Who says what? Content and participation characteristics in an online depression community

被引:37
|
作者
Feldhege, Johannes [1 ]
Moessner, Markus [1 ]
Bauer, Stephanie [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Heidelberg, Ctr Psychotherapy Res, Bergheimer Str 54, D-69115 Heidelberg, Germany
关键词
PEER SUPPORT; TOPIC MODELS; PEOPLE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jad.2019.11.007
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: An increasingly important source of informal help for people with depression are online depression communities. This study investigates the prevailing topics in an online depression community and how they are related to participation styles. Methods: A topic model with 26 topics of N = 16,291 posts and N = 71,543 comments of N = 20,037 users in a depression forum on Reddit was created using Latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA). The topics' proportions in the corpus were correlated with five participation measures, i.e. sum of scores, number of comments, posts to comments ratio, posting frequency, and word count. Results: The most common topics were Feelings, Motivation, The Community on Reddit, and Time. There were many significant, small to moderate correlations between topic proportions and participation style measures. The topics Feelings, Offering Support, and Small Talk generated a bigger response in the form of scores and comments. Talking about the past and relationships was more common in longer posts, whereas small talk, offering emotional support, and employing cognitive strategies was more readily found in short comments. Lower posting frequency was related to talking about feelings and romantic relationships. Limitations: No information on users' demographics or mental health status was available. Topic modeling cannot capture elements of style and tone of text. Conclusions: A wide spectrum of topics was uncovered in the topic modeling. Patterns in the correlations point to users with different participation styles preferring different topics. Results of this study can aid the development of online interventions for depression.
引用
收藏
页码:521 / 527
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Who says what? Social networks and digital inequalities in online political expression and content creation
    Zhang, Jiehua
    Cooks, Eric
    Kim, Bumsoo
    Viehouser, Misha
    Barnidge, Matthew
    [J]. INFORMATION SOCIETY, 2024,
  • [2] Who Says What The Law Is?
    Pease, Kelly-Kate S.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL STUDIES REVIEW, 2010, 12 (04) : 628 - 636
  • [3] Who Says What to Whom: Content Versus Source in the Hostile Media Effect
    Gunther, Albert C.
    McLaughlin, Bryan
    Gotlieb, Melissa R.
    Wise, David
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC OPINION RESEARCH, 2017, 29 (03) : 363 - 383
  • [4] WHO SAYS WHAT - A BIBLIOGRAPHIC TREATISE
    QUAGGIN, A
    [J]. CANADIAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 1984, 30 (JUL) : 1445 - 1446
  • [5] WHO SAYS WHAT DRUGS TO LICENSE
    不详
    [J]. NATURE, 1983, 303 (5918) : 559 - 559
  • [6] WHO SHOULD DECIDE WHO SAYS WHAT - REPLY
    TASMAN, W
    [J]. OPHTHALMIC SURGERY AND LASERS, 1984, 15 (07): : 608 - 609
  • [7] Who Clicks on Online Donation? Understanding the Characteristics of SNS Users during Participation in Online Campaigns
    Park, Eun Young
    Rhee, Jin Hwa
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (13)
  • [8] Who says what about e-cigarette regulation? A content analysis of UK newspapers
    Patterson, Chris
    Hilton, S.
    Weishaar, H.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2016, 26
  • [9] MENTAL RETARDATION - WHO SAYS WHAT TO WHOM
    GOLDBERG, II
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MENTAL DEFICIENCY, 1966, 71 (01): : 4 - &
  • [10] The reputation. Who says what to whom
    Deprez, Stanislas
    [J]. REVUE PHILOSOPHIQUE DE LA FRANCE ET DE L ETRANGER, 2017, 142 (01): : 131 - 132