Dexmedetomidine-remifentanil or propofol-remifentanil anesthesia in patients undergoing intracranial surgery

被引:3
|
作者
Günes, Y [1 ]
Gündüz, M [1 ]
Özcengiz, D [1 ]
Özbek, H [1 ]
Isik, G [1 ]
机构
[1] Cukurova Univ, Fac Med, Dept Anesthesiol, TR-01330 Adana, Turkey
关键词
dexmedetomidine; propofol; remifentanil; intracranial surgery;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Dexmedetomidine has been shown to provide good perioperative hemodynamic stability with decreased intraoperative opioid requirements. This study was conducted to compare the effect of dexmedetomidine-remifentanil (DR) anesthesia and propofol-remifentanil (PR) anesthesia on perioperative hemodynamics and postanesthesia. recovery profiles in patients undergoing intracranial surge After receiving Ethics Committee approval and informed patient consent, 78 American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II patients between the ages of 19 and 70 years with a Glasgow Coma Scale score 14 or 15 who were scheduled for elective intracranial surgery with general anesthesia were recruited. Anesthesia induction was provided by intravenous remifentanil (0.5 mu g/kg) and propofol (1.5-2 mg/kg) in both groups and maintained with infusion of DR (0.6-1.2 mg/kg/h and 0.25 mu g/kg/min)-nitrous oxide/oxygen (n(2)o/o(2)) in the DR group (n = 39) and infusion of PR (3-10 mg/kg/h and 0.25 mu g/kg/min)-n(2)o/o(2) in the PR group (n = 39). Hemodynamic variables were recorded before surgery, during the induction of anesthesia, after intubation, and during application of the headholder and skin incision; brain relaxation was also recorded. Times to extubation and awakening, eye opening, and response to commands as well as analgesic requirements were recorded after surgery. No significant difference was found in systolic blood pressure and mean arterial pressure throughout the study period except at the time of the dural incision (P < 0.05). These variables were significantly lower in the DR group (P < 0.05). Brain relaxation scores were similar between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). Time to extubation was significantly shorter in patients receiving PR anesthesia than in patients receiving DR anesthesia (3.6 minutes vs. 5.5 minutes). Analgesic requirements were significantly higher in the PR group than in the DR group (P = 0.013). No significant side effects were reported in the 2 groups (P > 0.05). In conclusion, dexmedetomidine (0.6-1.2 mu g/kg(-1)/h(-1)) Plus remifentanil (0.25 mu g/kg(-1) min(-1)) anesthesia offered lower analgesic requirements, a longer extubation time, and better hemodynamic stability compared with PR anesthesia for patients undergoing intracranial surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:122 / 126
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Dexmedetomidine-remifentanil vs propofol-remifentanil for monitored anesthesia care during hysteroscopy Randomized, single-blind, controlled trial
    Park, Seongjoo
    Choi, Soo-Lyoen
    Nahm, Francis Sahngun
    Ryu, Jung-Hee
    Do, Sang-Hwan
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (43): : E22712
  • [2] Comparison of the efficacy and safety of sedation between dexmedetomidine-remifentanil and propofol-remifentanil during endoscopic submucosal dissection
    Kim, Namo
    Yoo, Young-Chul
    Lee, Sang Kil
    Kim, Hyunzu
    Ju, Hyang Mi
    Min, Kyeong Tae
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2015, 21 (12) : 3671 - 3678
  • [3] Comparison of the efficacy and safety of sedation between dexmedetomidine-remifentanil and propofol-remifentanil during endoscopic submucosal dissection
    Namo Kim
    Young-Chul Yoo
    Sang Kil Lee
    Hyunzu Kim
    Hyang Mi Ju
    Kyeong Tae Min
    [J]. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2015, 21 (12) : 3671 - 3678
  • [4] The efficacy of dexmedetomidine-remifentanil versus dexmedetomidine-propofol in children undergoing flexible bronchoscopy A retrospective trial
    Zhang, Hongquan
    Fang, Baojun
    Zhou, Wenjing
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2017, 96 (01)
  • [5] A COMPARISON OF RECOVERY CHARACTERISTICS OF SEVOFLURANE AND PROPOFOL-REMIFENTANIL ANESTHESIA IN GERIATRIC PATIENTS
    Celik, Jale Bengi
    Topal, Ahmet
    Erol, Atilla
    Guven, Selcuk
    Kara, Inci
    [J]. TURKISH JOURNAL OF GERIATRICS-TURK GERIATRI DERGISI, 2011, 14 (03): : 208 - 213
  • [6] Comparison of the efficacy and safety of sedation protocols with the use of dexmedetomidine-remifentanil and propofol-remifentanil during percutaneous closure of atrial septal defects: a randomized clinical trial
    Chen, Xiao-Lan
    Huang, Wen-Hui
    Zheng, Yi-Han
    Zhang, Gui-Can
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC SURGERY, 2022, 17 (01)
  • [7] Lactic acidosis during propofol-remifentanil anesthesia in an adult
    Salengros, JC
    Velghe-Lenelle, CE
    Bollens, R
    Engelman, E
    Barvais, L
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2004, 101 (01) : 241 - 243
  • [8] Propofol-dexmedetomidine versus propofol-remifentanil conscious sedation for awake craniotomy during epilepsy surgery
    Elbakry, Abd-Elazeem
    Ibrahim, Ezzeldin
    [J]. MINERVA ANESTESIOLOGICA, 2017, 83 (12) : 1248 - 1254
  • [9] TOTAL INTRAVENOUS ANESTHESIA WITH REMIFENTANIL AND PROPOFOL IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING ELECTIVE INPATIENT SURGERY
    HOGUE, C
    CAMPORESI, E
    DUNCALF, D
    MIGUEL, R
    PITTS, M
    STREISAND, J
    BATENHORST, R
    JAMERSON, B
    MCNEAL, S
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1995, 83 (3A) : A386 - A386
  • [10] BIS-Vista™ Occipital Montage in Patients Undergoing Neurosurgical Procedures during Propofol-Remifentanil Anesthesia
    Dahaba, Ashraf A.
    Xue, Ji Xiu
    Zhao, Guo Guang
    Liu, Qing Hai
    Xu, Guo Xun
    Bornemann, Helmar
    Rehak, Peter H.
    Metzler, Helfried
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2010, 112 (03) : 645 - 651