Inhibitory effect of intensity and interstimulus interval of conditioning stimuli on somatosensory evoked magnetic fields

被引:7
|
作者
Onishi, Hideaki [1 ]
Sugawara, Kazuhiro [1 ]
Yamashiro, Koya [1 ]
Sato, Daisuke [1 ]
Kirimoto, Hikari [1 ]
Tamaki, Hiroyuki [1 ]
Shirozu, Hiroshi [2 ]
Kameyama, Shigeki [2 ]
机构
[1] Niigata Univ Hlth & Welf, Inst Human Movement & Med Sci, Kita Ku, 1398 Shimami Cho, Niigata 9503198, Japan
[2] Nishi Niigata Chuo Natl Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Niigata, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
electrical stimulation; magnetoencephalography; prepulse inhibition; somatosensory cortex; MEDIAN NERVE-STIMULATION; CORTICAL RESPONSES; CORTEX; MODULATION; MEG; SI; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; DEPRESSION; ULNAR;
D O I
10.1111/ejn.13317
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Magnetoencephalography (MEG) recordings were performed to investigate the inhibitory effects of conditioning stimuli with various types of interstimulus intervals (ISIs) or intensities on somatosensory evoked magnetic fields (SEFs) using a 306-ch whole-head MEG system. Twenty-three healthy volunteers participated in this study. Electrical stimuli were applied to the right median nerve at the wrist. Six pulse trains with ISIs of 500ms were presented in Experiment 1. A paired-pulse paradigm with three kinds of conditioning stimulus (CON) intensities, 500ms before the test stimulus (TS), was applied in Experiment 2. Finally, three CONs 500 or 1000ms before TS were presented in Experiment 3. Three main SEF deflections (N20m, P35m, and P60m) were observed, and the source activities of P35m and P60m significantly decreased after the 2nd pulse of a six pulse trains. These source activities also significantly decreased with increasing intensity of CON. In addition, these attenuations of source activities were affected by CON-CON or CON-TS intervals. These results indicated that the source activities were modulated by the intensity and ISIs of CONs. Furthermore, P35m after the stimulation were very sensitive to CONs; however, the attenuation of P60m after the stimulation lasted for a longer period than that of P35m. Our findings suggest that the conditioning stimulation had inhibitory effects on subsequent evoked cortical responses for more than 500ms. Our results also provide important clues about the nature of short-latency somatosensory responses in human studies.
引用
收藏
页码:2104 / 2113
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Modulation of somatosensory evoked magnetic fields by intensity of interfering stimuli in human somatosensory cortex: An MEG study
    Lim, Manyoel
    Kim, June Sic
    Chung, Chun Kee
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 2012, 61 (03) : 660 - 669
  • [2] Effects of interstimulus interval on somatosensory evoked magnetic fields (SEFs): A hypothesis concerning SEF generation at the primary sensorimotor cortex
    Wikstrom, H
    Huttunen, J
    Korvenoja, A
    Virtanen, J
    Salonen, O
    Aronen, H
    Ilmoniemi, RJ
    [J]. EVOKED POTENTIALS-ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1996, 100 (06): : 479 - 487
  • [3] The effect of interstimulus interval on somatosensory point localization
    Ylioja, S
    Pertovaara, A
    Koivisto, J
    Korvenoja, A
    Artchakov, D
    Carlson, S
    [J]. SOMATOSENSORY AND MOTOR RESEARCH, 2004, 21 (01): : 3 - 7
  • [4] EFFECT OF INTERSTIMULUS INTERVAL AND INTENSITY ON EAR ASYMMETRY FOR NONVERBAL STIMULI IN DICHOTIC LISTENING
    SPREEN, O
    SPELLACY, FJ
    REID, JR
    [J]. NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 1970, 8 (02) : 245 - &
  • [5] The silent period between sounds has a stronger effect than the interstimulus interval on auditory evoked magnetic fields
    Imada, T
    Watanabe, M
    Mashiko, T
    Kawakatsu, M
    Kotani, M
    [J]. ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1997, 102 (01): : 37 - 45
  • [6] The somatosensory evoked magnetic fields
    Kakigi, R
    Hoshiyama, M
    Shimojo, M
    Naka, D
    Yamasaki, H
    Watanabe, S
    Xiang, J
    Maeda, K
    Lam, K
    Itomi, K
    Nakamura, A
    [J]. PROGRESS IN NEUROBIOLOGY, 2000, 61 (05) : 495 - 523
  • [7] EFFECT OF INTERSTIMULUS-INTERVAL ON EVOKED OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS
    LINAGRANADE, G
    COLLET, L
    [J]. HEARING RESEARCH, 1995, 87 (1-2) : 55 - 61
  • [8] EFFECT OF INTERSTIMULUS INTERVAL ON CONDITIONING OF VOLUNTARY INSTRUCTED RESPONSES
    PERLMUTE.LC
    FINK, AM
    TAYLOR, GA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1969, 79 (3P1): : 403 - &
  • [9] VARIATIONS IN INTENSITY, INTERSTIMULUS INTERVAL, AND INTERVAL BETWEEN PRECONDITIONING CS EXPOSURES AND CONDITIONING WITH RATS
    CROWELL, CR
    ANDERSON, DC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1972, 79 (02): : 291 - &
  • [10] Somatosensory evoked magnetic fields in humans
    Kakigi, R
    [J]. SOMATOSENSORY PROCESSING: FROM SINGLE NEURON TO BRAIN IMAGING, 2001, : 241 - 262