Quantile-based topology optimization under uncertainty using Kriging metamodel

被引:9
|
作者
Zhang, Jinhao [1 ]
Xiao, Mi [1 ]
Li, Peigen [1 ]
Gao, Liang [1 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, State Key Lab Digital Mfg Equipment & Technol, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China
关键词
Quantile-based topology optimization; Reliability-based topology optimization; Kriging metamodel; Sequential update; RELIABILITY-BASED DESIGN; PERFORMANCE-MEASURE APPROACH; GEOMETRICALLY NONLINEAR STRUCTURES; CONTINUUM STRUCTURES;
D O I
10.1016/j.cma.2022.114690
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
This paper investigates reliability-based topology optimization (RBTO) and proposes a novel quantile-based topology optimization (QBTO) method. With this method, the traditional RBTO model is transformed into an equivalent quantile-based formulation, which can well avoid the issues existing in RBTO with Monte Carlo simulation (MCS), i.e., stagnation of optimizer due to near zero sensitivities of probabilistic constraint with regard to element densities, huge computational cost on calculating sensitivities, and the discontinuity of failure indicator function. Specially, in QBTO, the sensitivities only require to be calculated at the sample corresponding to the quantile instead of all MCS samples, which can drastically reduce the computational effort. Furthermore, a sequential update strategy of Kriging metamodel is developed to efficiently calculate the quantile by evaluating the true constraint at fewer samples, rather than all MCS samples. The high accuracy and efficiency of QBTO are validated by truss, beam and bridge problems. (C) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Quantile-based optimization under uncertainties using adaptive Kriging surrogate models
    Moustapha, Maliki
    Sudret, Bruno
    Bourinet, Jean-Marc
    Guillaume, Benoit
    [J]. STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2016, 54 (06) : 1403 - 1421
  • [2] Quantile-based optimization under uncertainties using adaptive Kriging surrogate models
    Maliki Moustapha
    Bruno Sudret
    Jean-Marc Bourinet
    Benoît Guillaume
    [J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2016, 54 : 1403 - 1421
  • [3] Quantile-Based Design and Optimization of Shallow Foundation on Cohesionless Soil Using Adaptive Kriging Surrogates
    Nazeeh, K. M.
    Dilip, Deepthi Mary
    Babu, G. L. Sivakumar
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOMECHANICS, 2023, 23 (09)
  • [4] A quantile-based scenario analysis approach to biomass supply chain optimization under uncertainty
    Zamar, David S.
    Gopaluni, Bhushan
    Sokhansanj, Shahab
    Newlands, Nathaniel K.
    [J]. COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2017, 97 : 114 - 123
  • [5] Quantile-based sequential optimization and reliability assessment method under random and interval hybrid uncertainty
    Li, Xinglin
    Lu, Zhenzhou
    Wei, Ning
    [J]. PROBABILISTIC ENGINEERING MECHANICS, 2024, 76
  • [6] A robust optimization using the statistics based on kriging metamodel
    Lee, Kwon-Hee
    Kang, Dong-Heon
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 20 (08) : 1169 - 1182
  • [7] A robust optimization using the statistics based on kriging metamodel
    Kwon-Hee Lee
    Dong-Heon Kang
    [J]. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2006, 20
  • [8] Concurrent topology optimization for cellular structures with nonuniform microstructures based on the kriging metamodel
    Yan Zhang
    Hao Li
    Mi Xiao
    Liang Gao
    Sheng Chu
    Jinhao Zhang
    [J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2019, 59 : 1273 - 1299
  • [9] Concurrent topology optimization for cellular structures with nonuniform microstructures based on the kriging metamodel
    Zhang, Yan
    Li, Hao
    Xiao, Mi
    Gao, Liang
    Chu, Sheng
    Zhang, Jinhao
    [J]. STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2019, 59 (04) : 1273 - 1299
  • [10] An on-line Kriging metamodel assisted robust optimization approach under interval uncertainty
    Zhou, Qi
    Jiang, Ping
    Shao, Xinyu
    Zhou, Hui
    Hu, Jiexiang
    [J]. ENGINEERING COMPUTATIONS, 2017, 34 (02) : 420 - 446