A Comparative Study of Machine Learning Approaches for Recommending University Faculty

被引:0
|
作者
Kamal, Nabila [1 ]
Sarker, Farhana [2 ]
Mamun, Khondaker A. [1 ]
机构
[1] United Int Univ, Adv Intelligent Multidisciplinary Syst Lab, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Dhaka, Bangladesh
[2] Univ Liberal Arts Bangladesh ULAB, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Dhaka, Bangladesh
关键词
Big5; 16PF; Personality; Group differences; Classification; Random Forest; MLP; PERSONALITY;
D O I
10.1109/STI50764.2020.9350461
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Academic program selection is a vital decision as it plays a substantial role in enhancing opportunities in career paths. Numerous researches utilizing psychometrics have been conducted in recent years, and result reveals an evident association between academic fields and personality traits of students. To assist students in making an informed academic decision, this study analyzes the differences amongst the students of nine study programs in Bangladesh and envisages the appropriate academic choice among these nine fields for the prospective students by analyzing their academic grades, personality traits, and intelligence. For the experiment, we have collected data from 103 participants and used students' academic grades, Big-5 personality traits, and Factor B (Reasoning) of 16PF to develop classification models by utilizing two classification approaches. Results show that the Hierarchical classification approach using Random Forest Classifier outperformed the One-level Random Forest classifier approach by obtaining 96.1% accuracy for the 1st-level and 92.86%, 89.29%, and 94.74% respectively for 2nd-level. The findings of this study demonstrate that the proposed framework has great potential in assisting prospective students to make an informed decision to determine the suitable higher study options while unlocking human potential.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparative Study of Machine Learning Approaches in Diabetes Prediction
    Parameswari, P.
    Rajathi, N.
    [J]. BIOSCIENCE BIOTECHNOLOGY RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2020, 13 (11): : 42 - 46
  • [2] A Comparative Study of Machine Learning Approaches for Handwriter Identification
    Durou, Amal
    Aref, Ibrahim
    Elbendak, Mosa
    Al-Maadeed, Somaya
    Bouridane, Ahmed
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF 2019 IEEE 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GLOBAL SECURITY, SAFETY AND SUSTAINABILITY (ICGS3-2019), 2019, : 207 - 212
  • [3] A comparative study of Sentiment Analysis Machine Learning Approaches
    Maada, Loukmane
    Al Fararni, Khalid
    Aghoutane, Badraddine
    Fattah, Mohammed
    Farhaoui, Yousef
    [J]. 2022 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INNOVATIVE RESEARCH IN APPLIED SCIENCE, ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY (IRASET'2022), 2022, : 526 - 530
  • [4] A Comparative Study on Machine Learning Approaches to Thunderstorm Gale Identification
    Li, Haifeng
    Li, Yan
    Li, Xutao
    Ye, Yunming
    Li, Xian
    Xie, Pengfei
    [J]. ICMLC 2019: 2019 11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING AND COMPUTING, 2019, : 6 - 10
  • [5] Authorship attribution in twitter: a comparative study of machine learning and deep learning approaches
    Rebeh Imane Ammar Aouchiche
    Fatima Boumahdi
    Mohamed Abdelkarim Remmide
    Amina Madani
    [J]. International Journal of Information Technology, 2024, 16 (5) : 3303 - 3310
  • [6] Using Machine Learning for Recommending Service Demand Estimation Approaches - Position Paper
    Grohmann, Johannes
    Herbst, Nikolas
    Spinner, Simon
    Kounev, Samuel
    [J]. CLOSER: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CLOUD COMPUTING AND SERVICES SCIENCE, 2018, : 473 - 480
  • [7] A comparative study of machine learning approaches for modeling concrete failure surfaces
    Reuter, Uwe
    Sultan, Ahmad
    Reischl, Dirk S.
    [J]. ADVANCES IN ENGINEERING SOFTWARE, 2018, 116 : 67 - 79
  • [8] Predictive modeling in urgent care: a comparative study of machine learning approaches
    Tang, Fengyi
    Xiao, Cao
    Wang, Fei
    Zhou, Jiayu
    [J]. JAMIA OPEN, 2018, 1 (01) : 87 - 98
  • [9] Comparative Study between Traditional Machine Learning and Deep Learning Approaches for Text Classification
    Kamath, Cannannore Nidhi
    Bukhari, Syed Saqib
    Dengel, Andreas
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACM SYMPOSIUM ON DOCUMENT ENGINEERING (DOCENG 2018), 2018,
  • [10] Which Study Strategies Are Nursing Faculty Recommending?
    Michael, Robert Kelly
    Martin, Kristopher
    [J]. NURSING EDUCATION PERSPECTIVES, 2019, 40 (04) : 244 - 246