Sedation for Colonoscopy: Comparison of Remifentanil and Alfentanil Combined with Propofol/Midazolam

被引:1
|
作者
Ancan, Sule [1 ]
Cicekci, Faruk [2 ]
Hacibeyoglu, Gulcin [1 ]
Sizer, Cigdem [3 ]
Uzun, Sema Tuncer [1 ]
Dertli, Ramazan [4 ]
Keskin, Muharrem [4 ]
机构
[1] Necmettin Erbakan Univ, Dept Anaesthesiol, Fac Med, Konya, Turkey
[2] Selcuk Univ, Dept Anaesthesiol, Fac Med, Konya, Turkey
[3] Numune Hosp, Clin Anaesthesiol, Konya, Turkey
[4] Necmettin Erbakan Univ, Dept Gastroenterol, Fac Med, Konya, Turkey
来源
ISTANBUL MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2019年 / 20卷 / 06期
关键词
Alfentanil; colonoscopy; remifentanil; sedation; GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY; MODERATE SEDATION; BISPECTRAL INDEX; PROPOFOL SEDATION; DOUBLE-BLIND; FENTANYL; MIDAZOLAM; ANESTHESIOLOGY; KETAMINE; SAFETY;
D O I
10.4274/imj.galenos.2019.26566
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Different drug combinations are used in patients who underwent colonoscopy for safe sedation and early discharge. Remifentanil and alfentanil are short-acting narcotic analgesic agents. A short-acting anxiolytic agent, midazolam has a potent sedative efficiency when combined with narcotic analgesics. In this study, we aimed to compare the effectiveness of the two opioids that have not been previously compared in the literature, combined with propofol/midazolam in patients who underwent colonoscopy. Methods: One hundred eighty-nine patients aged over 18 years who underwent diagnostic and/or therapeutic colonoscopy were included in the study. 1 mg midazolam + 5 mu g kg-1 alfentanil + 1 mg kg-1 propofol were administered in the alfentanil group (group A), while 1 mg midazolam + 0.1 mu g kg-1 min-1 remifentanil + 1 mg kg-1 propofol were administered in the remifentanil group (group R). Hemodynamic data, Modified Steward scale (MSS), Visual Analog scale (VAS), additional propofol doses, total procedure time, awake time, recovery time, and side effects were recorded during the procedure. After the procedure, all patients were transferred to the recovery room, and the Modified Aldrete scale (MAS) values were recorded. Results: There was a statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of total propofol and additional propofol doses (p<0.05), with additional propofol dose being higher in group A compared to group R (p<0.05). Awake time was similar between the groups. Recovery time was longer in group A compared to group R (p<0.05). No significant difference was observed in the side effects between both groups. Conclusion: Although the low dose of midazolam combined with propofol/remifentanil and propofol/alfentanil provided adequate sedation and analgesia, we believe that remifentanil is an ideal choice for daily procedures like colonoscopy because of its advantages resulting from its pharmacological properties.
引用
收藏
页码:512 / 518
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A comparison of midazolam, alfentanil and propofol for sedation in oupatient intraocular surgery
    Fiona E. McHardy
    Joanne Fortier
    Frances Chung
    Ananthan Krishnathas
    Scott I. Marshall
    [J]. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia, 2000, 47 : 211 - 214
  • [2] COMPARISON OF PROPOFOL, ALFENTANIL AND MIDAZOLAM FOR SEDATION DURING SPINAL ANAESTHAESIA
    UMUROGLU, T
    ETI, Z
    GOGUS, FY
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1995, 74 : 80 - 80
  • [3] A comparison of midazolam, alfentanil and propofol for sedation in outpatient intraocular surgery
    McHardy, FE
    Fortier, J
    Chung, F
    Krishnathas, A
    Marshall, SI
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 2000, 47 (03): : 211 - 214
  • [4] Sedation for outpatient endometrial biopsy: Comparison of remifentanil-propofol and Alfentanil-propofol
    Dogru, K
    Madenoglu, H
    Yildiz, K
    Boyaci, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2003, 31 (01) : 31 - 35
  • [5] Comparison of etomidate-remifentanil and propofol-remifentanil sedation in patients scheduled for colonoscopy
    Toklu, Salime
    Iyilikci, Leyla
    Gonen, Can
    Ciftci, Lugen
    Gunenc, Ferim
    Sahin, Elvan
    Gokel, Erol
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2009, 26 (05) : 370 - 376
  • [6] Conscious analgesia/sedation with remifentanil and propofol versus total intravenous anesthesia with fentanyl, midazolam, and propofol for outpatient colonoscopy
    Rudner, R
    Jalowiecki, P
    Kawecki, P
    Gonciarz, M
    Mularczyk, A
    Petelenz, M
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2003, 57 (05) : 657 - 663
  • [7] Sedoanalgesia for cardioversion: comparison of alfentanil, remifentanil and fentanyl combined with propofol and midazolam: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study
    Ozkan, G.
    Ince, M. E.
    Eskin, M. B.
    Erol, G.
    Kadan, M.
    Ozgur, G.
    Doganci, S.
    Yildirim, V.
    [J]. EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2016, 20 (06) : 1140 - 1148
  • [8] Blepharoplasty and Otoplasty: Comparative Sedation with Remifentanil,Propofol, and Midazolam
    G. A. Ferraro
    A. Corcione
    G. Nicoletti
    F. Rossano
    A. Perrotta
    F. D’ Andrea
    [J]. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 2005, 29 : 181 - 183
  • [9] Use of remifentanil in combination with propofol sedation for immersion lithotripsy:: A comparison to fentanyl, alfentanil and sufentanil
    Gesztesi, ZS
    Sá-Rêgo, MM
    White, PF
    Inagaki, Y
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1999, 88 (02):
  • [10] Remifentanil/propofol versus fentanyl/midazolam for ICU sedation
    Wilhelm, W.
    Wrobel, M.
    Ketter, R.
    Steudel, W.
    Kreuer, S.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2004, 21 : 173 - 173