Characterization of Contemporary Conventional, Bulk-fill, and Self-adhesive Resin Composite Materials

被引:2
|
作者
David, C. [1 ,2 ]
Cuevas-Suarez, C. E. [3 ]
de Cardoso, G. C. [2 ]
Isolan, C. P. [2 ]
de Moraes, R. R. [2 ]
da Rosa, W. L. O. [2 ]
Munchow, E. A. [4 ]
da Silva, A. F. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Andes Merida, Fac Dent GIBFO, Biopathol Res Grp, Mda, Venezuela
[2] Univ Fed Pelotas, Sch Dent, Grad Program Dent, Pelotas, RS, Brazil
[3] Autonomous Univ Hidalgo State, Acad Area Dent, Dent Mat Lab, Pachuca, Hidalgo, Mexico
[4] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Sch Dent, Dept Conservat Dent, Poa, RS, Brazil
关键词
POLYMERIZATION SHRINKAGE; CONVERSION; STABILITY; MONOMERS; STRESS;
D O I
10.2341/21-063-L
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the physical and biological properties of different types of flowable resin composites and their bonding ability to dentin, comparing the performance of self-adhesive and bulk-fill materials with a conventional control. Methods and Materials: Four flowable resin composites were tested: two self-adhesive (Y-flow [SA_YF]; and Dyad Flow [SA_DF]); one bulk-fill (Filtek Bulk Fill Flow [BF]); and one conventional composite (Opallis Flow [OF]). The microshear bond strength (mu SBS) to dentin (bovine samples) was investigated at 24 hours and 6 months of storage. The materials were also characterized by degree of conversion, cross-link density, water contact angle, color stability, and cell viability (ISO 10993-5/2009) analyses. Data were analyzed using Analysis of Variance and Tukey tests (alpha=0.05). Results: The mu SBS values were higher for control specimens at 24 hours, whereas the resin-dentin bonds were similarly distributed among the groups after aging. Adhesive failure was the most frequent pattern observed at both time intervals. SA_YF was the only material that increased the bond strength over time. Degree of conversion increased in the following order: SA_YF (28.6 +/- 1.4%) < BF (49.7 +/- 0.8%) < OF (60.0 +/- 2.0%) = SA_DF (63.6 +/- 2.3%). Cross-link density was similar among all materials. The self-adhesive composites were more hydrophilic than the other types, with BF showing the lowest water contact angle and the greatest color alteration. All resin composites had a biocompatible behavior. Conclusion: Chemical composition appeared to be an influential factor affecting the physicomechanical and biological behavior of the materials tested.
引用
收藏
页码:392 / 402
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Flexural properties and dentin adhesion in recently developed self-adhesive bulk-fill materials
    Francois, Philippe
    Remadi, Anis
    Le Goff, Stephane
    Abdel-Gawad, Sarah
    Attal, Jean-Pierre
    Dursun, Elisabeth
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL SCIENCE, 2021, 63 (02) : 139 - 144
  • [2] Polymerization Stress and Gap Formation of Self-adhesive, Bulk-fill and Flowable Composite Resins
    Nakano, E. L.
    de Souza, A. S. C.
    Boaro, L. C. C.
    Catalani, L. H.
    Braga, R. R.
    Goncalves, F.
    [J]. OPERATIVE DENTISTRY, 2020, 45 (06) : E308 - E316
  • [3] Structural/Chemical Characterization and Bond Strength of a New Self-Adhesive Bulk-fill Restorative
    Yao, Chenmin
    Ahmed, Mohammed H.
    Zhang, Fei
    Mercelis, Ben
    Van Landuyt, Kirsten L.
    Huang, Cui
    Van Meerbeek, Bart
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADHESIVE DENTISTRY, 2020, 22 (01): : 85 - 97
  • [4] Color of bulk-fill composite resin restorative materials
    Barutcigil, Cagatay
    Barutcigil, Kubilay
    Ozarslan, Mehmet Mustafa
    Dundar, Ayse
    Yilmaz, Burak
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC AND RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2018, 30 (02) : E3 - E8
  • [5] One-year results of a novel self-adhesive bulk-fill restorative and a conventional bulk-fill composite in class II cavities—a randomized clinical split-mouth study
    Fabian Cieplik
    Konstantin J. Scholz
    Julian C. Anthony
    Isabelle Tabenski
    Sarah Ettenberger
    Karl-Anton Hiller
    Wolfgang Buchalla
    Marianne Federlin
    [J]. Clinical Oral Investigations, 2022, 26 : 449 - 461
  • [6] One-year results of a novel self-adhesive bulk-fill restorative and a conventional bulk-fill composite in class II cavities-a randomized clinical split-mouth study
    Cieplik, Fabian
    Scholz, Konstantin J.
    Anthony, Julian C.
    Tabenski, Isabelle
    Ettenberger, Sarah
    Hiller, Karl-Anton
    Buchalla, Wolfgang
    Federlin, Marianne
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2022, 26 (01) : 449 - 461
  • [7] Physicomechanical characterization and biological evaluation of bulk-fill composite resin
    Nascimento, Armiliana Soares
    Lima, Daniel Bezerra
    Lia Fook, Marcus Vinicius
    de Albuquerque, Monica Soares
    de Lima, Eliane Alves
    Sabino, Marcos Antonio
    Pinto Borges, Silvia Maria
    Diniz Filgueira, Pedro Tardelly
    de Sousa, Yasmine Carvalho
    Braz, Rodivan
    [J]. BRAZILIAN ORAL RESEARCH, 2018, 32
  • [8] Fracture Load of Molars Restored with Bulk-fill, Flowable Bulk-fill, and Conventional Resin Composite After Simulated Chewing
    Guerra, L.
    Ramos, R. Q.
    Linhares, L. A.
    Bernardon, J. K.
    Favero, S. S.
    Cesar, P. F.
    Monteiro Junior, S.
    [J]. OPERATIVE DENTISTRY, 2023, 48 (03) : 294 - 303
  • [9] Postoperative sensitivity in posterior restorations restored with self-adhesive and conventional bulk-fill resin composites: A randomized clinical split-mouth trial
    Maghaireh, Ghada A.
    Albashaireh, Zakereyya S.
    Allouz, Hadeel A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2023, 137
  • [10] Incremental and Bulk-fill Techniques With Bulk-fill Resin Composite in Different Cavity Configurations
    Han, S-H
    Park, S-H
    [J]. OPERATIVE DENTISTRY, 2018, 43 (06) : 631 - 641