Evaluation of milk cathelicidin for detection of dairy sheep mastitis

被引:27
|
作者
Addis, M. F. [1 ]
Tedde, V. [1 ]
Dore, S. [2 ]
Pisanu, S. [1 ]
Puggioni, G. M. G. [1 ]
Roggio, A. M. [1 ]
Pagnozzi, D. [1 ]
Lollai, S. [2 ]
Cannas, E. A.
Uzzau, S. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Porto Conte Ric, SP 55 Porto Conte Capo Caccia, I-07041 Loc Tramariglio, Alghero, Italy
[2] Ist Zooprofilatt Sperimentale Sardegna, CReNMOC Ctr Referenza Nazl Mastopatie Ovini & Cap, Via Duca Abruzzi 8, I-07100 Sassari, Italy
[3] Univ Sassari, Dipartimento Sci Biomed, Viale S Pietro 43-B, I-07100 Sassari, Italy
关键词
subclinical mastitis; ewe; small ruminant; ELISA; MAMMARY EPITHELIAL-CELLS; STAPHYLOCOCCUS-AUREUS MASTITIS; LATENT CLASS ANALYSIS; SOMATIC-CELL; DIAGNOSTIC-TESTS; SUBCLINICAL MASTITIS; BACTERIAL-INFECTION; BOVINE MASTITIS; SMALL RUMINANTS; INTRAMAMMARY INFECTIONS;
D O I
10.3168/jds.2015-10293
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Mastitis due to intramammary infections is one of the most detrimental diseases in dairy sheep farming, representing a major cause of reduced milk productions and quality losses. In particular, subclinical mastitis presents significant detection and control problems, and the availability of tools enabling its timely, sensitive, and specific detection is therefore crucial. We have previously demonstrated that cathelicidins, small proteins implicated in the innate immune defense of the host, are specifically released in milk of mastitic animals by both epithelial cells and neutrophils. Here, we describe the development of an ELISA for milk cathelicidin and assess its value against somatic cell counts (SCC) and bacteriological culture for detection of ewe mastitis. Evaluation of the cathelicidin ELISA was carried out on 705 half-udder milk samples from 3 sheep flocks enrolled in a project for improvement of mammary health. Cathelicidin was detected in 35.3% of milk samples (249/705), and its amount increased with rising SCC values. The cathelicidin-negative (n = 456) and cathelicidin-positive (n = 249) sample groups showed a clear separation in relation to SCC, with median values of 149,500 and 3,300,000 cells/mL, respectively. Upon bacteriological culture, 20.6% (145/705) of the milk samples showed microbial growth, with coagulase-negative staphylococci being by far the most frequent finding. A significant proportion of all bacteriologically positive milk samples were positive for cathelicidin (110/145, 75.9%). Given the lack of a reliable gold standard for defining the true disease status, sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) of the cathelicidin ELISA were assessed by latent class analysis against 2 SCC thresholds and against bacteriological culture results. At an SCC threshold of 500,000 cells/mL, Se and Sp were 92.3 and 92.3% for cathelicidin ELISA, 89.0 and 94.9% for SCC, and 39.4 and 93.6% for bac-teriological culture, respectively. At an SCC threshold of 1,000,000 cells/mL, Se and Sp were 93.3 and 91.9% for cathelicidin ELISA, 80.0 and 97.1% for SCC, and 39.4 and 93.5% for bacteriology, respectively. In view of the results obtained in this study, the measurement of cathelicidin in milk by ELISA can provide added Se while maintaining a high Sp and may therefore improve detection of subclinical mastitis.
引用
收藏
页码:6446 / 6456
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of milk cathelicidin for detection of bovine mastitis
    Addis, M. F.
    Tedde, V.
    Puggioni, G. M. G.
    Pisanu, S.
    Casula, A.
    Locatelli, C.
    Rota, N.
    Bronzo, V.
    Moroni, P.
    Uzzau, S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2016, 99 (10) : 8250 - 8258
  • [2] Detection of Cathelicidin-1 in the Milk as an Early Indicator of Mastitis in Ewes
    Katsafadou, Angeliki I.
    Tsangaris, George Th.
    Vasileiou, Natalia G. C.
    Ioannidi, Katerina S.
    Anagnostopoulos, Athanasios K.
    Billinis, Charalambos
    Fragkou, Ilektra A.
    Papadopoulos, Elias
    Mavrogianni, Vasia S.
    Michael, Charalambia K.
    Addis, M. Filippa
    Fthenakis, George C.
    [J]. PATHOGENS, 2019, 8 (04):
  • [3] Evaluation of a bovine cathelicidin ELISA for detecting mastitis in the dairy buffalo: Comparison with milk somatic cell count and bacteriological culture
    Puggioni, Giulia Maria Grazia
    Tedde, Vittorio
    Uzzau, Sergio
    Guccione, Jacopo
    Ciaramella, Paolo
    Pollera, Claudia
    Moroni, Paolo
    Bronzo, Valerio
    Addis, Maria Filippa
    [J]. RESEARCH IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2020, 128 : 129 - 134
  • [4] The abundance of milk cathelicidin proteins during bovine mastitis
    Smolenski, G. A.
    Wieliczko, R. J.
    Pryor, S. M.
    Broadhurst, M. K.
    Wheeler, T. T.
    Haigh, B. J.
    [J]. VETERINARY IMMUNOLOGY AND IMMUNOPATHOLOGY, 2011, 143 (1-2) : 125 - 130
  • [5] Subclinical mastitis in dairy sheep in Uruguay
    Apolo, A
    Bellizzi, T
    de Lima, D
    Burgueno, M
    [J]. MILKING AND MILK PRODUCTION OF DAIRY SHEEP AND GOATS, 1999, (95): : 168 - 170
  • [6] Study of mastitis in Slovak dairy sheep
    Makovicky, Pavol
    Margetin, Milan
    Makovicky, Peter
    Nagy, Melinda
    Puskas, Andrea
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCES, 2022, 92 (04): : 517 - 519
  • [7] MASTITIS IN DAIRY-CATTLE DETECTION USING MILK CELL COUNTS
    DUIRS, GF
    [J]. NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE, 1980, 140 (04): : 46 - 47
  • [8] Thermal Imaging and Dimensionality Reduction Techniques for Subclinical Mastitis Detection in Dairy Sheep
    Tselios, Christos
    Alexandropoulos, Dimitris
    Pantopoulos, Christos
    Athanasiou, Giorgos
    [J]. ANIMALS, 2024, 14 (12):
  • [9] Effect of Mycoplasma agalactiae mastitis on milk production and composition in Valle dell Belice dairy sheep
    Tolone, Marco
    Sutera, Anna Maria
    Borrello, Silvio
    Tumino, Serena
    Scatassa, Maria Luisa
    Portolano, Baldassare
    Puleio, Roberto
    Nicholas, Robin A. J.
    Loria, Guido Ruggero
    [J]. ITALIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2019, 18 (01) : 1067 - 1072
  • [10] Genetic analysis for mastitis resistance and milk somatic cell score in French Lacaune dairy sheep
    Barillet, F
    Rupp, R
    Mignon-Grasteau, S
    Astruc, JM
    Jacquin, M
    [J]. GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION, 2001, 33 (04) : 397 - 415