Suspended sediment load prediction of river systems: An artificial neural network approach

被引:213
|
作者
Melesse, A. M. [1 ]
Ahmad, S. [2 ]
McClain, M. E. [1 ,5 ]
Wang, X. [3 ]
Lim, Y. H. [4 ]
机构
[1] Florida Int Univ, Dept Earth & Environm, Miami, FL 33199 USA
[2] Univ Nevada, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Las Vegas, NV 89154 USA
[3] Tarleton State Univ, Dept Math Phys & Engn, Stephenville, TX USA
[4] Univ N Dakota, Dept Civil Engn, Grand Forks, ND 58201 USA
[5] UNESCO IHE Inst Water Educ, Delft, Netherlands
关键词
Artificial neural network (ANN); Sediment prediction; Multiple linear regressions (MLR); Multiple non-linear regression (MNLR); Autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA); Mississippi; Missouri; Rio Grande; WATER-QUALITY MANAGEMENT; DECISION-SUPPORT-SYSTEM; FLOW MODELS; RUNOFF; YIELD; PARAMETERS; OPTIMIZATION; HYDROGRAPH; TRANSPORT; ARMA;
D O I
10.1016/j.agwat.2010.12.012
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Information on suspended sediment load is crucial to water management and environmental protection. Suspended sediment loads for three major rivers (Mississippi, Missouri and Rio Grande) in USA are estimated using artificial neural network (ANN) modeling approach. A multilayer perceptron (MLP)ANN with an error back propagation algorithm, using historical daily and weekly hydroclimatological data (precipitation P-(t), current discharge Q((t)), antecedent discharge Q((t-1)), and antecedent sediment load SL(t-1)), is used to predict the suspended sediment load SL(t) at the selected monitoring stations. Performance of ANN was evaluated using different combinations of input data sets, length of record for training, and temporal resolution (daily and weekly data). Results from ANN model were compared with results from multiple linear regressions (MLR), multiple non-linear regression (MNLR) and Autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) using correlation coefficient (R), mean absolute percent error (MAPE) and model efficiency (E). Comparison of training period length was also made (4, 3 and 2 years of training and 1, 2 and 3 years of testing, respectively). The model efficiency (E) and R-2 values were slightly higher for the 4 years of training and 1 year of testing (4 * 1) for Mississippi River, indifferent for Missouri and slightly lower for Rio Grande River. Daily simulations using Input 1 (P-(t), Q((t)), Q((t-1)), SL(t-1)) and three years of training and two years of testing (3 * 2) performed better (R-2 and E of 0.85 and 0.72, respectively) than the simulation with two years of training and three years of testing (2 * 3) (R-2 and E of 0.64 and 0.46, respectively). ANN predicted daily values using Input 1 and 3 * 2 architecture for Missouri (R-2 = 0.97) and Mississippi (R-2 = 0.96) were better than those of Rio Grande (R-2 = 0.65). Daily predictions were better compared to weekly predictions for all three rivers due to higher correlation within daily than weekly data. ANN predictions for most simulations were superior compared to predictions using MLR, MNLR and ARIMA. The modeling approach presented in this paper can be potentially used to reduce the frequency of costly operations for sediment measurement where hydrological data is readily available. (c) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:855 / 866
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Application of Artificial Neural Network Model for the Prediction of Suspended Sediment Load in the Large River
    Gaur, Shishir
    Mishra, Aryan
    Gupta, Anurag
    Jain, Arihant
    Dave, Apurve
    Eslamian, Saied
    Dwivedi, S. B.
    Graillot, Didier
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES, 2021, 48 (04) : 565 - 575
  • [2] Application of Artificial Neural Network Model for the Prediction of Suspended Sediment Load in the Large River
    Shishir Gaur
    Aryan Mishra
    Anurag Gupta
    Arihant Jain
    Apurve Dave
    Saied Eslamian
    S. B. Dwivedi
    Didier Graillot
    [J]. Water Resources, 2021, 48 : 565 - 575
  • [3] Suspended sediment load prediction of river systems: GEP approach
    Azamathulla, H. Md.
    Cuan, Yong Chong
    Ab Ghani, Aminuddin
    Chang, Chun Kiat
    [J]. ARABIAN JOURNAL OF GEOSCIENCES, 2013, 6 (09) : 3469 - 3480
  • [4] Suspended sediment load prediction of river systems: GEP approach
    H. Md. Azamathulla
    Yong Chong Cuan
    Aminuddin Ab. Ghani
    Chun Kiat Chang
    [J]. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2013, 6 : 3469 - 3480
  • [5] A Comparative Analysis of Artificial Neural Network and Support Vector Regression for River Suspended Sediment Load Prediction
    Hazarika, Barenya Bikash
    Gupta, Deepak
    Ashu
    Berlin, Mohanadhas
    [J]. FIRST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SUSTAINABLE TECHNOLOGIES FOR COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE, 2020, 1045 : 339 - 349
  • [6] ESTIMATION OF SUSPENDED SEDIMENT LOAD BY ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK
    Kumcu, S. Y.
    Tumer, A. E.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ECOSYSTEMS AND ECOLOGY SCIENCE-IJEES, 2019, 9 (04): : 665 - 670
  • [7] Suspended sediment load prediction in river systems via shuffled frog-leaping algorithm and neural network
    Katipoglu, Okan Mert
    Akturk, Gaye
    Kilinc, Huseyin cagan
    Terzioglu, Zeynep ozge
    Keblouti, Mehdi
    [J]. EARTH SCIENCE INFORMATICS, 2024, 17 (04) : 3623 - 3649
  • [8] Suspended sediment load prediction using artificial neural network and ant lion optimization algorithm
    Banadkooki, Fatemeh Barzegari
    Ehteram, Mohammad
    Ahmed, Ali Najah
    Teo, Fang Yenn
    Ebrahimi, Mahboube
    Fai, Chow Ming
    Huang, Yuk Feng
    El-Shafie, Ahmed
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2020, 27 (30) : 38094 - 38116
  • [9] Suspended sediment load prediction using artificial neural network and ant lion optimization algorithm
    Fatemeh Barzegari Banadkooki
    Mohammad Ehteram
    Ali Najah Ahmed
    Fang Yenn Teo
    Mahboube Ebrahimi
    Chow Ming Fai
    Yuk Feng Huang
    Ahmed El-Shafie
    [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2020, 27 : 38094 - 38116
  • [10] Correction to: Suspended sediment load prediction using artificial neural network and ant lion optimization algorithm
    Fatemeh Barzegari Banadkooki
    Mohammad Ehteram
    Ali Najah Ahmed
    Fang Yenn Teo
    Mahboube Ebrahimi
    Chow Ming Fai
    Yuk Feng Huang
    Ahmed El-Shafie
    [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2020, 27 : 38117 - 38119