First response considerations for children exposed to a radiological dispersal device

被引:3
|
作者
Waller, Edward J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ontario, Inst Technol, Fac Energy Syst & Nucl Sci, Oshawa, ON L1H 7K4, Canada
关键词
EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS; POPULATIONS;
D O I
10.1093/rpd/ncq207
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Children are considered a vulnerable population during an accidental or deliberate release of radioactive material to the environment due to the fact that they have more active cell division compared with the adult population and therefore detrimental effects promulgate very quickly. Additionally, physical and social characteristics of children make them more prone to internalise a toxin (for example, children are closer to the ground where heavy aerosols can collect; children also have more relaxed sanitary habits compared with the adult population, which aids in hand-to-mouth transfer of contaminants). To confound matters, many emergency protocols are based upon a reference as opposed to a child. Although numerous radiological response exercises have been conducted in the years post 9/11, very few have utilised children actively in the scenarios. This paper considers observations made during a NATO exercise with scenarios covering radiological releases and which utilised a variety of children as exercise participants.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 67
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Response Tactics for the First 100 Minutes After the Outdoor Detonation of an Explosive Radiological Dispersal Device
    Musolino, Stephen V.
    Harper, F.
    Pfeifer, J.
    [J]. NUCLEAR TERRORISM AND NATIONAL PREPAREDNESS, 2015, : 19 - 23
  • [2] Response of the REWARD detection system to the presence of a Radiological Dispersal Device
    Luis, R.
    Fleta, C.
    Balbuena, J.
    Baptista, M.
    Barros, S.
    Disch, C.
    Jumilla, C.
    Lozano, M.
    Marques, J. G.
    Vaz, P.
    [J]. RADIATION MEASUREMENTS, 2016, 88 : 20 - 32
  • [3] Response of the REWARD detection system to the presence of a Radiological Dispersal Device
    Luis, R.
    Balbuena, J.
    Baptista, M.
    Barros, S.
    Disch, C.
    Pieta, C.
    Jumilla, C.
    Lozano, M.
    Marques, J. G.
    Vaz, P.
    [J]. 2015 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCEMENTS IN NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTATION MEASUREMENT METHODS AND THEIR APPLICATIONS (ANIMMA), 2015,
  • [4] Preventing the radiological dispersal device
    Nilsson, A
    [J]. SECURITY OF RADIOACTIVE SOURCES, 2003, : 27 - 31
  • [5] Emergency response guidance for the first 48 hours after the outdoor detonation of an explosive radiological dispersal device
    Musolino, SV
    Harper, FT
    [J]. HEALTH PHYSICS, 2006, 90 (04): : 377 - 385
  • [6] Using handheld plastic scintillator detectors to triage individuals exposed to a radiological dispersal device
    Manger, R. P.
    Hertel, N. E.
    Burgett, E. A.
    Ansari, A.
    [J]. RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2012, 150 (01) : 101 - 108
  • [7] UPDATED EMERGENCY RESPONSE GUIDANCE FOR THE FIRST 48 H AFTER THE OUTDOOR DETONATION OF AN EXPLOSIVE RADIOLOGICAL DISPERSAL DEVICE
    Musolino, Stephen V.
    Harper, Frederick T.
    Buddemeier, Brooke
    Brown, Michael
    Schlueck, Richard
    [J]. HEALTH PHYSICS, 2013, 105 (01): : 65 - 73
  • [8] Guidelines for first responders based on results from deploying a mockup radiological dispersal device
    Rojas-Palma, Carlos
    Steinhauesler, Friedrich
    Kuca, Petr
    Cespirova, Irena
    Duran, Juraj
    Mann, Cameron
    Sneyers, Liesel
    Smits, Katrien
    Bruggeman, Michel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION, 2020, 40 (04) : 1205 - 1216
  • [9] The Economic Impact of Radiological Dispersal Device Events
    Trost, L. C.
    Vargas, V. N.
    [J]. HEALTH PHYSICS, 2023, 125 (01): : 51 - 51
  • [10] A MCREXS modelling approach for the simulation of a radiological dispersal device
    Ivan, Lucian
    Hummel, David
    Lebel, Luke
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY, 2018, 192 : 551 - 564