A Pilot Study in Archaeological Metal Detector Geophysical Survey

被引:1
|
作者
Olson, Eric [1 ]
机构
[1] Cuyahoga Community Coll, Dept Liberal Arts & Sci, 11000 West Pleast Valley Rd, Parma, OH 44130 USA
来源
OPEN ARCHAEOLOGY | 2022年 / 8卷 / 01期
关键词
metal detection; geophysical techniques; reconnaissance survey; field methods; North American archaeology;
D O I
10.1515/opar-2022-0243
中图分类号
K85 [文物考古];
学科分类号
0601 ;
摘要
Metal detection (MD) has traditionally been viewed as a limited geophysical survey method for the identification of metal objects below the surface. However, this pilot study examines techniques utilizing the "ground balance" function, common to most modern metal detectors, to identify subsurface magnetic anomalies. The results of surveys have yielded inconclusive results on the use of metal detectors for feature identification. However, the results of this study suggest a high potential for more efficient and more productive archaeological reconnaissance surveys. The ground balance function, when combined with systematic sampling and geographic information systems interpolation methods, yields low-resolution subsoil magnetic susceptibility maps. Compared to other geophysical methods, such as gradiometry or electrical resistivity, the depth range of MD is limited. However, this technique, in upland contexts with shallow subsoils or sites with high potential for recent ground disturbing activities, can reveal subtle changes in the subsurface that traditional MD techniques would miss. Further studies are recommended to explore the many situations in which a metal detector can provide an informative alternative, though not a replacement, for other geophysical survey methods. This pilot study was funded by the National Geographic Society's Early Career Grant program.
引用
收藏
页码:306 / 322
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY IN ARCHAEOLOGICAL FIELD EVALUATION
    Gaffney, Chris
    ARCHAEOLOGICAL PROSPECTION, 2009, 16 (02) : 139 - 140
  • [2] RATHGROGHAN ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY IN A RITUAL LANDSCAPE
    David, Andrew
    ARCHAEOLOGICAL PROSPECTION, 2010, 17 (04) : 273 - 275
  • [3] Geophysical Survey of the Burnum Archaeological Site, Croatia
    Boschi, Federica
    ARCHAEOLOGICAL PROSPECTION, 2011, 18 (02) : 117 - 126
  • [4] ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY BY COMBINATION RPAS AND GEOPHYSICAL METHODS
    Sedina, Jaroslav
    Housarova, Eliska
    Bila, Zdenka
    INFORMATICS, GEOINFORMATICS AND REMOTE SENSING, VOL I (SGEM 2015), 2015, : 989 - 993
  • [5] Geophysical survey in archaeological context: A review from Cyprus
    Vella, Marc-Antoine
    Sarris, Apostolos
    ARCHAEOLOGICAL PROSPECTION, 2022, 29 (03) : 417 - 450
  • [6] THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND GEOPHYSICAL STUDY OF DEFENSE WORKS
    Ivanova, M. G.
    Zhurbin, I. V.
    ARCHAEOLOGY ETHNOLOGY AND ANTHROPOLOGY OF EURASIA, 2010, 38 (03) : 82 - 91
  • [7] Geophysical Survey and Archaeological Data at Masseria Grasso (Benevento, Italy)
    Rizzo, Enzo
    Santoriello, Alfonso
    Capozzoli, Luigi
    De Martino, Gregory
    De Vita, Cristiano Benedetto
    Musmeci, Daniela
    Perciante, Felice
    SURVEYS IN GEOPHYSICS, 2018, 39 (06) : 1201 - 1217
  • [8] Geophysical and Archaeological Survey in Igbo Oritaa (Iwo), Southwest Nigeria
    Martins Olusola Olorunfemi
    Benjamin Adisa Ogunfolakan
    Ademakinwa George Oni
    African Archaeological Review, 2019, 36 : 535 - 552
  • [9] Geophysical-Archaeological Survey in Lake Tequesquitengo, Morelos, Mexico
    Galindo Dominguez, Roberto E.
    Bandy, William L.
    Mortera Gutierrez, Carlos A.
    Ortega Ramirez, Jose
    GEOFISICA INTERNACIONAL, 2013, 52 (03): : 261 - 275
  • [10] Geophysical and Archaeological Survey in Igbo Oritaa (Iwo), Southwest Nigeria
    Olorunfemi, Martins Olusola
    Ogunfolakan, Benjamin Adisa
    Oni, Ademakinwa George
    AFRICAN ARCHAEOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2019, 36 (04) : 535 - 552