Efficacy and Safety of Deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Office Workers with Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Trial

被引:16
|
作者
Matsuda, Yuki [1 ]
Kito, Shinsuke [1 ]
Igarashi, Yoshio [2 ]
Shigeta, Masahiro [1 ]
机构
[1] Jikei Univ, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat, Tokyo, Japan
[2] Med Care Toranomon Clin, Dept Psychiat, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
Deep transcranial magnetic stimulation; Treatment-resistant depression; Worker; Efficacy; Safety; BIPOLAR DEPRESSION; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; TMS; METAANALYSIS; OUTCOMES; RTMS;
D O I
10.1159/000505405
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Objectives: Major depression is a highly prevalent disorder that causes economic burden in office workers. We conducted a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of deep transcranial magnetic stimulation (dTMS) in office workers with treatment-resistant depression. Methods: In this study, we randomized office workers taking administrative leave for treatment-resistant major depressive disorder or bipolar disorder with current major depressive episode. dTMS treatment was applied at 120% resting motor threshold with 18 Hz over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. The treatment sessions delivered a total of 1,980 pulses a day, 5 days a week, for 4-6 weeks. The primary outcome was change in the total score on the 21-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-21) from baseline to the end of study in an intent-to-treat analysis. The secondary outcomes were the response and remission rates. We also assessed changes in cognitive function and adverse events. Results: Forty patients were randomized to active or sham dTMS groups (1:1). The change in the total score on the HDRS-21 was more significantly improved in the active group than in the sham group at 6 weeks (p = 0.045). There were no significant differences in the response and remission rates or cognitive measures between the active and sham groups. No serious adverse events were observed in either group. Conclusions: These results suggest that dTMS might be effective and safe in office workers with treatment-resistant depression. Further well-designed studies are needed.
引用
收藏
页码:208 / 213
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Left prefrontal transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment-resistant depression in adolescents: a double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled trial
    Croarkin, Paul E.
    Elmaadawi, Ahmed Z.
    Aaronson, Scott T.
    Schrodt, G. Randolph, Jr.
    Holbert, Richard C.
    Verdoliva, Sarah
    Heart, Karen L.
    Demitrack, Mark A.
    Strawn, Jeffrey R.
    [J]. NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2021, 46 (02) : 462 - 469
  • [2] Left prefrontal transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment-resistant depression in adolescents: a double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled trial
    Paul E. Croarkin
    Ahmed Z. Elmaadawi
    Scott T. Aaronson
    G. Randolph Schrodt
    Richard C. Holbert
    Sarah Verdoliva
    Karen L. Heart
    Mark A. Demitrack
    Jeffrey R. Strawn
    [J]. Neuropsychopharmacology, 2021, 46 : 462 - 469
  • [3] Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Treatment-Resistant Major Depression: A Double-Blind Randomized Sham-Controlled Trial
    Sharafi, Elham
    Taghva, Arsia
    Arbabi, Mohammad
    Dadarkhah, Afsaneh
    Ghaderi, Jamshid
    [J]. CLINICAL EEG AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2019, 50 (06) : 375 - 382
  • [4] A randomized double-blind sham-controlled comparison of unilateral and bilateral repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment-resistant major depression
    Blumberger, Daniel M.
    Mulsant, Benoit H.
    Fitzgerald, Paul B.
    Rajji, Tarek K.
    Ravindran, Arun V.
    Young, L. Trevor
    Levinson, Andrea J.
    Daskalakis, Zafiris J.
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2012, 13 (06): : 423 - 435
  • [5] A double-blind, sham-controlled trial of transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of depression
    Loo, Colleen K.
    Sachdev, Perminder
    Martin, Donel
    Pigot, Melissa
    Alonzo, Angelo
    Malhi, Gin S.
    Lagopoulos, Jim
    Mitchell, Philip
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2010, 13 (01): : 61 - 69
  • [6] Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation as an augmentative strategy for treatment-resistant depression, a meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind and sham-controlled study
    Liu, Bangshan
    Zhang, Yan
    Zhang, Li
    Li, Lingjiang
    [J]. BMC PSYCHIATRY, 2014, 14
  • [7] Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation as an augmentative strategy for treatment-resistant depression, a meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind and sham-controlled study
    Bangshan Liu
    Yan Zhang
    Li Zhang
    Lingjiang Li
    [J]. BMC Psychiatry, 14
  • [8] The priming effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on clinical response to electroconvulsive therapy in treatment-resistant depression: a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study
    Rotharmel, Maud
    Quesada, Pierre
    Husson, Thomas
    Harika-Germaneau, Ghina
    Nathou, Clement
    Guehl, Julien
    Dalmont, Marine
    Opolczynski, Gaelle
    Mirea-Grivel, Iris
    Millet, Bruno
    Gerardin, Emmanuel
    Compere, Vincent
    Dollfus, Sonia
    Jaafari, Nemat
    Benichou, Jacques
    Thill, Caroline
    Guillin, Olivier
    Moulier, Virginie
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 53 (05) : 2060 - 2071
  • [9] Transcranial stimulation in frontotemporal dementia: A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial
    Benussi, Alberto
    Dell'Era, Valentina
    Cosseddu, Maura
    Cantoni, Valentina
    Cotelli, Maria Sofia
    Cotelli, Maria
    Manenti, Rosa
    Benussi, Luisa
    Brattini, Chiara
    Alberici, Antonella
    Borroni, Barbara
    [J]. ALZHEIMERS & DEMENTIA-TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH & CLINICAL INTERVENTIONS, 2020, 6 (01) : 1 - 11
  • [10] Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in combination with escitalopram in patients with treatment-resistant major depression. A double-blind, randomised, sham-controlled trial
    Bretlau, L. G.
    Lunde, M.
    Lindberg, L.
    Unden, M.
    Dissing, S.
    Bech, P.
    [J]. PHARMACOPSYCHIATRY, 2008, 41 (02) : 41 - 47