Integrating agri-environmental indicators, ecosystem services assessment, life cycle assessment and yield gap analysis to assess the environmental sustainability of agriculture

被引:18
|
作者
Bergez, J-E [1 ]
Bethinger, A. [2 ]
Bockstaller, C. [3 ]
Cederberg, C. [4 ]
Ceschia, E. [5 ]
Guilpart, N. [6 ]
Lange, S. [7 ,8 ]
Muller, F. [7 ]
Reidsma, P. [9 ]
Riviere, C. [2 ]
Schader, C. [10 ]
Therond, O. [3 ]
van der Werf, H. M. G. [11 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toulouse, INRAE, AGIR, F-31320 Castanet Tolosan, France
[2] INRAE, DEPE, Paris, France
[3] Univ Lorraine, INRAE, LAE, F-68000 Colmar, France
[4] Chalmers Univ Technol, Dept Space Earth & Environm, Div Phys Resource Theory, Gothenburg, Sweden
[5] Univ Toulouse, CNES CNRS INRA IRD UPS, CESBIO, Toulouse, France
[6] Univ Paris Saclay, AgroParisTech, INRAE, UMR Agron, F-78850 Thiverval Grignon, France
[7] Christian Albrechts Univ Kiel, Inst Nat Resource Conservat, Olshausenstr 75, D-24118 Kiel, Germany
[8] Leibniz Univ Hannover, Inst Phys Geog & Landscape Ecol, Schneiderberg 50, D-30167 Hannover, Germany
[9] Wageningen Univ, Plant Prod Syst Grp, POB 430, NL-6700 AK Wageningen, Netherlands
[10] Res Inst Organ Agr FiBL, Frick, Switzerland
[11] Inst Agro Rennes Angers, INRAE, SAS, F-35000 Rennes, France
关键词
Multi-criteria assessment; Environmental issues; Environmental policies; Conceptual framework; FARMING SYSTEMS; CROP; INTENSIFICATION; BIODIVERSITY; OPPORTUNITIES; FRAMEWORK; IMPACTS; FOOD;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109107
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Agriculture's primary function is the production of food, feed, fibre and fuel for the fast-growing world popu-lation. However, it also affects human health and ecosystem integrity. Policymakers make policies in order to avoid harmful impacts. How to assess such policies is a challenge. In this paper, we propose a conceptual framework to help evaluate the impacts of agricultural policies on the environment. Our framework represents the global system as four subsystems and their interactions. These four components are the cells of a 2 by 2 matrix [Agriculture, Rest of the word]; [Socio-eco system, Ecological system]. We then developed a set of in-dicators for environmental issues and positioned these issues in the framework. To assess these issues, we used four well-known existing approaches: Life Cycle Assessment, Ecosystem Services Analysis, Yield Gap Analysis and Agro-Environmental Indicators. Using these four approaches together provided a more holistic view of the impacts of a given policy on the system. We then applied our framework on existing cover crop policies using an extensive literature survey and analysing the different environmental issues mobilised by the four assessment approaches. This demonstration case shows that our framework may be of help for a full systemic assessment. Despite their differences (aims, scales, standardization, data requirements, etc.), it is possible and profitable to use the four approaches together. This is a significant step forward, though more work is needed to produce a genuinely operational tool.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Selecting agri-environmental indicators to facilitate monitoring and assessment of EU agri-environmental measures effectiveness
    Zalidis, GC
    Tsiafouli, MA
    Takavakoglou, V
    Bilas, G
    Misopolinos, N
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2004, 70 (04) : 315 - 321
  • [2] Structural changes and agri-environmental assessment of agriculture in Bulgaria
    Doitchinova, Julia
    Harizanova, Hristina
    Stoyanova, Zornitsa
    [J]. RISK IN THE FOOD ECONOMY - THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2017, : 231 - 243
  • [3] A Comparative View of Agri-Environmental Indicators and Stakeholders' Assessment of Their Quality
    Spanu, Ionut-Alexandru
    Ozunu, Alexandru
    Petrescu, Dacinia Crina
    Petrescu-Mag, Ruxandra Malina
    [J]. AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2022, 12 (04):
  • [4] Environmental sustainability of conventional and organic farming: Accounting for ecosystem services in life cycle assessment
    Boone, Lieselot
    Roldan-Ruiz, Isabel
    Van Linden, Veerle
    Muylle, Hilde
    Dewulf, Jo
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 695
  • [5] Selection and application of agri-environmental indicators to assess potential technologies for nutrient recovery in agriculture
    Pereira Andrade, Edilene
    Bonmati, August
    Jimenez Esteller, Laureano
    Brunn, Sander
    Stoumann Jensen, Lars
    Meers, Erik
    Anton, Assumpcio
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2022, 134
  • [6] Development of agri-environmental indicators to assess dairy farm sustainability in Quebec, Eastern Canada
    Belanger, Valerie
    Vanasse, Anne
    Parent, Diane
    Allard, Guy
    Pellerin, Doris
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2012, 23 : 421 - 430
  • [7] Towards a comprehensive sustainability methodology to assess anthropogenic impacts on ecosystems: Review of the integration of Life Cycle Assessment, Environmental Risk Assessment and Ecosystem Services Assessment
    Pena, Laura Vittoria De Luca
    Taelman, Sue Ellen
    Preat, Nils
    Boone, Lieselot
    Van der Biest, Katrien
    Custodio, Marco
    Lucas, Simon Hernandez
    Everaert, Gert
    Dewulf, Jo
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 808
  • [8] Optimizing agri-environmental program to reduce negative environmental impact in the Allgaeu region using life cycle assessment
    Haas, G
    Wetterich, F
    [J]. BERICHTE UBER LANDWIRTSCHAFT, 2000, 78 (01): : 92 - 105
  • [9] Combining ecosystem indicators and life cycle assessment for environmental assessment of demersal trawling in Tunisia
    Abdou, Khaled
    Le Loc'h, Francois
    Gascuel, Didier
    Romdhane, Mohamed Salah
    Aubin, Joel
    Ben Rais Lasram, Frida
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2020, 25 (01): : 105 - 119
  • [10] Combining ecosystem indicators and life cycle assessment for environmental assessment of demersal trawling in Tunisia
    Khaled Abdou
    François Le Loc’h
    Didier Gascuel
    Mohamed Salah Romdhane
    Joël Aubin
    Frida Ben Rais Lasram
    [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2020, 25 : 105 - 119