Psychometric properties of the Actively Open-minded Thinking scale

被引:15
|
作者
Janssen, Eva M. [1 ]
Verkoeijen, Peter P. J. L. [2 ,3 ]
Heijltjes, Anita E. G. [3 ]
Mainhard, Tim [1 ]
van Peppen, Lara M. [2 ]
van Gog, Tamara [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Dept Educ, Heidelberglaan 1, NL-3584 CS Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus Univ, Dept Psychol Educ & Child Studies, Burgemeester Oudlaan 50, NL-3062 PA Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Avans Univ Appl Sci, Learning & Innovat Ctr, Hogeschoollaan 1, NL-4818 CR Breda, Netherlands
关键词
Dutch-language version of the Actively open-Minded Thinking scale; Thinking dispositions; Rational thinking; Reasoning and decision-making; Assessment; Mokken scale analysis; COGNITIVE REFLECTION TEST; LATENT CLASS APPROACH; ITEM RESPONSE THEORY; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; DOMAIN SPECIFICITY; TEST-SCORE; CONCEPTUAL ECOLOGY; RATIONAL THINKING; MYSIDE BIAS; TEACHERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100659
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The Actively Open-minded Thinking scale (AOT; Stanovich & West, 2007) is a questionnaire that is used to measure the disposition towards rational thinking as a single psychological trait. Yet, despite its frequent use, also in abbreviated form, it is still unclear whether sumscores of the AOT can actually be used to order individuals on their disposition towards actively open-minded thinking and whether the questionnaire can be validly shortened. The present study aimed to obtain a valid and shorter AOT. We conducted Mokken scale analyses on the (Dutch) AOT using two samples of higher education students (N = 930; N = 509). Our analyses showed that none of the 41 items could discriminate sufficiently between respondents with varying latent trait levels. Furthermore, no item-set of the AOT could be obtained to validly order individuals on the assumed latent trait, which is a crucial assumption when using it in research. Consequently, it is questionable whether scores on the AOT provide insights into the concept it aims to measure.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Actively open-minded thinking in politics
    Baron, Jonathan
    COGNITION, 2019, 188 : 8 - 18
  • [2] Actively Open-Minded Thinking and Its Measurement
    Stanovich, Keith E.
    Toplak, Maggie E.
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENCE, 2023, 11 (02)
  • [3] The impact of actively open-minded thinking on social media communication
    Carpenter, Jordan
    Preotiuc-Pietro, Daniel
    Clark, Jenna
    Flekova, Lucie
    Smith, Laura
    Kern, Margaret L.
    Buffone, Anneke
    Ungar, Lyle
    Seligman, Martin
    JUDGMENT AND DECISION MAKING, 2018, 13 (06): : 562 - 574
  • [4] Actively open-minded thinking: development of a shortened scale and disentangling attitudes towards knowledge and people
    Svedholm-Hakkinen, Annika M.
    Lindeman, Marjaana
    THINKING & REASONING, 2018, 24 (01) : 21 - 40
  • [5] The role of actively open-minded thinking in information acquisition, accuracy, and calibration
    Haran, Uriel
    Ritov, Ilana
    Mellers, Barbara A.
    JUDGMENT AND DECISION MAKING, 2013, 8 (03): : 188 - 201
  • [6] Context and Implications Document for: Actively open-minded thinking in American adolescents
    Emlen Metz, S.
    Baelen, Rebecca N.
    Yu, Alisa
    REVIEW OF EDUCATION, 2020, 8 (03): : 800 - 805
  • [7] Actively open-minded thinking is key to combating fake news: A multimethod study
    Mirhoseini, Mahdi
    Early, Spencer
    El Shamy, Nour
    Hassanein, Khaled
    INFORMATION & MANAGEMENT, 2023, 60 (03)
  • [8] Reasoning independently of prior belief and individual differences in actively open-minded thinking
    Stanovich, KE
    West, RF
    JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 89 (02) : 342 - 357
  • [9] Actively Open-Minded Thinking, Personality and Critical Thinking in Spanish Adolescents: A Correlational and Predictive Study
    Merma-Molina, Gladys
    Gavilan-Martin, Diego
    Urrea-Solano, Mayra
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INSTRUCTION, 2022, 15 (02) : 579 - 600
  • [10] Political campaigns and open-minded thinking
    Kam, Cindy D.
    JOURNAL OF POLITICS, 2006, 68 (04): : 931 - 945