Transient Distraction and Attentional Control during a Sustained Selective Attention Task

被引:8
|
作者
Demeter, Elise [1 ]
Woldorff, Marty G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Durham, NC 27708 USA
关键词
OPEN-SOURCE TOOLBOX; INVOLUNTARY ATTENTION; TEMPORAL DYNAMICS; FRONTAL-CORTEX; VISUAL ONSETS; CAPTURE; SUPPRESSION; PERFORMANCE; CONTINGENT; MECHANISMS;
D O I
10.1162/jocn_a_00949
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Distracting stimuli in the environment can pull our attention away from our goal-directed tasks. fMRI studies have implicated regions in right frontal cortex as being particularly important for processing distractors [e.g., de Fockert, J. W., & Theeuwes, J. Role of frontal cortex in attentional capture by singleton distractors. Brain and Cognition, 80, 367-373, 2012; Demeter, E., Hernandez-Garcia, L., Sarter, M., & Lustig, C. Challenges to attention: A continuous arterial spin labeling (ASL) study of the effects of distraction on sustained attention. Neuroimage, 54, 1518-1529, 2011]. Less is known, however, about the timing and sequence of how right frontal or other brain regions respond selectively to distractors and how distractors impinge upon the cascade of processes related to detecting and processing behaviorally relevant target stimuli. Here we used EEG and ERPs to investigate the neural consequences of a perceptually salient but task-irrelevant distractor on the detection of rare target stimuli embedded in a rapid, serial visual presentation (RSVP) stream. We found that distractors that occur during the presentation of a target interfere behaviorally with detection of those targets, reflected by reduced detection rates, and that these missed targets show a reduced amplitude of the long-latency, detection-related P3 component. We also found that distractors elicited a right-lateralized frontal negativity beginning at 100 msec, whose amplitude negatively correlated across participants with their distraction-related behavioral impairment. Finally, we also quantified the instantaneous amplitude of the steady-state visual evoked potentials elicited by the RSVP stream and found that the occurrence of a distractor resulted in a transient amplitude decrement of the steady-state visual evoked potential, presumably reflecting the pull of attention away from the RSVP stream when distracting stimuli occur in the environment.
引用
收藏
页码:935 / 947
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Coexistence of thought types as an attentional state during a sustained attention task
    Kazushi Shinagawa
    Yu Itagaki
    Satoshi Umeda
    Scientific Reports, 13
  • [2] Coexistence of thought types as an attentional state during a sustained attention task
    Shinagawa, Kazushi
    Itagaki, Yu
    Umeda, Satoshi
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [3] Subjective experience and the attentional lapse: Task engagement and disengagement during sustained attention
    Smallwood, J
    Davies, JB
    Heim, D
    Finnigan, F
    Sudberry, M
    O'Connor, R
    Obonsawin, M
    CONSCIOUSNESS AND COGNITION, 2004, 13 (04) : 657 - 690
  • [4] Encoding during the attentional lapse: Accuracy of encoding during the semantic sustained attention to response task
    Smallwood, J
    Riby, L
    Heim, D
    Davies, JB
    CONSCIOUSNESS AND COGNITION, 2006, 15 (01) : 218 - 231
  • [5] Sustained and transient attention in the Continuous Performance Task
    Smid, HGOM
    de Witte, MR
    Homminga, I
    van den Bosch, RJ
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 28 (06) : 859 - 883
  • [6] Anxiety, Emotional Distraction, and Attentional Control in the Stroop Task
    Kalanthroff, Eyal
    Henik, Avishai
    Derakshan, Nazanin
    Usher, Marius
    EMOTION, 2016, 16 (03) : 293 - 300
  • [7] ASSESSMENT OF SUSTAINED ATTENTION AND DISTRACTION IN CHILDREN USING A CLASSROOM ANALOG TASK
    PRINZ, RJ
    TARNOWSKI, KJ
    NAY, SM
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 1984, 13 (03): : 250 - 256
  • [8] Neural mechanisms of transient and sustained cognitive control during task switching
    Braver, TS
    Reynolds, JR
    Donaldson, DI
    NEURON, 2003, 39 (04) : 713 - 726
  • [9] Delay of selective attention during the attentional blink
    Vul, Edward
    Hanus, Deborah
    Kanwisher, Nancy
    VISION RESEARCH, 2008, 48 (18) : 1902 - 1909
  • [10] Pain and attention: Attentional disruption or distraction?
    Veldhuijzen, DS
    Kenemans, JL
    de Bruin, CM
    Olivier, B
    Volkerts, ER
    JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2006, 7 (01): : 11 - 20