Tomaso
    Zhao, Kanglian
    Li, Wenfeng
    Du, Sidan
    Yang, Hong
    [J]. 2021 IEEE 94TH VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE (VTC2021-FALL), 2021,
  • [2] Quantified Edge Server Placement With Quantum Encoding in Internet of Vehicles
    Zhang, Jie
    Lu, Jiawei
    Yan, Xuan
    Xu, Xiaolong
    Qi, Lianyong
    Dou, Wanchun
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, 2022, 23 (07) : 9370 - 9379
  • [3] Dynamic Edge Server Placement for Computation Offloading in Vehicular Edge Computing
    Nakrani, Dhruv
    Khuman, Jayesh
    Yadav, Ram Narayan
    [J]. 2023 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION NETWORKING, ICOIN, 2023, : 45 - 50
  • [4] Edge server placement in mobile edge computing
    Wang, Shangguang
    Zhao, Yali
    Xu, Jinlinag
    Yuan, Jie
    Hsu, Ching-Hsien
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PARALLEL AND DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING, 2019, 127 : 160 - 168
  • [5] Robust Server Placement for Edge Computing
    Lu, Dongyu
    Qu, Yuben
    Wu, Fan
    Dai, Haipeng
    Dong, Chao
    Chen, Guihai
    [J]. 2020 IEEE 34TH INTERNATIONAL PARALLEL AND DISTRIBUTED PROCESSING SYMPOSIUM IPDPS 2020, 2020, : 285 - 294
  • [6] Joint Edge Server Deployment and Service Placement for Edge Computing-Enabled Maritime Internet of Things
    Zhang, Chaoyue
    Lin, Bin
    Cai, Lin X.
    Qian, Liping
    Wu, Yuan
    Qi, Shuang
    [J]. WIRELESS ALGORITHMS, SYSTEMS, AND APPLICATIONS, PT III, 2022, 13473 : 541 - 553
  • [7] Server Placement and Selection for Edge Computing in the ePC
    Hadzic, Ilija
    Abe, Yoshihisa
    Woithe, Hans Christian
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SERVICES COMPUTING, 2019, 12 (05) : 671 - 684
  • [8] Dynamic and intelligent edge server placement based on deep reinforcement learning in mobile edge computing
    Jiang, Xiaohan
    Hou, Peng
    Zhu, Hongbin
    Li, Bo
    Wang, Zongshan
    Ding, Hongwei
    [J]. AD HOC NETWORKS, 2023, 145
  • [9] Joint Edge Server Placement and Service Placement in Mobile-Edge Computing
    Zhang, Xinglin
    Li, Zhenjiang
    Lai, Chang
    Zhang, Junna
    [J]. IEEE INTERNET OF THINGS JOURNAL, 2022, 9 (13) : 11261 - 11274
  • [10] Evaluation of edge cloud server placement for edge computing environments
    Takeda, Ayaka
    Kimura, Tomotaka
    Hirata, Kouji
    [J]. 2019 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONSUMER ELECTRONICS - TAIWAN (ICCE-TW), 2019,