Bone graft for revision hip arthroplasty

被引:88
|
作者
Gamradt, SC [1 ]
Lieberman, JR [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Hlth Sci Ctr, David Geffen Sch Med, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/01.blo.0000096814.78689.77
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Revision total hip arthroplasty often presents surgeons with difficult bone loss problems. The selection of an appropriate bone graft is influenced by the size of the bone defect, the location, the biology of the bone graft site, and whether the graft is required for structural support. Autogenous bone graft remains the gold standard bone graft material but there only is a limited amount available and there is morbidity associated with the harvesting of these grafts. The most frequently used bone graft materials include autogenous iliac crest bone graft, cancellous allograft chips, dernineralized bone matrix, and bulk structural allografts (femoral head, distal or proximal femoral allograft, whole acetabuli, and femoral strut grafts). It often is difficult to determine on plain radiographs whether nonstructural grafts actually incorporate into the host bone. Recently, attention has focused on the use of new materials for bone grafting including: new demineratized bone matrices, ceramics, autologous platelet concentrates, recombinant proteins, and stem cells. The purpose of this review was to assess the biologic potential of these nonstructurall grafts in revision hip arthroplasty and their limitations. Are these agents actually incorporating into host bone? Future bone graft options, including tissue engineering and gene therapy will be discussed briefly.
引用
收藏
页码:183 / 194
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Bone graft substitutes for acetabular reconstruction in revision total hip arthroplasty
    Pitto, RP
    BIOCERAMICS, 2000, 192-1 : 947 - 950
  • [2] Bone graft substitutes for acetabular reconstruction in revision total hip arthroplasty
    Pitto, Rocco P.
    Key Engineering Materials, 2001, 192-195 : 947 - 950
  • [3] Acetabular reconstruction in revision total hip arthroplasty using a bone graft substitute
    Pitto, RP
    Hohmann, D
    BIOCERAMICS, VOL 10, 1997, : 169 - 172
  • [4] One-Stage Revision of Infected Total Hip Arthroplasty with Bone Graft
    Rudelli, Sergio
    Uip, David
    Honda, Emerson
    Lima, Ana Lucia L. M.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2008, 23 (08): : 1165 - 1177
  • [5] Biphasic bone graft substitute in revision total hip arthroplasty with significant acetabular bone defects
    McPherson, E. J.
    Stavrakis, A. I.
    Chowdhry, M.
    Curtin, N. L.
    V. Dipane, M.
    Crawford, B. M.
    BONE & JOINT OPEN, 2022, 3 (12): : 991 - 997
  • [6] Allogenic bone graft for femoral defect augmentation in hip revision arthroplasty: A case series
    Wirries, Nils
    Skutek, Michael
    Oergel, Marcus
    Budde, Stefan
    Derksen, Alexander
    Windhagen, Henning
    Floerkemeier, Thilo
    ORTHOPEDIC REVIEWS, 2020, 12 (01) : 8 - 11
  • [7] Bone grafts, bone graft extenders, substitutes and enhancers for acetabular reconstruction in revision total hip arthroplasty
    Pierannunzii, Luca
    Zagra, Luigi
    EFORT OPEN REVIEWS, 2016, 1 (12): : 431 - 439
  • [8] Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Without Bone Graft of High-Grade Acetabular Defects
    Rees, Harold W.
    Fung, Daniel A.
    Cerynik, Douglas L.
    Amin, Nirav H.
    Johanson, Norman A.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2012, 27 (01): : 41 - 47
  • [9] A Case of Cementless Impaction Bone Graft in a Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Requiring Calcar Reconstruction
    Ishiguro, Shigeo
    Asanuma, Kunihiro
    Tamaki, Tatsuya
    Oinuma, Kazuhiro
    Sudo, Akihiro
    CASE REPORTS IN ORTHOPEDICS, 2021, 2021
  • [10] Occlusion of an Aortobifemoral Graft after Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Ishmael, Chad R.
    Galey, Scott A.
    Gatto, Jonathan D.
    Zeegen, Erik N.
    ARTHROPLASTY TODAY, 2021, 8 : 63 - 68