Perioperative antibiotics should be used for placement of implanted central venous ports: A propensity analysis evaluating risk

被引:8
|
作者
Scaife, Courtney L. [1 ]
Mone, Mary C. [1 ]
Bowen, Megan E. [1 ]
Swords, Douglas S. [1 ]
Zhang, Chong [2 ]
Presson, Angela P. [2 ]
Nelson, Edward W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Sch Med, Dept Surg, 30 North 1900 East,3B110, Salt Lake City, UT 84132 USA
[2] Univ Utah, Dept Epidemiol & Internal Med, 295 Chipeta Way, Salt Lake City, UT 84132 USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY | 2018年 / 216卷 / 06期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
CARE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT; SURGICAL SITE INFECTION; PREVENTION; PROPHYLAXIS; GUIDELINES; COMPLICATIONS; INSERTION; SYSTEMS; INITIATIVES; TEICOPLANIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.09.022
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To quantify risk for CRI based on PABX use in CVAP placement for cancer patients. Summary background data: : Central venous access ports (CVAP) are totally implanted devices used for chemotherapy. There is a temporal risk for catheter related infection (CRI) to insertion and perioperative prophylactic antibiotics (PABX) use is a contested issue among practitioners. Methods: Data was collected from a single center, academic oncology center. Treatment with a perioperative PABX was compared to non-treatment, to examine the incidence of 14-day CRI. Propensity scores with matched weights controlled for confounding, using 15 demographic, procedural and clinical variables. Results: From 2007 to 2012, 1,091 CVAP were placed, where 59.7 % received PABX. The 14-day CRI rate was 0.82%, with 78% of those not receiving PABX. While results did not achieve statistical significance, use of PABX was associated with a 58% reduction in the odds of a 14-day CRI (OR = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.08-2.24, p = 0.31). Conclusion: The findings suggest a reduction in early CRI with the use of PABX. Since CRI treatment can range from a course of oral antibiotics, port removal, to hospital admission, we suggest clinicians consider these data when considering PABX in this high-risk population. (C) 2018 Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1135 / 1143
页数:9
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] Unnecessary perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in the placement of totally implanted central venous access ports should be avoided
    Cataldo, Maria Adriana
    Petrosillo, Nicola
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2012, 204 (04): : 555 - 556
  • [2] Antibiotic prophylaxis in the placement of totally implanted central venous access ports
    Scaife, Courtney L.
    Gross, Molly E.
    Mone, Mary C.
    Hansen, Heidi J.
    Litz, Codi L.
    Nelson, Edward T.
    Anderson, Clayton J.
    Wagner, Graham
    Gawlick, Ute
    Nelson, Edward W.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2010, 200 (06): : 719 - 722
  • [3] Antibiotic prophylaxis in the placement of totally implanted central venous access ports Discussion
    Stewart, Ronald
    Gross, Molly
    Sticca, Robert
    Andrassy, Richard
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2010, 200 (06): : 722 - 723
  • [4] A survey of American College of Surgery fellows evaluating their use of antibiotic prophylaxis in the placement of subcutaneously implanted central venous access ports
    Nelson, Edward T.
    Gross, Molly E.
    Mone, Mary C.
    Hansen, Heidi J.
    Nelson, Edward W.
    Scaife, Courtney L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2013, 206 (06): : 1034 - 1039
  • [5] Perioperative neutropenia is not an independent risk factor for infectious complications of central venous line placement in children: A propensity score-matched analysis
    Cunningham, Aaron J.
    McClellan, Kristen V.
    Dewey, Elizabeth
    Krishnaswami, Sanjay
    Butler, Marilyn W.
    Nolt, Dawn
    Fialkowski, Elizabeth
    Haag, Meredith C.
    Hamilton, Nicholas A.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2020, 55 (07) : 1339 - 1343
  • [6] A survey of American College of Surgery fellows evaluating their use of antibiotic prophylaxis in the placement of subcutaneously implanted central venous access ports Discussion
    Dzandu, James
    Nelson, Edward T.
    Corneille, Mike
    Mangram, Alicia
    Allo, Maria
    Harris, Joel
    Smith, Randall
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2013, 206 (06): : 1039 - 1040
  • [7] Risk of thrombosis and infections of central venous catheters and totally implanted access ports in patients treated for cancer
    Beckers, M. M. J.
    Ruven, H. J. T.
    Seldenrijk, C. A.
    Prins, M. H.
    Biesma, D. H.
    THROMBOSIS RESEARCH, 2010, 125 (04) : 318 - 321
  • [8] CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETERS Impregnated central venous catheters should be readily used to reduce risk of bloodstream infection
    Gilbert, Ruth
    Harron, Katie
    Mok, Quen
    Gamble, Carrol
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 347
  • [9] Risk factors for unsuccessful removal of central venous access ports implanted in the forearm of adult oncologic patients
    Mitsuhiro Kinoshita
    Shoichiro Takao
    Junichiro Hiraoka
    Katsuya Takechi
    Yoko Akagawa
    Kyosuke Osaki
    Norio Ohnishi
    Hayato Tani
    Japanese Journal of Radiology, 2022, 40 : 412 - 418
  • [10] Risk factors for unsuccessful removal of central venous access ports implanted in the forearm of adult oncologic patients
    Kinoshita, Mitsuhiro
    Takao, Shoichiro
    Hiraoka, Junichiro
    Takechi, Katsuya
    Akagawa, Yoko
    Osaki, Kyosuke
    Ohnishi, Norio
    Tani, Hayato
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2022, 40 (04) : 412 - 418