International survey of neurosurgical anesthesia (iSonata) An international survey of current practices in neurosurgical anesthesia

被引:0
|
作者
Loeser, B. [1 ]
Lattau, T. [1 ]
Sies, V [1 ]
Ariza, O. Recio [2 ]
Reuter, D. A. [1 ]
Schloemerkemper, N. [3 ]
Petzoldt, M. [2 ]
Haas, S. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Rostock, Ctr Anesthesiol & Intens Care Med, Dept Anesthesiol, Rostock, Germany
[2] Univ Med Ctr Hamburg Eppendorf, Ctr Anesthesiol & Intens Care Med, Dept Anesthesiol, Hamburg, Germany
[3] UC Davis Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Med, Sacramento, CA USA
来源
ANAESTHESIST | 2020年 / 69卷 / 03期
关键词
Central venous catheter; Craniotomy; Guidelines; Hypothermia; Neurosurgery; INTRAOPERATIVE HYPOTHERMIA; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1007/s00101-019-00727-z
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background No standardized recommendations have been currently defined for anesthesia management of patients undergoing elective intracranial surgery. It can therefore be assumed that international clinical institutions have diverging approaches or standard operating procedures (SOP) which determine the type of general anesthesia, hemodynamic management, neuromuscular blockade, implementation of hypothermia and postoperative patient care. Objective This international survey aimed to assess perioperative patient management during elective intracranial procedures. This survey was performed from February to October 2018 and 311 neurosurgical, maximum care centers across 19 European countries were contacted. The aim was to evaluate the anesthesia management to provide relevant data of neuroanesthesia practices across European centers. The survey differentiated between vascular and non-vascular as well as supratentorial and infratentorial procedures. Results A total of 109 (35.0%) completed questionnaires from 15 European countries were analyzed. The results illustrated that total intravenous anesthesia was most commonly implemented during elective intracranial procedures (83.8%). All centers performed endotracheal intubation prior to major intracranial surgery (100%). Central venous lines were placed in 63.3% of cases. Moderate intraoperative hypothermia was carried out in 12.8% of the procedures, especially during vascular supratentorial and infratentorial surgery. A neuromuscular blockade during surgery was implemented in 74.1% of patients. Assessment of the neuromuscular junction was performed in 59.2% of cases, 76.7% of patients were immediately extubated in the operating room. 84.7% of these patients were directly transferred to a monitoring ward or an intensive care unit (ICU) and 55.1% of ventilated patients were transferred directly to an ICU. Conclusion The data demonstrate that many aspects of anesthesia management during elective intracranial surgery vary between European institutions. The data also suggest that a broad consensus exists regarding the implementation of total intravenous anesthesia, airway management (endotracheal intubation), the implementation of urinary catheters, large bore peripheral venous lines and the broad availability of cross-matched red blood cell concentrates. Nevertheless, anesthesia management (e.g. central venous catheterization, moderate hypothermia, neuromuscular monitoring) is still handled differently across many European institutions. A lack of standardized guidelines defining anesthetic management in patients undergoing intracranial procedures could explain this variability. Further studies could help establish optimal anesthesia management for these patients. This in turn could help in the development of national and international guidelines and SOPs which could define optimal management strategies for intracranial procedures.
引用
收藏
页码:183 / 191
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] International survey of neurosurgical anesthesia (iSonata): An international survey of current practices in neurosurgical anesthesia; [Internationale Umfrage zum anästhesiologischen Management in der Neurochirurgie (iSonata): Eine internationale Erhebung zu aktuellen anästhesiologischen Verfahren in der Neurochirurgie]
    Löser B.
    Lattau T.
    Sies V.
    Recio Ariza O.
    Reuter D.A.
    Schlömerkemper N.
    Petzoldt M.
    Haas S.A.
    [J]. Der Anaesthesist, 2020, 69 (3) : 183 - 191
  • [2] Immunization and anesthesia - an international survey
    Short, JA
    van der Walt, JH
    Zoanetti, DC
    [J]. PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2006, 16 (05) : 514 - 522
  • [3] THE SITTING POSITION IN NEUROSURGICAL ANESTHESIA - A SURVEY OF BRITISH PRACTICE IN 1991
    ELTON, RJ
    HOWELL, RSC
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1994, 73 (02) : 247 - 248
  • [4] NEUROSURGICAL ANESTHESIA
    SHAPIRO, HM
    AIDINIS, SJ
    [J]. SURGICAL CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1975, 55 (04) : 913 - 928
  • [5] NEUROSURGICAL ANESTHESIA
    BETHLEHEM, BHJ
    [J]. SOUTH AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1977, 51 (17): : 567 - 567
  • [6] NEUROSURGICAL ANESTHESIA
    MCDOWALL, DG
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1976, 48 (08) : 717 - 717
  • [7] NEUROSURGICAL ANESTHESIA
    TRAILL, R
    [J]. BAILLIERES CLINICAL ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 1993, 7 (02): : 399 - 422
  • [8] PROPOFOL IN NEUROSURGICAL ANESTHESIA
    RAVUSSIN, P
    STREBEL, S
    [J]. ANAESTHESIST, 1995, 44 (06): : 405 - 409
  • [9] ANESTHESIA FOR NEUROSURGICAL PROCEDURES
    OSBORN, JE
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1954, 156 (06): : 589 - 591
  • [10] ALTHESIN IN NEUROSURGICAL ANESTHESIA
    HENDERSON, JJ
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1981, 53 (03) : P312 - P312