Ventricular Assist Device in Acute Myocardial Infarction

被引:31
|
作者
Acharya, Deepak [1 ]
Loyaga-Rendon, Renzo Y. [1 ]
Pamboukian, Salpy V. [1 ]
Tallaj, Jose A. [1 ]
Holman, William L. [2 ]
Cantor, Ryan S. [2 ,3 ]
Naftel, David C. [2 ]
Kirklin, James K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Sect Adv Heart Failure Transplant & Mech Circulat, 1900 Univ Blvd,THT 321, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[2] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Div Cardiovasc Surg, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[3] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
cardiogenic shock; heart assist devices; left ventricular assist device; low cardiac output; MECHANICAL CIRCULATORY SUPPORT; CARDIOGENIC-SHOCK; HEART-FAILURE; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jacc.2016.02.025
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated by acute heart failure or cardiogenic shock have high mortality with conventional management. OBJECTIVES This study evaluated outcomes of patients with AMI who received durable ventricular assist devices (VAD). METHODS Patients in the INTERMACS (Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support) registry who underwent VAD placement in the setting of AMI were included and compared with patients who received VAD for non-AMI indications. RESULTS VAD were implanted in 502 patients with AMI: 443 left ventricular assist devices; 33 biventricular assist devices; and 26 total artificial hearts. Median age was 58.3 years, and 77.1% were male. At implantation, 66% were INTERMACS profile 1. A higher proportion of AMI than non-AMI patients had pre-operative intra-aortic balloon pumps (57.6% vs. 25.3%; p < 0.01), intubation (58% vs. 8.3%; p < 0.01), extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (17.9% vs. 1.7%, p < 0.01), cardiac arrest (33.5% vs. 3.3%, p < 0.01), and higher-acuity INTERMACS profiles. At 1 month post-VAD, 91.8% of AMI patients were alive with ongoing device support, 7.2% had died on device, and 1% had been transplanted. At 1-year post-VAD, 52% of AMI patients were alive with ongoing device support, 25.7% had been transplanted, 1.6% had left VAD explanted for recovery, and 20.7% had died on device. The AMI group had higher unadjusted early phase hazard (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.24; p = 0.04) and reduced late-phase hazard of death (HR: 0.57; p = 0.04) than the non-AMI group did. After accounting for established risk factors, the AMI group no longer had higher early mortality hazard (HR: 0.89; p = 0.30), but it had lower late mortality hazard (HR: 0.55; p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS Patients with AMI who receive VAD have outcomes similar to other VAD populations, despite being more critically ill pre-implantation. VAD therapy is an effective strategy for patients with AMI and acute heart failure or shock in whom medical therapy is failing. (C) 2016 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
引用
收藏
页码:1871 / 1880
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Left ventricular assist device bridge therapy for acute myocardial infarction
    Park, SJ
    Nguyen, DQ
    Bank, AJ
    Ormaza, S
    Bolman, RM
    [J]. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2000, 69 (04): : 1146 - 1151
  • [2] Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction in a Patient With a Left Ventricular Assist Device
    Friede, Kevin A.
    Blumer, Vanessa
    Tcheng, James
    Jones, William
    Patel, Manesh R.
    Agarwal, Richa
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2020, 142
  • [3] Ventricular Assist Device in Acute Myocardial Infarction-Findings From INTERMACS
    Acharya, D.
    Loyaga-Rendon, R. Y.
    Tallaj, J. A.
    Pamboukian, S. V.
    Holman, W. L.
    George, J. F.
    Cantor, R. S.
    Naftel, D. C.
    Kirklin, J. K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2015, 34 (04): : S28 - S29
  • [4] Role of left ventricular assist device for patients in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock
    Park, S
    Colvin-Adams, M
    Ormaza, S
    Liao, K
    Segurola, R
    Boyle, A
    Miller, LW
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2003, 108 (17) : 365 - 365
  • [5] A Case Series of Acute Myocardial Infarction in Left Ventricular Assist Device-Supported Patients
    Godishala, Anuradha
    Nassif, Michael E.
    Raymer, David S.
    Hartupee, Justin
    Ewald, Gregory A.
    Larue, Shane J.
    Vader, Justin M.
    [J]. ASAIO JOURNAL, 2017, 63 (02) : E18 - E24
  • [6] Extracorporeal Left Ventricular Assist Device as a Bridge to Surgery for Ventricular Septal Rupture After Acute Myocardial Infarction
    Tong, Lu
    Wu, Long
    Dong, Nianguo
    [J]. PATIENT PREFERENCE AND ADHERENCE, 2023, 17 : 2871 - 2876
  • [7] Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Females with Acute Myocardial Infarction
    Voudris, Konstantinos
    Vidovich, Mladen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 70 (18) : B66 - B67
  • [8] Temporary surgical ventricular assist device for treatment of acute myocardial infarction and refractory cardiogenic shock in the percutaneous device era
    Singh, Sameer K.
    Witer, Lucas
    Kaku, Yuji
    Masoumi, Amirali
    Fried, Justin A.
    Yuzefpolskaya, Melana
    Colombo, Paolo C.
    Sayer, Gabriel
    Uriel, Nir
    Naka, Yoshifumi
    Takayama, Hiroo
    Takeda, Koji
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL ORGANS, 2021, 24 (02) : 199 - 206
  • [9] Temporary surgical ventricular assist device for treatment of acute myocardial infarction and refractory cardiogenic shock in the percutaneous device era
    Sameer K. Singh
    Lucas Witer
    Yuji Kaku
    Amirali Masoumi
    Justin A. Fried
    Melana Yuzefpolskaya
    Paolo C. Colombo
    Gabriel Sayer
    Nir Uriel
    Yoshifumi Naka
    Hiroo Takayama
    Koji Takeda
    [J]. Journal of Artificial Organs, 2021, 24 : 199 - 206
  • [10] The use of an implantable left ventricular assist device in a patient with cardiogenic shock following acute myocardial infarction
    Chua, TP
    Pepper, JR
    Fox, KM
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1998, 66 (01) : 55 - 58