Computer Vision-Based Hazard Identification of Construction Site Using Visual Relationship Detection and Ontology

被引:11
|
作者
Li, Yange [1 ]
Wei, Han [1 ]
Han, Zheng [1 ]
Jiang, Nan [1 ]
Wang, Weidong [1 ]
Huang, Jianling [1 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Changsha 410075, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 国家重点研发计划;
关键词
hazard identification; ontology; safety management; visual relationship detection; PRINCIPLES; HEIGHT; MODEL; WORK;
D O I
10.3390/buildings12060857
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Onsite systematic monitoring benefits hazard prevention immensely. Hazard identification is usually limited due to the semantic gap. Previous studies that integrate computer vision and ontology can address the semantic gap and detect the onsite hazards. However, extracting and encoding regulatory documents in a computer-processable format often requires manual work which is costly and time-consuming. A novel and universally applicable framework is proposed that integrates computer vision, ontology, and natural language processing to improve systematic safety management, capable of hazard prevention and elimination. Visual relationship detection based on computer vision is used to detect and predict multiple interactions between objects in images, whose relationships are then coded in a three-tuple format because it has abundant expressiveness and is computer-accessible. Subsequently, the concepts of construction safety ontology are presented to address the semantic gap. The results are subsequently recorded into the SWI Prolog, a commonly used tool to run Prolog (programming of logic), as facts and compared with triplet rules extracted from using natural language processing to indicate the potential risks in the ongoing work. The high-performance results of Recall@100 demonstrated that the chosen method can precisely predict the interactions between objects and help to improve onsite hazard identification.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Real-time vision-based worker localization & hazard detection for construction
    Jeelani, Idris
    Asadi, Khashayar
    Ramshankar, Hariharan
    Han, Kevin
    Albert, Alex
    [J]. AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 121
  • [2] Investigation of Edge Computing in Computer Vision-Based Construction Resource Detection
    Chen, Chen
    Gu, Hao
    Lian, Shenghao
    Zhao, Yiru
    Xiao, Bo
    [J]. BUILDINGS, 2022, 12 (12)
  • [3] Computer vision-based construction progress monitoring
    Reja, Varun Kumar
    Varghese, Koshy
    Ha, Quang Phuc
    [J]. AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2022, 138
  • [4] Computer Vision-Based Wildfire Smoke Detection Using UAVs
    Rahman, Ehab Ur
    Khan, Muhammad Asghar
    Algarni, Fahad
    Zhang, Yihong
    Uddin, M. Irfan
    Ullah, Insaf
    Ahmad, Hafiz Ishfaq
    [J]. MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, 2021, 2021
  • [5] Construction Site Hazards Identification Using Deep Learning and Computer Vision
    Alateeq, Muneerah M.
    Fathimathul Rajeena, P. P.
    Ali, Mona A. S.
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (03)
  • [6] Computer Vision-Based Wood Identification: A Review
    Silva, Jose Luis
    Bordalo, Rui
    Pissarra, Jose
    de Palacios, Paloma
    [J]. FORESTS, 2022, 13 (12):
  • [7] Structural Identification Using Computer Vision-Based Bridge Health Monitoring
    Khuc, Tung
    Catbas, F. Necati
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2018, 144 (02)
  • [8] A Review of Vision-Based Pothole Detection Methods Using Computer Vision and Machine Learning
    Safyari, Yashar
    Mahdianpari, Masoud
    Shiri, Hodjat
    [J]. SENSORS, 2024, 24 (17)
  • [9] Computer Vision-Based Monitoring of Construction Site Housekeeping: An Evaluation of CNN and Transformer-Based Models
    Shao, Zherui
    Goh, Yang Miang
    Tian, Jing
    Lim, Yu Guang
    Gan, Vincent Jie Long
    [J]. COMPUTING IN CIVIL ENGINEERING 2023-RESILIENCE, SAFETY, AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, : 508 - 515
  • [10] Automated computer vision-based detection of components of under-construction indoor partitions
    Hamledari, Hesam
    McCabe, Brenda
    Davari, Shakiba
    [J]. AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2017, 74 : 78 - 94