Integrating associational resistance into arable weed management

被引:7
|
作者
Gunton, Richard M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leeds, Inst Integrat & Comparat Biol, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
关键词
Agroecology; Diversity; Herbivore; Natural enemy; Resource concentration; Spatial scale; Ecosystem service; HOST-PLANT SELECTION; CONSERVATION BIOLOGICAL-CONTROL; NATURAL ENEMIES; PEST-MANAGEMENT; BRASSICA-OLERACEA; INSECT PESTS; SLUG DAMAGE; AGRICULTURAL LANDSCAPES; ASYMMETRIC COMPETITION; BRUSSELS SPROUTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.agee.2011.05.022
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
This review considers how natural weedy vegetation affects herbivory in arable crops, and how such 'associational effects may be set against other factors affecting crop yield that are better understood, such as competition for resources. Natural vegetation may reduce or increase herbivory by three broad categories of mechanisms: (1) directly, by altering the behaviour of herbivores, (2) indirectly by altering the behaviour of natural enemies or (3) indirectly by altering crop plants' growth and physiology. The first category includes natural vegetation diverting herbivores away from crop plants, which appears to be the most beneficial effect, but this is sensitive to the spatial scales at which herbivores forage. There is little evidence that mechanisms in the second category significantly affect crop performance. The viability of crops is critically dependent on the dynamics of plant-plant interactions (the third category) and their interactions with associational effects. While few published studies demonstrate the potential for weedy vegetation to improve crop yields, there is clear scope for optimising weed management with regard to economics, pesticide use and conservation. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:129 / 136
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Integrating Genetics and Weed Management
    Levy, Sarah E.
    Davis, Thomas M.
    [J]. HORTSCIENCE, 2014, 49 (09) : S336 - S337
  • [2] Weed management in sugarcane intercropped with arable crops in Nigeria
    A. A. Ndarubu
    L. D. Busari
    S. M. Misari
    [J]. Sugar Tech, 2000, 2 (3) : 34 - 41
  • [3] SimWeed - A model to assess weed management strategies in arable farming
    Schwarz, J
    Ackermann, I
    [J]. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PFLANZENKRANKHEITEN UND PFLANZENSCHUTZ-JOURNAL OF PLANT DISEASES AND PROTECTION, 2000, : 237 - 243
  • [4] Weed communities associated with arable Saskatchewan farm management systems
    Leeson, JY
    Sheard, JW
    Thomas, AG
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE, 2000, 80 (01) : 177 - 185
  • [5] Integrating Insect, Resistance, and Floral Resource Management in Weed Control Decision-Making
    DiTommaso, Antonio
    Averill, Kristine M.
    Hoffmann, Michael P.
    Fuchsberg, Jeffrey R.
    Losey, John E.
    [J]. WEED SCIENCE, 2016, 64 (04) : 743 - 756
  • [6] Herbicide Resistance in Weed Management
    Matzrafi, Maor
    Peleg, Zvi
    Lati, Ran
    [J]. AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2021, 11 (02):
  • [7] Weed seedbanks in arable fields: effects of management practices and surrounding landscape
    Jose-Maria, L.
    Sans, F. X.
    [J]. WEED RESEARCH, 2011, 51 (06) : 631 - 640
  • [8] Biodiversity-based options for arable weed management. A review
    Sandrine Petit
    Stéphane Cordeau
    Bruno Chauvel
    David Bohan
    Jean-Philippe Guillemin
    Christian Steinberg
    [J]. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 2018, 38
  • [9] Biodiversity-based options for arable weed management. A review
    Petit, Sandrine
    Cordeau, Stephane
    Chauvel, Bruno
    Bohan, David
    Guillemin, Jean-Philippe
    Steinberg, Christian
    [J]. AGRONOMY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 38 (05)
  • [10] The dynamics of experimental arable weed communities under different management practices
    McCloskey, M
    Firbank, LG
    Watkinson, AR
    Webb, DJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VEGETATION SCIENCE, 1996, 7 (06) : 799 - 808