Drug-Eluting versus Bare-Metal Stents in Large Coronary Arteries

被引:192
|
作者
Kaiser, Christoph [1 ]
Galatius, Soeren [9 ]
Erne, Paul [2 ]
Eberli, Franz [3 ]
Alber, Hannes [10 ]
Rickli, Hans [4 ]
Pedrazzini, Giovanni [5 ]
Hornig, Burkhard [6 ]
Bertel, Osmund [7 ]
Bonetti, Piero [8 ]
De Servi, Stefano [11 ]
Brunner-La Rocca, Hans-Peter [12 ]
Ricard, Ingrid
Pfisterer, Matthias
机构
[1] Univ Basel Hosp, Dept Cardiol, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland
[2] State Hosp, Luzern, Switzerland
[3] Triemli Hosp, Zurich, Switzerland
[4] State Hosp, St Gallen, Switzerland
[5] Cardiocentro, Lugano, Switzerland
[6] Clara Hosp, Basel, Switzerland
[7] Cardiovasc Ctr Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
[8] State Hosp, Chur, Switzerland
[9] Gentofte Univ Hosp, Hellerup, Denmark
[10] Univ Innsbruck Hosp, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
[11] Osped Civile Legnano, Milan, Italy
[12] Maastricht Univ, Med Ctr, Maastricht, Netherlands
来源
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE | 2010年 / 363卷 / 24期
关键词
RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; SMALL VESSELS; BALLOON ANGIOPLASTY; FOLLOW-UP; DISEASE; OUTCOMES; BASKET; REVASCULARIZATION; PLACEMENT; DIAMETER;
D O I
10.1056/NEJMoa1009406
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Recent data have suggested that patients with coronary disease in large arteries are at increased risk for late cardiac events after percutaneous intervention with first-generation drug-eluting stents, as compared with bare-metal stents. We sought to confirm this observation and to assess whether this increase in risk was also seen with second-generation drug-eluting stents. METHODS We randomly assigned 2314 patients needing stents that were 3.0 mm or more in diameter to receive sirolimus-eluting, everolimus-eluting, or bare-metal stents. The primary end point was the composite of death from cardiac causes or nonfatal myocardial infarction at 2 years. Late events (occurring during months 7 to 24) and target-vessel revascularization were the main secondary end points. RESULTS The rates of the primary end point were 2.6% among patients receiving sirolimus-eluting stents, 3.2% among those receiving everolimus-eluting stents, and 4.8% among those receiving bare-metal stents, with no significant differences between patients receiving either drug-eluting stent and those receiving bare-metal stents. There were also no significant between-group differences in the rate of late events or in the rate of death, myocardial infarction, or stent thrombosis. Rates of target-vessel revascularization for reasons unrelated to myocardial infarction were 3.7% among patients receiving sirolimus-eluting stents, 3.1% among those receiving everolimus-eluting stents, and 8.9% among those receiving bare-metal stents. The rate of target-vessel revascularization was significantly reduced among patients receiving either drug-eluting stent, as compared with a bare-metal stent, with no significant difference between the two types of drug-eluting stents. CONCLUSIONS In patients requiring stenting of large coronary arteries, no significant differences were found among sirolimus-eluting, everolimus-eluting, and bare-metal stents with respect to the rate of death or myocardial infarction. With the two drug-eluting stents, similar reductions in rates of target-vessel revascularization were seen.
引用
收藏
页码:2310 / 2319
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Drug-Eluting or Bare-Metal Stents in Large Coronary Arteries
    Aminian, Adel
    Lalmand, Jacques
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2011, 364 (12): : 1179 - 1180
  • [2] Drug-Eluting or Bare-Metal Stents in Large Coronary Arteries REPLY
    Kaiser, Christoph
    Pfisterer, Matthias
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2011, 364 (12): : 1180 - 1180
  • [3] Bare-metal versus drug-eluting coronary stents
    Austin, David
    Pell, Jill P.
    Oldroyd, Keith G.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2008, 358 (23): : 2516 - 2516
  • [4] Long-term outcomes of drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in large coronary arteries
    Hsieh, Ming-Jer
    Chen, Chun-Chi
    Chang, Shang-Hung
    Wang, Chao-Yung
    Lee, Cheng-Hung
    Lin, Fen-Chiung
    Chang, Chee-Jen
    Hsieh, I-Chang
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 168 (04) : 3785 - 3790
  • [5] Bare-metal versus drug-eluting coronary stents - Reply
    Marroquin, Oscar C.
    Mulukutla, Suresh R.
    Kip, Kevin E.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2008, 358 (23): : 2517 - 2518
  • [6] Effectiveness of Drug-Eluting Stents versus Bare-Metal Stents in Large Coronary Arteries in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction
    Sim, Doo Sun
    Jeong, Myung Ho
    Ahn, Youngkeun
    Kim, Young Jo
    Chae, Shung Chull
    Hong, Taek Jong
    Seong, In Whan
    Chae, Jei Keon
    Kim, Chong Jin
    Cho, Myeong Chan
    Seung, Ki Bae
    Park, Seung Jung
    [J]. JOURNAL OF KOREAN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2011, 26 (04) : 521 - 527
  • [7] Drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents for acute coronary syndrome
    Feinberg, Joshua
    Nielsen, Emil Eik
    Greenhalgh, Janette
    Hounsome, Juliet
    Sethi, Naqash J.
    Safi, Sanam
    Gluud, Christian
    Jakobsen, Janus C.
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2017, (08):
  • [8] DRUG-ELUTING VERSUS BARE-METAL STENTING IN LARGE CORONARY ARTERIES IN THE EVENT REGISTRY
    Gordon, Paul Clark
    Keyes, Michelle
    Kennedy, Kevin
    Cohen, David
    Kleiman, Neil
    Piana, Robert
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2011, 57 (14) : E1706 - E1706
  • [9] Are drug-eluting stents superior to bare metal stents in large coronary arteries?
    Steinberg, Daniel H.
    Mishra, Sandeep
    Pinto Slottow, Tina L.
    Javaid, Aamir
    Roy, Probal
    Buch, Ashesh N.
    Okabe, Teruo
    Smith, Kimberly A.
    Gevorkian, Natalie
    Torguson, Rebecca
    Xue, Zhenyi
    Kent, Kenneth M.
    Suddath, William O.
    Satler, Lowell F.
    Pichard, Augusto D.
    Waksman, Ron
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2007, 49 (09) : 33B - 33B
  • [10] Drug-eluting or bare-metal stents?
    Irene Fernández-Ruiz
    [J]. Nature Reviews Cardiology, 2016, 13 (11) : 631 - 631