The environmental fate and effects of anti-sea lice chemotherapeutants used in salmon aquaculture

被引:25
|
作者
Strachan, Fauve [1 ]
Kennedy, Christopher J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Simon Fraser Univ, Dept Biol Sci, 8888 Univ Dr, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada
关键词
Chemotherapeutants; Pesticides; Sea lice; Fate; Toxicity; Salmon; EMAMECTIN BENZOATE; HYDROGEN-PEROXIDE; ACUTE TOXICITY; ORGANOPHOSPHATE PESTICIDE; AZAMETHIPHOS; SEDIMENT; LOBSTER; CYPERMETHRIN; LETHALITY; LARVAE;
D O I
10.1016/j.aquaculture.2021.737079
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
The active ingredients from 5 chemotherapeutant formulations (Slice (R) [active ingredient [AI] emamectin benzoate), Salmosan (R) (AI azimethiphos), Alphamax (R) (AI deltamethrin), Excis (R) (AI cypermethrin), and Interox (R) Paramove 50 (AI hydrogen peroxide) that have been used or continue to be used to treat sea lice in-festations in salmon aquaculture were examined to generate data on their environmental partitioning and persistence in water-sediment microcosms, as well as their acute and subchronic toxicity to representative classes of marine organisms. Emamectin benzoate, cypermethrin and deltamethrin partitioned mainly to the sediment phase; azimethiphos and hydrogen peroxide remained mainly in the water phase. The persistence of chemicals in water was: CP > DM > AZ > HP (half-lives: 19.8, 17.9, 12.7 d, and 8.9 h, respectively). In sediments, the following trend in calculated half-lives was observed: CP > EB > DM (half-lives: 557, 230 and 45 d, respectively). Toxicity test results with a wide variety of marine organisms (macroalgae, echinoderms, bivalves, crustaceans and fish) showed no susceptibility trend for any species, or inherent toxicity trend for any chemical, although DM tended to be the most toxic and HP the least toxic to the majority of species. This information is useful for identifying risks; specifically, toxicological parameters calculated for several of the non-target marine organisms examined, indicate that recommended treatment concentrations could result in non-target organism toxicity following release in the immediate vicinity of aquaculture sites before significant dilution. This study provides valuable data on the environmental fate and associated risks of chemotherapeutant use to non-target marine organisms whose habitat coincides with salmon aquaculture sites.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Species sensitivity distributions for two widely used anti-sea lice chemotherapeutants in the salmon aquaculture industry
    Hamoutene, D.
    Marteinson, S.
    Kingsbury, M.
    McTavish, K.
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 857
  • [2] Anti-Sea Lice Veterinary Medicinal Products on Salmon Farms: A Review and Analysis of Their Usage Patterns, Environmental Fate and Hazard Potential
    Parsons, Aoife E.
    Escobar-Lux, Rosa H.
    Hannisdal, Rita
    Agnalt, Ann-Lisbeth
    Samuelsen, Ole B.
    REVIEWS IN AQUACULTURE, 2025, 17 (02)
  • [3] Environmental effects of salmon sea lice treatments
    不详
    VETERINARY RECORD, 2005, 156 (17) : 526 - 526
  • [4] Anti-sea lice agents in Norwegian aquaculture; surveillance, treatment trends and possible implications for food safety
    Hannisdal, Rita
    Nostbakken, Ole Jakob
    Hove, Helge
    Madsen, Lise
    Horsberg, Tor Einar
    Lunestad, Bjorn Tore
    AQUACULTURE, 2020, 521
  • [5] Quantifying environmental impacts of cleaner fish used as sea lice treatments in salmon aquaculture with life cycle assessment
    Philis, Gaspard
    Ziegler, Friederike
    Jansen, Mona Dverdal
    Gansel, Lars Christian
    Hornborg, Sara
    Aas, Grete Hansen
    Stene, Anne
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2022, 26 (06) : 1992 - 2005
  • [6] Aquaculture and environmental drivers of salmon lice infestation and body condition in sea trout
    Shephard, Samuel
    MacIntyre, Craig
    Gargan, Patrick
    AQUACULTURE ENVIRONMENT INTERACTIONS, 2016, 8 : 597 - 610
  • [7] Environmental effects of the anti-sea lice (Copepoda: Caligidae) therapeutant emamectin benzoate under commercial use conditions in the marine environment
    Telfer, T. C.
    Baird, D. J.
    McHenery, J. G.
    Stone, J.
    Sutherland, I.
    Wislocki, P.
    AQUACULTURE, 2006, 260 (1-4) : 163 - 180
  • [8] Estimating the cost of sea lice to salmon aquaculture in eastern Canada
    Mustafa, A
    Rankaduwa, W
    Campbell, P
    CANADIAN VETERINARY JOURNAL-REVUE VETERINAIRE CANADIENNE, 2001, 42 (01): : 54 - 56
  • [9] Effects of host migration, diversity and aquaculture on sea lice threats to Pacific salmon populations
    Krkosek, Martin
    Gottesfeld, Allen
    Proctor, Bart
    Rolston, Dave
    Carr-Harris, Charmaine
    Lewis, Mark A.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2007, 274 (1629) : 3141 - 3149
  • [10] Cumulative impact of anti-sea lice treatment (azamethiphos) on health status of Rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss, Walbaum 1792) in aquaculture
    Barisic, Josip
    Cannon, Stuart
    Quinn, Brian
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2019, 9 (1)