Clinical Information Transfer between EMS Staff and Emergency Medicine Assistants during Handover of Trauma Patients

被引:12
|
作者
Yegane, Seyedeh Almas Fahim [1 ]
Shahrami, Ali [1 ]
Hatamabadi, Hamid Reza [1 ]
Hosseini-Zijoud, Seyed-Mostafa [2 ]
机构
[1] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Imam Hossein Hosp, Dept Emergency Med, Tehran, Iran
[2] Baqiyatallah Univ Med Sci, Nephrol & Urol Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
关键词
clinical audit; clinical handover; emergency; ISBAR; trauma patients; NURSING HANDOFFS; SIGN-OUT; COMMUNICATION; CARE; TOOL;
D O I
10.1017/S1049023X17006562
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Introduction: Clinical handover by Emergency Medical Services (EMS) staff, as the first people who have contact with trauma patients, in the emergency department (ED), is very important. Therefore, effective communication to transfer clinical information about patients in a concise, rational, clear, and time-bound manner is essential. In Iran, the transfer of necessary information in clinical handover in EDs was carried out orally and without following standard instructions. This study aimed to audit the current clinical handover according to the Identify, Situation, Background, Assessment, and Recommendation (ISBAR) tool and survey the effect of training the ISBAR tool to Emergency Medicine Assistants (EMAs) and EMS staff on improvement of the clinical handover of patients to the ED. Methods: This is a clinical audit study in three phases in Imam Hossein Hospital (Tehran, Iran) during 2016. In the first phase, the clinical handover between EMS staff and EMAs for 178 trauma patients admitted to the ED using ISBAR was audited and information was recorded. In the second phase, the correct approach of clinical handover according to the ISBAR tool was taught to EMS staff and EMAs using pamphlets and lectures. In the third phase, again, the clinical handover between EMS staff and EMAs for 168 trauma patients admitted to the ED was audited using the ISBAR tool and information was recorded. At the end, clinical audit assessment indicators of handover were evaluated before and after training. Results: Clinical audit of the current situation in the ED showed that the clinical handover process does not follow standard ISBAR (0.0%). However, after training, 65.3% of clinical handover processes were performed in accordance with ISBAR. In the current study, there was an increase in all parameters of the ISBAR tool after training, most of which increased significantly compared to the first phase of the study (before the intervention). Conclusions: Findings demonstrate that patient handover in the ED did not initially follow the ISBAR standard guideline. After providing education as pamphlets and lectures to EMS staff and EMAs, a high percentage of patient handovers were conducted in accordance with the ISBAR instructions.
引用
收藏
页码:541 / 547
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Barriers to effective EMS to emergency department information transfer at patient handover: A systematic review
    Troyer, Lindsay
    Brady, William
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2020, 38 (07): : 1494 - 1503
  • [2] Information Loss in Emergency Medical Services Handover of Trauma Patients
    Carter, Alix J. E.
    Davis, Kimberly A.
    Evans, Leigh V.
    Cone, David C.
    PREHOSPITAL EMERGENCY CARE, 2009, 13 (03) : 280 - 285
  • [3] Quality of information given during handover to recovery staff: a clinical audit
    Hawken, J.
    O'Brien, A.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2015, 70 : 25 - 25
  • [4] Deficits in information transfer between anaesthesiologist and postanaesthesia care unit staff: an analysis of patient handover
    Siddiqui, Naveed
    Arzola, Cristian
    Iqbal, Mirza
    Sritharan, Kobika
    Guerina, Laarni
    Chung, Frances
    Friedman, Zeev
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2012, 29 (09) : 438 - 445
  • [5] Review article: Improving the hospital clinical handover between paramedics and emergency department staff in the deteriorating patient
    Dawson, Sarah
    King, Lindy
    Grantham, Hugh
    EMERGENCY MEDICINE AUSTRALASIA, 2013, 25 (05) : 393 - 405
  • [6] Lost information during the handover of critically injured trauma patients: a mixed-methods study
    Zakrison, Tanya Liv
    Rosenbloom, Brittany
    McFarlan, Amanda
    Jovicic, Aleksandra
    Soklaridis, Sophie
    Allen, Casey
    Schulman, Carl
    Namias, Nicholas
    Rizoli, Sandro
    BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2016, 25 (12) : 929 - 936
  • [7] EVALUATION OF EMERGENCY CARE IN CLINICAL TRIAL PARTICIPANTS: IS THERE COMMUNICATION BETWEEN RESEARCH STAFF AND TREATING PHYSICIANS DURING A MEDICAL EMERGENCY?
    Marsh, S. L.
    Chung, S. S.
    EPILEPSIA, 2009, 50 : 60 - 60
  • [8] Mortality in trauma patients admitted during, before, and after national academic emergency medicine and trauma surgery meeting dates in Japan
    Yumoto, Tetsuya
    Naito, Hiromichi
    Ihoriya, Hiromi
    Yorifuji, Takashi
    Nakao, Atsunori
    PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (01):
  • [9] Zero Waste Emergency Medicine: A Visual Aid for Clinical Decision Rules in Minor Head Trauma Injury Patients
    Sudario, G.
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2018, 72 (04) : S157 - S158
  • [10] Staff perceptions of best practice for information transfer about multitrauma patients on discharge from the emergency department: a focus group study
    Calleja, Pauline
    Aitken, Leanne
    Cooke, Marie
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2016, 25 (19-20) : 2863 - 2873