Prevalence and associated factors of cancer screening: Why are so many older Mexican American women never screened?

被引:53
|
作者
Wu, ZH
Black, SA
Markides, KS
机构
[1] Univ Texas, Med Branch, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Galveston, TX 77555 USA
[2] Univ Texas, Med Branch, Sealy Ctr Aging, Galveston, TX 77555 USA
[3] Univ Texas, Med Branch, Dept Prevent Med & Community Hlth, Galveston, TX 77555 USA
关键词
cancer screening; mammography; Pap test; Mexican American; elderly women;
D O I
10.1006/pmed.2001.0880
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objectives. The aim of this study was to identify patterns of mammogram and Papanicolaou (Pap) screenings among Mexican American women ages 67 and over. Methods. Data on 1,403 Mexican American women from the Hispanic Established Population for the Epidemiological Study of the Elderly, a cohort study of community-dwelling Mexican Americans ages 65 years or over from the southwestern United States, were analyzed. Results. Mexican American women age 75 or older were less likely to ever have had breast or cervical screening than women ages 67 to 74, even controlling for sociodemographic, cultural, and selected health factors. Overall, fewer medical conditions and never having had a hysterectomy were found to be associated with a decreased chance of ever having had a mammogram or a Pap test. Women who lacked insurance coverage and had fewer doctor visits were less likely to ever have had a mammogram, whereas women with low education, low acculturation, and lower cognitive status scores were less likely to ever have had a Pap test. Conclusions. If these results withstand more detailed studies (e.g., with the addition of important variables such as awareness), better communication with health professional doctors and improvement of access to heath care services should increase rates of both maimmogram and Pap screenings. (C) 2001 American Health Foundation and Academic Press.
引用
收藏
页码:268 / 273
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cervical Cancer Screening and Older Mexican American Women A Case Study
    Flores, Bertha Penny
    Volker, Deborah L.
    RESEARCH IN GERONTOLOGICAL NURSING, 2011, 4 (01) : 3 - 8
  • [2] Factors Associated with Never Being Screened for Colorectal Cancer
    Stanley, Sandte L.
    King, Jessica B.
    Thomas, Cheryll C.
    Richardson, Lisa C.
    JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2013, 38 (01) : 31 - 39
  • [3] Factors Associated with Never Being Screened for Colorectal Cancer
    Sandte L. Stanley
    Jessica B. King
    Cheryll C. Thomas
    Lisa C. Richardson
    Journal of Community Health, 2013, 38 : 31 - 39
  • [4] Socioeconomic Factors, Immigration Status, and Cancer Screening Among Mexican American Women Aged 75 and Older
    Reyes-Ortiz, Carlos A.
    Markides, Kyriakos S.
    HEALTH CARE FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 31 (12) : 1068 - 1081
  • [5] Why did so many women develop cancer?
    Jones, Ronald W.
    NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2010, 123 (1313) : 91 - 92
  • [6] Prevalence and Factors Associated with Colorectal Cancer Screening in Canadian Women
    Brennenstuhl, Sarah
    Fuller-Thomson, Esme
    Popova, Svetlana
    JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2010, 19 (04) : 775 - 784
  • [7] Predictors of Cervical Cancer Screening for Rarely or Never Screened Rural Appalachian Women
    Hatcher, Jennifer
    Studts, Christina R.
    Dignan, Mark B.
    Turner, Lisa M.
    Schoenberg, Nancy E.
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE FOR THE POOR AND UNDERSERVED, 2011, 22 (01) : 176 - 193
  • [8] Why did so many women develop cancer? Response
    Bryder, Linda
    NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2010, 123 (1313) : 92 - 94
  • [9] The prevalence and predictive factors of breast cancer screening among older Ghanaian women
    Agyemang, Akosua F.
    Tei-Muno, Agnes Naki
    Dzomeku, Veronica Millicent
    Nakua, Emmanuel Kweku
    Duodu, Precious Adade
    Duah, Henry Ofori
    Bentil, Anna Boakyewaa
    Agbadi, Pascal
    HELIYON, 2020, 6 (04)
  • [10] Patient factors associated with breast cancer screening among older women
    Marwill, SL
    Freund, KM
    Barry, PP
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 1996, 44 (10) : 1210 - 1214