Particle Number Emissions of Gasoline, Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) and Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) Fueled Vehicles at Different Ambient Temperatures

被引:16
|
作者
Lahde, Tero [1 ]
Giechaskiel, Barouch [1 ]
机构
[1] European Commiss, Joint Res Ctr JRC, I-21027 Ispra, Italy
关键词
vehicle exhaust emissions; solid particle number; sub-23; nm; alternative fuels; gaseous transportation fuels; CNG; LPG; DIESEL; NANOPARTICLES; COMBUSTION; EXHAUST; TAILPIPE; ENGINES; IMPACT; NM;
D O I
10.3390/atmos12070893
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Compressed natural gas (CNG) and liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) are included in the group of promoted transport fuel alternatives for traditional fossil fuels in Europe. Both CNG and LPG fueled vehicles are believed to have low particle number and mass emissions. Here, we studied the solid particle number (SPN) emissions >4 nm, >10 nm and >23 nm of bi-fuel vehicles applying CNG, LPG and gasoline fuels in laboratory at 23 degrees C and sub-zero (-7 degrees C) ambient temperature conditions. The SPN23 emissions in CNG or LPG operation modality at 23 degrees C were below the regulated SPN23 limit of diesel and gasoline direct injection vehicles 6 x 10(11) 1/km. Nevertheless, the limit was exceeded at sub-zero temperatures, when sub-23 nm particles were included, or when gasoline was used as a fuel. The key message of this study is that gas-fueled vehicles produced particles mainly <23 nm and the current methodology might not be appropriate. However, only in a few cases absolute SPN >10 nm emission levels exceeded 6 x 10(11) 1/km when >23 nm levels were below 6 x 10(11) 1/km. Setting a limit of 1 x 10(11) 1/km for >10 nm particles would also limit most of the >4 nm SPN levels below 6 x 10(11) 1/km.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Comparison of Ammonia Emission Factors from Light-Duty Vehicles Operating on Gasoline, Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) and Compressed Natural Gas (CNG)
    Bielaczyc, Piotr
    Szczotka, Andrzej
    Swiatek, Antoni
    Woodburn, Joseph
    [J]. SAE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FUELS AND LUBRICANTS, 2012, 5 (02) : 751 - 759
  • [2] Fuel properties of hydrogen, liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), and compressed natural gas (CNG) for transportation
    Demirbas, A
    [J]. ENERGY SOURCES, 2002, 24 (07): : 601 - 610
  • [3] Emissions of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) from motor vehicles
    Lai, Cheng-Hsun
    Chang, Chih-Chung
    Wang, Chieh-Heng
    Shao, Min
    Zhang, Yuanhang
    Wang, Jia-Lin
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2009, 43 (07) : 1456 - 1463
  • [4] Particle emissions from a HD SI gas engine fueled with LPG and CNG
    Napolitano, Pierpaolo
    Alfe, Michela
    Guido, Chiara
    Gargiulo, Valentina
    Fraioli, Valentina
    Beatrice, Carlo
    [J]. FUEL, 2020, 269
  • [5] Compressed natural gas (CNG): An alternative to liquefied natural gas (LNG)
    Economides, Michael J.
    Sun, Kai
    Subero, Gloria
    [J]. SPE PRODUCTION & OPERATIONS, 2006, 21 (02): : 318 - 324
  • [6] A comparison of emissions from vehicles fueled with diesel or compressed natural gas
    Hesterberg, Thomas W.
    Lapin, Charles A.
    Bunn, William B.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 42 (17) : 6437 - 6445
  • [7] Insights into tuning of equations of state models of natural gas (LNG & CNG) and liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) bearing petroleum reservoir fluids
    Dandekar, Abhijit Y.
    Patil, Shirish L.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE SEVENTEENTH (2007) INTERNATIONAL OFFSHORE AND POLAR ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, VOL 1- 4, PROCEEDINGS, 2007, : 89 - +
  • [8] The use of liquefied petroleum gas (lpg) and natural gas in gas turbine jet engines
    Koc, Ibrahim
    [J]. ADVANCES IN ENERGY RESEARCH, 2015, 3 (01): : 31 - 43
  • [9] COMPRESSED NATURAL-GAS AND LIQUEFIED PETROLEUM GAS AS ALTERNATIVE FUELS
    MOUSSAVI, M
    ALTURK, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENERGY ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1993, 119 (03): : 168 - 179
  • [10] Compressed natural gas (CNG) in fueled systems and the significance of CNG in vehicular transportation
    Ayar, G
    [J]. ENERGY SOURCES PART A-RECOVERY UTILIZATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS, 2006, 28 (07) : 639 - 641