In Vivo EPID Dosimetry Detects Interfraction Errors in 3D-CRT of Rectal Cancer

被引:1
|
作者
Peca, S. [1 ,2 ]
Brown, D. [3 ]
Smith, W. L. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Dept Phys & Astron, Calgary, AB, Canada
[2] Tom Baker Canc Clin, Dept Med Phys, Calgary, AB, Canada
[3] Univ Calif San Diego, Moores Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Med & Appl Sci, La Jolla, CA USA
[4] Univ Calgary, Dept Oncol, Calgary, AB, Canada
关键词
In vivo dosimetry; EPID portal dosimetry; adaptive radiotherapy; belly board; rectal cancer; BELLY BOARD; RADIOTHERAPY;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-319-19387-8_130
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND In vivo dosimetry can record the delivered dose during radiotherapy, which may be used to trigger adaptive radiotherapy or other user intervention. We demonstrate the use of our in-house in vivo electronic portal imaging dosimetry in quantifying interfraction dose variability in rectal cancer. METHODS We recorded MV images from nine treatment beams for six patients prone on the belly board, during 4-7 fractions, for a total of 50 measurements. Images were processed with our dosimetry system to produce dose maps. The dose map from the reference fraction was compared to all subsequent ones to determine interfraction delivery variation, yielding 41 dose difference maps. RESULTS We identified a number of dose discrepancies. In several patients, persistent gas bubbles may result in cumulative dose deviations large enough to warrant adaptive radiotherapy. In three patients, discrepancies in dose resulted from variability of patient positioning on the belly board. These issues were not readily identified by standard imaging procedures. CONCLUSION We are developing an open-source in vivo portal dosimetry method to automatically track delivered dose at every fraction. Results can be used to flag unexpected discrepancies, guide adaptive radiotherapy, or warrant image guidance. Further data is needed to test applicability with other treatment sites and setups.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:531 / 534
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cetuximab, Capecitabine,3D-CRT vs capecitabine,3D-CRT as preoperative treatment in rectal cancer
    Mavroeidi, P.
    Varveris, A.
    Spanakis, A.
    Varveris, C.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2018, 127 : S796 - S797
  • [2] Cetuximab, Capecitabine,3D-CRT vs capecitabine,3D-CRT as preoperative treatment in rectal cancer.
    Mavroeidi, P.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2018, 127 : S796 - S796
  • [3] Reducing rectal toxicity in 3D-CRT
    Nature Clinical Practice Urology, 2004, 1 (1): : 8 - 8
  • [4] Catching errors with in vivo EPID dosimetry
    Mans, A.
    Wendling, M.
    McDermott, L. N.
    Sonke, J. -J.
    Tielenburg, R.
    Vijlbrief, R.
    Mijnheer, B.
    van Herk, M.
    Stroom, J. C.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (06) : 2638 - 2644
  • [5] In vivo dosimetry for 3D-CRT treatments n A detailed analysis of 2383 patient measurements
    Nordstrom, F.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2014, 111 : S66 - S67
  • [6] 3D in-vivo dosimetry for novel inverse optimized 3D-CRT technique in craniospinal irradiation
    Biltekin, F.
    Yazici, G.
    Ozyigit, G.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2021, 161 : S1587 - S1588
  • [7] Acute toxicities comparing VMAT versus 3D-CRT in locally advanced rectal cancer
    Zimmermann, M.
    Weick, S.
    Exner, F.
    Richter, A.
    Flentje, M.
    Polat, B.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2019, 133 : S790 - S791
  • [8] Comparison of IMRT Verses 3D-CRT Dose and Acute Toxicity for Rectal Cancer Patients
    Levinson, L.
    Jabbour, S.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 38 (06)
  • [9] Adaptive RT in rectal cancer: Superior to 3D-CRT? A simple question, a complex answer
    Haustermans, Karin
    Roels, Sarah
    Verstraete, Jan
    Depuydt, Tom
    Slagmolen, Pieter
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2007, 183 (Suppl 2) : 21 - 23
  • [10] Adaptive RT in Rectal Cancer: Superior to 3D-CRT? A Simple Question, a Complex Answer
    Karin Haustermans
    Sarah Roels
    Jan Verstraete
    Tom Depuydt
    Pieter Slagmolen
    Strahlentherapie und Onkologie, 2007, 183 : 21 - 23