Implementing patient-reported outcomes into routine care: an audit of cancer patients from two local health districts in New South Wales to understand their capabilities and preferences

被引:1
|
作者
Bamgboje-Ayodele, Adeola [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Arnold, Belinda [3 ]
Durcinoska, Ivana [1 ]
Avery, Sandra [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Vinod, Shalini [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Rincones, Orlando [1 ]
Thomas, Tien [4 ]
Descallar, Joseph [1 ,2 ]
Smith, Ben [1 ,2 ]
Delaney, Geoff P. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Girgis, Afaf [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Ingham Inst Appl Med Res, Liverpool, NSW 1871, Australia
[2] UNSW Sydney, UNSW Med & Hlth, South Western Sydney Clin Sch, Kensington, NSW 2052, Australia
[3] Wollongong Hosp, Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Hlth Dist, Wollongong, NSW 2500, Australia
[4] Liverpool Hosp, Liverpool Canc Therapy Ctr, South Western Sydney Local Hlth Dist, Liverpool, NSW 1871, Australia
[5] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Sch Med Sci, Biomed Informat & Digital Hlth, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia
关键词
cancer; clinic audit; electronic patient reported outcomes; ePROs; implementation; PROM; routine care; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; EHEALTH;
D O I
10.1071/AH21270
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective It has been established that the implementation of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in routine care provides significant benefits to patients, providers and health services. However, there are patient-level barriers that must be identified and addressed for the successful implementation of PROMs. This study aimed to understand the capabilities and preferences of our cancer patient population prior to implementation of electronically collected PROMs (ePROMs). Specifically, we conducted a clinic audit to determine the proportion of patients in clinics with access to out-of-clinic internet; those preferring to complete PROMs on paper or via an electronic device; those capable of completing PROMs in English; and those anticipating requiring assistance to complete PROMs. Methods Patients receiving cancer treatment or follow-up care at two Local Health Districts (LHDs) in New South Wales, Australia, completed a questionnaire (audit form) with items about internet and mobile access, communication preferences and assistance needed to complete PROMs. Participant demographic and treatment information were extracted from their electronic medical records. Results Across both LHDs, 637 of 1668 participants (38%) completed the audit forms. Mean participant age was 65 years (range = 23-98), 53% were female, and 92% were outpatients. Patients in the two LHDs differed in their levels of internet and email access, and ability to complete PROMs independently in English, suggesting that some LHD-specific tailoring of implementation strategies is necessary to optimise ePROMs uptake. Conclusion This study highlights the importance of understanding the specific local contexts and patient populations, including potential technology and language barriers, which can influence patient ability to complete ePROMs.
引用
收藏
页码:331 / 337
页数:7
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] Implementing routine assessment of patient-reported outcomes in cancer care.
    Mooney, Kathi
    Biber, Joshua
    Hess, Rachel
    Weeks, Howard
    Sweetenham, John W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 35 (08)
  • [2] Implementing patient-reported outcomes in routine clinical care for diverse and underrepresented patients in the United States
    Hyland, Colby J.
    Guo, Ruby
    Dhawan, Ravi
    Kaur, Manraj N.
    Bain, Paul A.
    Edelen, Maria O.
    Pusic, Andrea L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES, 2022, 6 (01)
  • [3] Implementing patient-reported outcomes in routine clinical care for diverse and underrepresented patients in the United States
    Colby J. Hyland
    Ruby Guo
    Ravi Dhawan
    Manraj N. Kaur
    Paul A. Bain
    Maria O. Edelen
    Andrea L. Pusic
    [J]. Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, 6
  • [4] An audit and analysis of electro convulsive therapy patient information sheets used in local health districts in New South Wales Australia
    Wand, Timothy
    Isobel, Sophie
    Kemp, Holly
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH NURSING, 2024, 33 (04) : 1119 - 1128
  • [5] From smartphone to electronic health record (EHR): An innovative implementation of patient-reported outcomes and patient-generated health data in routine cancer care
    Murali-Ganesh, Raghav
    Tan, Zachary
    Harvey, Andrew
    Ballurkar, Kieran
    Navani, Vishal
    Pooviah, Nikhil
    [J]. ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 14 : 120 - 121
  • [6] From patient-reported outcomes (PROs) to family-reported outcomes (FROs): Acceptability and perceived usefulness of routine screening in cancer care
    Lambert, Sylvie
    Loban, Katya
    Gignac, Anne-Sophie
    Magalhaes, Mona
    Brahim, Lydia Ould
    Chehayeb, Sarah
    Wasserman, Sydney
    [J]. PALLIATIVE & SUPPORTIVE CARE, 2024,
  • [7] Using patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in routine head and neck cancer care: What do health professionals perceive as barriers and facilitators?
    Nguyen, Hanh
    Butow, Phyllis
    Dhillon, Haryana
    Morris, Lucinda
    Brown, Alison
    West, Katrina
    Sundaresan, Puma
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2020, 64 (05) : 704 - 710
  • [8] HOW LONG ARE THE INTERVALS TO DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT IN NEW SOUTH WALES (NSW) PATIENTS WITH LUNG CANCER? A PATIENT-REPORTED PERSPECTIVE
    Malalasekera, A.
    Blinman, P.
    Dhillon, H.
    Stefanic, N.
    Kao, S.
    Vardy, J.
    [J]. ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 12 : 62 - 62
  • [9] The use of patient-reported outcomes in routine cancer care: preliminary insights from a multinational scoping survey of oncology practitioners
    Yin Ting Cheung
    Alexandre Chan
    Andreas Charalambous
    H. S. Darling
    Lawson Eng
    Lisa Grech
    Corina J. G. van den Hurk
    Deborah Kirk
    Sandra A. Mitchell
    Dagmara Poprawski
    Elke Rammant
    Imogen Ramsey
    Margaret I. Fitch
    Raymond J. Chan
    [J]. Supportive Care in Cancer, 2022, 30 : 1427 - 1439
  • [10] The use of patient-reported outcomes in routine cancer care: preliminary insights from a multinational scoping survey of oncology practitioners
    Cheung, Yin Ting
    Chan, Alexandre
    Charalambous, Andreas
    Darling, H. S.
    Eng, Lawson
    Grech, Lisa
    van den Hurk, Corina J. G.
    Kirk, Deborah
    Mitchell, Sandra A.
    Poprawski, Dagmara
    Rammant, Elke
    Ramsey, Imogen
    Fitch, Margaret, I
    Chan, Raymond J.
    [J]. SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2022, 30 (02) : 1427 - 1439