Intensive care unit dignified care: Development and validation of a questionnaire

被引:3
|
作者
Liang, Andong [1 ]
Xu, Wenxian [1 ]
Shen, Yucong [1 ]
Yang, Yeqin [1 ]
Hu, Qiongshuang [2 ]
Xu, Zhenzhen [3 ]
Pan, Peipei [4 ]
Lu, Zhongqiu [5 ]
机构
[1] Wenzhou Med Univ, Sch Nursing, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Wenzhou Med Univ, Dept Neurosurg, Affiliated Hosp 1, Wenzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Wenzhou Med Univ, Dept Gynecol, Affiliated Hosp 1, Wenzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Wenzhou Med Univ, Dept Cardiovasc Med, Affiliated Hosp 1, Wenzhou, Peoples R China
[5] Wenzhou Med Univ, Emergency Dept, Affiliated Hosp 1, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
关键词
Dignity; patient care; nursing; intensive care unit; instrument development; reliability; validity; DIGNITY; RESPECT; INDEX; ELEMENTS; PATIENT; DEATH;
D O I
10.1177/09697330221096777
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Patient dignity is sometimes neglected in intensive care unit (ICU) settings, which may potentially cause psychological harm to critically ill patients. However, no instrument has been specifically developed to evaluate the behaviors of dignified care among critical care nurses. Aim This study aimed to develop and evaluate ICU Dignified Care Questionnaire (IDCQ) for measurement of self-assessed dignity-conserving behaviors of critical care nurses during care. Methods The instrument was developed in 3 phases. Phase 1: item generation; phase 2: a two-round Delphi survey and a readability pilot study; phase 3: cross-sectional survey with model estimation. The questionnaire was evaluated by item analysis, exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, assessment of internal consistency reliability, and test-retest reliability. The investigation was conducted using a convenience sample of 392 critical care nurses from 6 cities in Zhejiang Province, China, of which 30 participated in the test-retest reliability survey 2 weeks later. Ethical considerations The study was approved by ethics committee. All participants provided written informed consent before the survey. The questionnaire survey was anonymous. Results The results showed acceptable reliability and validity of the IDCQ. The 17-item final version questionnaire was divided into 2 dimensions: absolute dignity and relative dignity. These two factors accounted for 62.804% of the total variance, and model fitting results were acceptable. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the questionnaire was 0.94, and the test-retest intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.88 after 2 weeks. Conclusions This study developed a brief and reliable instrument (IDCQ) to assess dignified care in ICU nursing. It can help critical care nurses identify their behaviors in maintaining patient dignity and discover their deficiencies. It may also serve as a clinical nursing management tool to help reduce patient disrespect experience in ICU.
引用
收藏
页码:1683 / 1696
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Internsive Care Treatment Dignified Death in the Intensive Care Unit
    Rimkus, Carolin
    [J]. ZENTRALBLATT FUR CHIRURGIE, 2014, 139 (05): : 474 - 474
  • [2] Intensive care unit dignified care: Persian translation and psychometric evaluation
    Jalali, Amir
    Darvishi, Niloufar
    Kalhory, Parnia
    Merati, Fateme
    Vatandost, Salam
    Moradi, Khalil
    [J]. NURSING OPEN, 2024, 11 (07):
  • [3] ORCHESTRATING A DIGNIFIED DEATH IN THE INTENSIVE-CARE UNIT
    YOUNGNER, SJ
    [J]. CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 1990, 36 (8B) : 1617 - 1622
  • [4] Families' experiences of intensive care unit quality of care: Development and validation of a European questionnaire (euroQ2)
    Jensen, Hanne Irene
    Gerritsen, Rik T.
    Koopmans, Matty
    Zijlstra, Jan G.
    Curtis, Jared Randall
    Ording, Helle
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2015, 30 (05) : 884 - 890
  • [5] The intensive care unit psychosocial care scale: Development and initial validation
    Hariharan, Meena
    Chivukula, Usha
    Rana, Suvashisa
    [J]. INTENSIVE AND CRITICAL CARE NURSING, 2015, 31 (06) : 343 - 351
  • [6] Validation of "the patient evaluation of emotional care during hospitalisation" questionnaire in intensive care unit patients
    Fernandez Trujillo, Alejandra
    Vallverdu Cartie, Helena
    Roman Maestre, Begona
    Lema Vazquez, Jorge
    Berrade Zubiri, Julian
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (11):
  • [7] Development and validation of an eye care educational programme for intensive care unit nurses
    Cho, Ok-Hee
    Yoo, Yang-Sook
    Yun, Sun-Hee
    Hwang, Kyung-Hye
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2017, 26 (13-14) : 2073 - 2082
  • [8] Measuring family satisfaction with care in the intensive care unit: The development of a questionnaire and preliminary results
    Heyland, DK
    Tranmer, JE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2001, 16 (04) : 142 - 149
  • [9] Dignified death in the Intensive Care Unit: How has it been conducted?
    Ivankovics, Ivan Gregorio
    Vieira, Gislaine dos Santos Rodrigues
    Faleiro, Lucas Freitas
    Vieira, Thiago Felipe de Moraes
    Romanini, Wdmila Gabriela Borges
    do Nascimento, Weylla Silva
    Madueno Jr, Carlos Rafael Hurtado
    Falqueti, Airton Batista
    Nunes, Rui
    [J]. ACTA BIOETHICA, 2023, 29 (02) : 213 - 217
  • [10] DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF A MOUSE MODEL OF INTENSIVE CARE UNIT DELIRIUM
    Illendula, Meghana
    Ferrarese, Bianca
    Zuo, Zhiyi
    Lunardi, Nadia
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2020, 48