Modifications in the glycerophospholipid composition between the Coxiella burnetii phase I and phase II cells suggest an association with phase variation of the bacterium

被引:3
|
作者
Frimmelova, M. [1 ]
Toman, R. [1 ]
Pompach, P. [2 ,3 ]
Skultety, L. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Slovak Acad Sci, Biomed Res Ctr, Inst Virol, Dubravska Cesta 9, Bratislava 84505, Slovakia
[2] ASCR, Vvi, Inst Microbiol, Videnska 1083, Prague 14220 4, Czech Republic
[3] Charles Univ Prague, Fac Sci, Dept Biochem, Prague, Czech Republic
关键词
Coxiella burnetii; glycerophospholipids; FT-ICR MS; Q-FEVER; STAPHYLOCOCCUS-AUREUS; LIPOPOLYSACCHARIDE; PHOSPHOLIPIDS; LIPIDS;
D O I
10.4149/av_2016_01_27
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Glycerophospholipids (GP) extracted from the Coxiella burnetii strain Nine Mile in virulent phase I (NM I) and low virulent phase II (NM II) were analyzed by Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance (FT-ICR) mass spectrometry (MS) that gave a superior mass resolution and mass accuracy allowing unambiguous peak recognition and precise assignment of ions. We showed that GP present in the pathogen's outer membrane underwent considerable modifications during the phase variation that might be related to impact of various environmental factors. It was found that GP from phase I cells were much more complex than those from phase II cells. While glycerophosphoethanolamines (PE), glycerophosphocholines (PC) and glycerophosphoglycerols (PG) were present in both phases of C. burnetii, major differences were observed in the presence of glycerophosphates (PA) and glycerophosphoserines (PS). Thus, PA but no PS were detected in NM I variant in contrast with NM II cells where PS but no PA were identified. It is suggested that enzymes for PA head group modifications to form PS, PE, and PG become active during the phase variation of the bacterium.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 33
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] PHASE VARIATION IN COXIELLA BURNETII
    BREZINA, R
    FOLIA MICROBIOLOGICA, 1976, 21 (06) : 502 - 502
  • [2] Immunological consequences of Coxiella burnetii phase variation
    Diaz, MAQ
    Lukácová, M
    ACTA VIROLOGICA, 1998, 42 (03) : 181 - 185
  • [3] Effect of vaccination with phase I and phase II Coxiella burnetii vaccines in pregnant goats
    Arricau-Bouvery, N
    Souriau, A
    Bodier, C
    Dufour, P
    Rousset, E
    Rodolakis, A
    VACCINE, 2005, 23 (35) : 4392 - 4402
  • [4] A growth study of Coxiella burnetii Nine Mile Phase I and Phase II in Fibroblasts
    Miller, JD
    Curns, AT
    Thompson, HA
    FEMS IMMUNOLOGY AND MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2004, 42 (03): : 291 - 297
  • [5] PHASE VARIATION OF COXIELLA BURNETII (THEORY AND PRACTICE)
    PAUTOV, VN
    ZHURNAL MIKROBIOLOGII EPIDEMIOLOGII I IMMUNOBIOLOGII, 1989, (09): : 97 - 103
  • [6] Evolutive cycle and phase variation of Coxiella burnetii
    Pascual Velasco, Francisco
    MEDICINA CLINICA, 2007, 129 (15): : 597 - 598
  • [7] Comparative virulence of phase I and II Coxiella burnetii in immunodeficient mice
    Andoh, Masako
    Russell-Lodrigue, Kasi E.
    Zhang, Guoquan
    Samuel, James E.
    RICKETTSIOSES: FROM GENOME TO PROTEOME, PATHOBIOLOGY, AND RICKETTSIAE AS AN INTERNATIONAL THREAT, 2005, 1063 : 167 - 170
  • [8] Genetic mechanisms of Coxiella burnetii lipopolysaccharide phase variation
    Beare, Paul A.
    Jeffrey, Brendan M.
    Long, Carrie M.
    Martens, Craig M.
    Heinzen, Robert A.
    PLOS PATHOGENS, 2018, 14 (02)
  • [10] GENOMIC ANALYSIS OF PHASE-I AND PHASE-II COXIELLA-BURNETII WITH RESTRICTION ENDONUCLEASES
    OROURKE, AT
    PEACOCK, M
    SAMUEL, JE
    FRAZIER, ME
    NATVIG, DO
    MALLAVIA, LP
    BACA, O
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1985, 131 (JUN): : 1543 - 1546