Unsteady airloads on static airfoils through high angles of attack and in reverse flow

被引:18
|
作者
Lind, Andrew H. [1 ]
Jones, Anya R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Dept Aerosp Engn, 1151 Mfg Bldg, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[2] Univ Maryland, Dept Aerosp Engn, 3154 Glenn L Martin Hall, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
关键词
Reverse flow; Unsteady airloads; Vortex shedding; Leading edge separation; Shear layer; AERODYNAMICS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2016.03.005
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
The present work is aimed at understanding the sources, magnitude, and frequency of unsteady airloads acting on airfoils at high angles of attack and in reverse flow in order to improve the design of rotor blades for high-speed helicopters and wind turbines. Four rotor blade airfoils were tested at angles of attack through 180 and at three Reynolds numbers, up to one million. The unsteady airloads acting on each airfoil were calculated by integrating time-resolved pressure measurements acquired along the midspan of the airfoil. Unsteady velocity fields for a NACA 0012 were calculated from time-resolved particle image velocimetry measurements. For all airfoils, the unsteady airloads were found to be large in magnitude near stall, when an unstable shear layer induces unsteady flow on the suction side of the airfoil. At post-stall angles of attack, the unsteady airloads generally decreased as a region of separated flow builds over the suction side. As the angle of attack was increased further, the airloads become periodic and the flow entered the deep stall vortex shedding regime. At high angles of attack (30 degrees <= alpha <= 150 degrees), the unsteady airloads were greatest for airfoils with a blunt aerodynamic trailing edge due to unsteady induced flow from trailing edge vortices. Aerodynamic hysteresis was shown to cause large unsteady airloads as the static angle of attack is decreased near stall. The unsteady airloads of a NACA 0012 in reverse flow were observed to be insensitive to Reynolds number due to flow separation at the sharp leading edge of this relatively thin airfoil. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:259 / 279
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Aerodynamics of Airfoils at High and Reverse Angles of Attack
    Smith, Marilyn J.
    Liggett, Nicholas D.
    Koukol, Benjamin C. G.
    JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 2011, 48 (06): : 2012 - 2023
  • [2] Unsteady aeroelastic behaviors of rigid airfoils with preset angles of attack
    Bichiou, Y.
    Nuhait, A. O.
    Abdelkefi, A.
    Hajj, M. R.
    JOURNAL OF VIBRATION AND CONTROL, 2016, 22 (04) : 1010 - 1022
  • [3] UNSTEADY-FLOW SEPARATION ON SLENDER BODIES AT HIGH ANGLES OF ATTACK
    ERICSSON, LE
    JOURNAL OF SPACECRAFT AND ROCKETS, 1993, 30 (06) : 689 - 695
  • [4] Effects of Blockage on Airfoils and Wings at High Angles of Attack
    Traub, Lance W.
    JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 2015, 52 (03): : 990 - +
  • [5] INITIAL ACCELERATION EFFECTS ON FLOW EVOLUTION AROUND AIRFOILS PITCHING TO HIGH ANGLES OF ATTACK
    KOOCHESFAHANI, MM
    SMILJANOVSKI, V
    AIAA JOURNAL, 1993, 31 (08) : 1529 - 1531
  • [6] The optimum airfoils at low angles of attack in a supersonic gas flow
    Zubov, VI
    PMM JOURNAL OF APPLIED MATHEMATICS AND MECHANICS, 1997, 61 (01): : 83 - 91
  • [7] Unsteady Flow Around Airfoil at Large Angles of Attack
    Udartsev, E. P.
    Shvets, O. V.
    Pereverzev, O. M.
    Alekseenko, S. I.
    2013 IEEE 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF UNMANNED AIR VEHICLES DEVELOPMENTS (APUAVD), 2013, : 65 - 67
  • [8] DIRECT-INVERSE METHOD FOR AIRFOILS AT HIGH ANGLES OF ATTACK
    CARLSON, LA
    JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 1987, 24 (02): : 98 - 106
  • [9] The numerical analysis of wind turbine airfoils at high angles of attack
    Nelson, Bryan
    Kouh, Jen-Shiang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2016, 7 (01) : 1 - 12
  • [10] Dynamic Stall Flow Structure and Forces on Symmetrical Airfoils at High Angles of Attack and Rotation Rates
    Leknys, R. R.
    Arjomandi, M.
    Kelso, R. M.
    Birzer, C. H.
    JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2019, 141 (05):