Sinus Augmentation with Simultaneous, Non-Submerged, Implant Placement Using a Minimally Invasive Hydraulic Technique

被引:7
|
作者
Chaushu, Liat [1 ]
Chaushu, Gavriel [2 ]
Better, Hadar [4 ]
Naishlos, Sarit [5 ]
Kolerman, Roni [1 ]
Aragoneses, Juan Manuel [6 ]
Calvo-Guirado, Jose Luis [7 ]
Nissan, Joseph [3 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Tel Aviv Univ, Maurice & Gabriela Goldschleger Sch Dent Med, Dept Periodontol & Implant Surg, IL-6997801 Tel Aviv, Israel
[2] Tel Aviv Univ, Maurice & Gabriela Goldschleger Sch Dent Med, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, IL-6997801 Tel Aviv, Israel
[3] Rabin Med Ctr, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, IL-4922297 Petah Tiqwa, Israel
[4] Private Practice Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, IL-6997801 Tel Aviv, Israel
[5] Tel Aviv Univ, Maurice & Gabriela Goldschleger Sch Dent Med, Dept Pedodont, IL-6997801 Tel Aviv, Israel
[6] Univ Federico Henriquez & Carvajal, Dept Dent Res, Santo Domingo 10107, Dominican Rep
[7] Univ Catolica Murcia, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Oral & Implant Surg, Murcia 30107, Spain
[8] Tel Aviv Univ, Maurice & Gabriela Goldschleger Sch Dent Med, Dept Oral Rehabil, IL-6997801 Tel Aviv, Israel
来源
MEDICINA-LITHUANIA | 2020年 / 56卷 / 02期
关键词
sinus lift; Maxillent dental implant; sinus elevation; membrane elevation; ANTRAL MEMBRANE ELEVATION; FRESH-FROZEN ALLOGRAFT; MAXILLARY SINUS; FLOOR AUGMENTATION; ATROPHIC MAXILLA; FOLLOW-UP; BONE; PRESSURE; GRAFT; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.3390/medicina56020075
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background and objectives: To evaluate whether sinus augmentation, using a minimally invasive implant device, via a non-submerged surgical approach, might negatively influence the outcome. Materials and Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted by evaluating patients' files, classifying them into two groups. Fifty patients (22 men 28 women) were included in the study, 25 in each group. The use of an implant device based on residual alveolar ridge height for sinus augmentation, radiographic evaluation, insertion torque, membrane perforation, post-operative healing, and a minimum of 12 months follow-up were evaluated. Results: The mean residual alveolar ridge height was 5.4 mm for the non-submerged group and 4.2 mm for the submerged group. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications (including membrane perforations). The mean insertion torque was 45 N/cm for the study group and 20 N/cm for the control group. Complete soft tissue healing was observed within three weeks. Mean bone gain height was 8 mm for the study and 9.3 mm for the control group. All implants osseointegrated after 6-9 months of healing time. Mean follow-up was 17.5 months, range 12-36 months. Marginal bone loss at last follow-up was not statistically significantly different: 1 mm in the non-submerged vs. 1.2 mm in the submerged group. Conclusions: Submerged and non-submerged healing following maxillary sinus augmentation was comparable provided residual alveolar ridge height >5 mm and insertion torque >25 N/cm.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Osteotome sinus floor elevation and simultaneous, non-submerged implant placement: Case report and literature review
    Ioannidou, E
    Dean, JW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2000, 71 (10) : 1613 - 1619
  • [2] Maxillary Sinus Augmentation Using Hydraulic Pressure by Lateral Approach and Simultaneous Implant Placement: Clinicoradiographic Study
    Bhandari, Shilpy
    Thomas, Raison
    Kumar, Tarun
    Shah, Rucha
    Mehta, Dhoom Singh
    [J]. IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2019, 28 (05) : 514 - 519
  • [3] Simplified osteotome sinus augmentation technique with simultaneous implant placement: A clinical study
    Sforza, Nicola Marco
    Marzadori, Matteo
    Zucchelli, Giovanni
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PERIODONTICS & RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2008, 28 (03) : 291 - 300
  • [4] Histomorphometrical Assessment of Sinus Augmentation Using Allograft (Particles or Block) and Simultaneous Implant Placement
    Chaushu, Liat
    Chaushu, Gavriel
    Kolerman, Roni
    Vered, Marilena
    Naishols, Sarit
    Nissan, Joseph
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [5] Histomorphometrical Assessment of Sinus Augmentation Using Allograft (Particles or Block) and Simultaneous Implant Placement
    Liat Chaushu
    Gavriel Chaushu
    Roni Kolerman
    Marilena Vered
    Sarit Naishlos
    Joseph Nissan
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 10
  • [6] Guided bone regeneration for immediate non-submerged implant placement using bioabsorbable materials in Beagle dogs
    Brunel, G
    Benque, E
    Elharar, F
    Sansac, C
    Duffort, JF
    Barthet, P
    Baysse, E
    Miller, N
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 1998, 9 (05) : 303 - 312
  • [7] Computed Tomographic Evaluation of Sinus Augmentation with Simultaneous Endosseous Implant Placement
    Park, Jun-Beom
    Lim, Hun-Seb
    Yoo, Ki-Beom
    [J]. IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2009, 18 (05) : 380 - 386
  • [8] Sinus floor augmentation with simultaneous implant placement in the severely atrophic maxilla
    Peleg, M
    Mazor, Z
    Chaushu, G
    Garg, AK
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 1998, 69 (12) : 1397 - 1403
  • [9] SINUS FLOOR AUGMENTATION WITH BONE BLOCK GRAFTING AND SIMULTANEOUS IMPLANT PLACEMENT
    Manev, George S.
    Popova, Christina
    [J]. JOURNAL OF IMAB, 2013, 19 (04): : 348 - 354
  • [10] Minimally Invasive Sinus Augmentation Using Ultrasonic Piezoelectric Vibration and Hydraulic Pressure: A Multicenter Retrospective Study
    Kim, Ji-Min
    Sohn, Dong-Seok
    Heo, Jeong-Uk
    Park, Jun-Sub
    Jung, Heui-Seung
    Moon, Jee-Won
    Lee, Ju-Hyoung
    Park, In-Sook
    [J]. IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2012, 21 (06) : 536 - 542