Expected utility, self-control, morality, and criminal probability

被引:44
|
作者
Tittle, Charles R. [2 ]
Antonaccio, Olena [1 ]
Botchkovar, Ekaterina [3 ]
Kranidioti, Maria [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Miami, Dept Sociol, Coral Gables, FL 33146 USA
[2] N Carolina State Univ, Dept Sociol & Anthropol, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
[3] Northeastern Univ, Sch Criminol & Criminal Justice, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Univ Athens, Sch Law, Athens, Greece
关键词
Rational choice theory; Self-control theory; Morality; Russia; Greece; RATIONAL CHOICE MODEL; GENERAL-THEORY; SOCIAL BONDS; DETERRENCE; CRIME; DELINQUENCY; CONSEQUENCES; GOTTFREDSON; PATTERNS; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.ssresearch.2010.08.007
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
With data from random sample household surveys conducted simultaneously in major cities in Greece and in Russia, we evaluate the import of individuals' morality relative to expected utility and self-control in predicting criminal probability. In addition, we examine potential interactions among the three variables in predicting criminal propensity and compare their relative effects across the two samples. The results suggest that all three factors are important and mostly independent influences in explaining criminal probability. However, the estimated effects of morality are substantially stronger than those of either expected utility or self-control, and all three of these explanatory variables appear to be somewhat sensitive to cultural contexts. Overall, our findings confirm that morality plays a comparatively larger part in explaining conformity than is generally recognized by major contemporary theories, although the data cannot show whether morality is an element in rational decision making or represents a contrary "non-rational" element in accounting for human conduct. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1029 / 1046
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条