The dichotomy of the application of a systems approach in UK healthcare the challenges and priorities for implementation

被引:10
|
作者
Pickup, Laura [1 ]
Lang, Alexandra [2 ]
Atkinson, Sarah [3 ]
Sharples, Sarah [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Exeter, Sch Med, NIHR CLAHRC South West Peninsula PenCLAHRC, Exeter, Devon, England
[2] Univ Nottingham, Inst Mental Hlth, Div Psychiat & Appl Psychol, NIHR MindTech Healthcare Technol Cooperat,Sch Med, Nottingham, England
[3] Univ Nottingham, Human Factors Res Grp, Fac Engn, Nottingham, England
关键词
Systems; patient safety; human factors; ergonomics; healthcare; PATIENT SAFETY; ERGONOMICS; BLOOD; TECHNOLOGY;
D O I
10.1080/00140139.2017.1306632
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
There is increasing demand for a systems approach within national healthcare guidelines to provide a systematic and sustainable framework for improvements in patient safety. Supported by this is the growing body of evidence within Human Factors/Ergonomics (HFE) healthcare literature for the inclusion of this approach in health service design, provision and evaluation. This paper considers the current interpretation of this within UK healthcare systems and the dichotomy which exists in the challenge to implement a systems approach. Three case studies, from primary and secondary care, present a systems approach, offering a novel perspective of primary care and blood sampling. These provide practical illustrations of how HFE methods have been used in collaboration with healthcare staff to understand the system for the purpose of professional education, design and safety of clinical activities. The paper concludes with the challenge for implementation and proposes five roles for systems HFE to support patient safety.Practitioner Summary: healthcare is classified as a complex and dynamic system within this paper and as such HFE system methods are presented as desirable to understand the system, to develop HFE tools, to deliver education and integrate HFE within healthcare systems.
引用
收藏
页码:15 / 25
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Personalised medicine in the UK: challenges of implementation and impact on healthcare system
    Anna Pokorska-Bocci
    Mark Kroese
    Gurdeep S Sagoo
    Alison Hall
    Hilary Burton
    [J]. Genome Medicine, 6
  • [2] Personalised medicine in the UK: challenges of implementation and impact on healthcare system
    Pokorska-Bocci, Anna
    Kroese, Mark
    Sagoo, Gurdeep S.
    Hall, Alison
    Burton, Hilary
    [J]. GENOME MEDICINE, 2014, 6
  • [3] Implementation Science: Priorities for Healthcare in Dementia
    Maidment, Ian
    Ballard, Clive
    Fox, Chris
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL PSYCHOGERIATRICS, 2019, 31 : 35 - 35
  • [4] Identifying the research priorities of healthcare professionals in UK vascular surgery: modified Delphi approach
    Smith, G. E.
    Long, J.
    Wallace, T.
    Carradice, D.
    Chetter, I. C.
    [J]. BJS OPEN, 2021, 5 (02):
  • [5] Healthcare Information Systems (HIS): Implementation Challenges in Developing Countries
    Rahman, Shafiqur
    Islam, Aminul
    [J]. BANGLADESH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 23 (02): : 314 - 326
  • [6] Challenges and opportunities for Mohs surgery implementation in African healthcare systems
    Inshutiyimana, Samuel
    Uwishema, Olivier
    Ramadan, Nagham
    Al Maaz, Zeina
    Wojtara, Magda
    [J]. BMC SURGERY, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [7] Blockchain Adoption, Implementation and Integration in Healthcare Application Systems
    Bodeis, William
    Corser, George P.
    [J]. SOUTHEASTCON 2021, 2021, : 525 - 527
  • [8] Challenges Affecting the Implementation of the Integrated Approach to Mental Healthcare at PHC Clinics
    Lavhelani, Robert N.
    Khoza, Lunic B.
    Shilubane, Hilda N.
    [J]. STUDIES ON ETHNO-MEDICINE, 2015, 9 (03) : 435 - 441
  • [9] "Magnet4Europe" An Implementation Approach to meet the Challenges in Healthcare
    Schlueer, Anna-Barbara
    [J]. PFLEGE, 2023, 36 (02): : 125 - 125
  • [10] An approach to the implementation of the dynamical priorities method
    Sokolov, VA
    Timofeev, EA
    [J]. PARALLEL COMPUTING TECHNOLOGIES, 2005, 3606 : 74 - 78