An experimental study on RP-3 jet fuel injection on a common rail injection system

被引:1
|
作者
Zhao Tong-bin [1 ]
Wu Yi-sheng [2 ]
Duan Yao-zong [1 ]
Huang Zhen [1 ]
Han Dong [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Key Lab Power Machinery & Engn, Minist Educ, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, China UK Low Carbon Coll, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
RP-3 jet fuel; diesel engine; single injection; pilot-main injection; common rail injection system; FATTY-ACID ESTERS; DIESEL; COMBUSTION; AUTOIGNITION; CHALLENGES; EMISSIONS; KEROSENE; BLENDS; OIL;
D O I
10.1007/s11771-022-5079-5
中图分类号
TF [冶金工业];
学科分类号
0806 ;
摘要
RP-3 jet fuel could be an alternative fuel for diesel engines. In this study, the injection characteristics of RP-3 jet fuel under single and split injection strategies were investigated and compared with diesel fuel. The experimental results indicate that RP-3 jet fuel has slightly shorter injection delay time than diesel fuel, but this difference is negligible in actual engine operations. Further, although the lower density and viscosity of RP-3 jet fuel lead to higher volumetric injection rates and cycle-based injection quantities, the cycle-based injection mass and the mass injection rates at the stable injection stage of RP-3 jet fuel are close to or slightly lower than those of diesel fuel. Based on these experimental observations, it could be concluded that fuel physical properties are the secondary factor influencing the injection characteristics in both single and split injection strategies, as RP-3 jet fuel and diesel fuel are taken for comparison.
引用
收藏
页码:2179 / 2188
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An experimental study on RP-3 jet fuel injection on a common rail injection systemRP-3 航空煤油高压共轨喷射特性的实验研究
    Tong-bin Zhao
    Yi-sheng Wu
    Yao-zong Duan
    Zhen Huang
    Dong Han
    [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2022, 29 : 2179 - 2188
  • [2] EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON INJECTION CHARACTERISTICS OF DIESEL AND BIODIESEL FUEL BLENDS WITH COMMON RAIL INJECTION SYSTEM
    Slavinskas, Stasys
    Labeckas, Gvidonas
    Mickevicius, Tomas
    [J]. 17TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE: ENGINEERING FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT, 2018, : 2134 - 2140
  • [3] Experimental and modeling study of liquid fuel injection and combustion in diesel engines with a common rail injection system
    Xu, Leilei
    Bai, Xue-Song
    Jia, Ming
    Qian, Yong
    Qiao, Xinqi
    Lu, Xingcai
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2018, 230 : 287 - 304
  • [4] Modelling of a common rail fuel injection system
    Huhtala, K
    Tikkanen, S
    Vilenius, M
    [J]. BATH WORKSHOP ON POWER TRANSMISSION AND MOTION CONTROL, 2000, : 215 - 225
  • [5] Experimental study on injection characteristics of near/supercritical RP-3 aviation kerosene
    Ge, Hao
    Fan, Yuxin
    Wang, Weili
    Yue, Chen
    Cao, Chenghao
    Liu, Yian
    [J]. Hangkong Dongli Xuebao/Journal of Aerospace Power, 2024, 39 (08):
  • [6] EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON INJECTION AND MACROSCOPIC SPRAY CHARACTERISTICS OF ETHYL OLEATE, JET FUEL AND THEIR BLEND ON A DIESEL ENGINE COMMON RAIL SYSTEM
    Duan, Yaozong
    Han, Dong
    Li, Pengfei
    Wang, Chunhai
    Lin, He
    Huang, Zhen
    [J]. ATOMIZATION AND SPRAYS, 2015, 25 (09) : 777 - 793
  • [7] Numerical study on fuel physical effects on the split injection processes on a common rail injection system
    Han, Dong
    Li, Ke
    Duan, Yaozong
    Lin, He
    Huang, Zhen
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 134 : 47 - 58
  • [8] The optimization of common rail fuel injection. system
    An, SJ
    Ouyang, GY
    Li, YX
    Liu, Z
    [J]. ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2003, : 961 - 965
  • [9] Mathematic model of common rail fuel injection system
    Yu, Jin-Xia
    Guo, Hai-Tao
    Zhuo, Bin
    [J]. Shanghai Haiyun Xueyuan Xuebao/Journal of Shanghai Maritime University, 2002, 23 (02):
  • [10] Experimental measurement of solubility of carbon dioxide in RP-3 jet fuel
    Li C.-Y.
    Feng S.-Y.
    Shao L.
    Pan J.
    Liu W.-H.
    [J]. Hangkong Dongli Xuebao/Journal of Aerospace Power, 2017, 32 (04): : 949 - 954