The convergent validity of the Phobia Origins Questionnaire (POQ): a review of the evidence

被引:10
|
作者
Menzies, RG
Kirkby, K
Harris, LM
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Fac Hlth Serv, Dept Behav Sci, Lidcombe, NSW 2141, Australia
[2] Univ Tasmania, Sch Clin, Dept Psychiat, Hobart, Tas 7000, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0005-7967(98)00067-9
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The Phobic Origins Questionnaire (POQ) [Ost, L.-G. & Hugdahl, K. (1981). Acquisition of phobias and anxiety response patterns in clinical patients. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 19, 439-447.] is the most commonly cited instrument for determining the origins of phobic anxiety and data obtained using this instrument strongly support the role of conditioning in the acquisition of fear reactions. The construct validity of the POQ in assessing episodes of conditioning has been questioned [e.g. Menzies, R. G. & Clarke, J. C. (1994). Retrospective studies of the origins of phobias: a review. Anxiety,, Stress and Coping, 7, 305-318.] This paper examined the convergent validity of the POQ by comparing origins' classifications based on the POQ to classifications based on alternative instruments. The convergent validity of the POQ was found to be extremely poor. The POQ was consistently associated with a much greater likelihood of classifying the origin of fear reactions as due to direct conditioning episodes than was found using alternative instruments. The findings question the usefulness of the POQ in examining the origins of phobic anxiety. (C) 1998 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. Ail rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1081 / 1089
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Recall and validation of phobia origins as a function of a structured interview versus the phobia origins questionnaire
    Kheriaty, E
    Kleinknecht, RA
    Hyman, IE
    [J]. BEHAVIOR MODIFICATION, 1999, 23 (01) : 61 - 78
  • [2] Structural and convergent validity of the homework performance questionnaire
    Pendergast, Laura L.
    Watkins, Marley W.
    Canivez, Gary L.
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 34 (03) : 291 - 304
  • [3] The Group Readiness Questionnaire: A Convergent Validity Analysis
    Baker, Elizabeth
    Burlingame, Gary M.
    Cox, Jonathan C.
    Beecher, Mark E.
    Gleave, Robert L.
    [J]. GROUP DYNAMICS-THEORY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2013, 17 (04) : 299 - 314
  • [4] Convergent validity of the physical activity questionnaire for adolescents
    Kowalski, KC
    Crocker, PRE
    Kowalski, NP
    [J]. PEDIATRIC EXERCISE SCIENCE, 1997, 9 (04) : 342 - 352
  • [5] Cognitive Emotional Regulation Questionnaire-18 in College Students: Evidence of Convergent and Discriminant Validity
    Dominguez-Lara, Sergio
    Merino-Soto, Cesar
    [J]. REVISTA IBEROAMERICANA DE DIAGNOSTICO Y EVALUACION-E AVALIACAO PSICOLOGICA, 2018, 2 (47): : 171 - 184
  • [6] Assessing convergent and discriminant validity of the influence behavior questionnaire
    Blickle, G
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 1998, 82 (03) : 923 - 929
  • [7] An analysis of the convergent and discriminant validity of the transformational leadership questionnaire
    Alban-Metcalfe, RJ
    Alimo-Metcalfe, B
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SELECTION AND ASSESSMENT, 2000, 8 (03) : 158 - 175
  • [8] An examination of the convergent and discriminant validity of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire
    Hill, Crystal R.
    Hughes, Jan N.
    [J]. SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY QUARTERLY, 2007, 22 (03) : 380 - 406
  • [9] Convergent validity of the tinnitus handicap inventory and the tinnitus questionnaire
    Baguley, DM
    Humphriss, RL
    Hodgson, CA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 2000, 114 (11): : 840 - 843
  • [10] CONVERGENT AND DISCRIMINANT VALIDITY OF FIRO-B QUESTIONNAIRE
    SALMINEN, S
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 1991, 69 (03) : 787 - 790