Intranasal Fentanyl Combined with Oral Midazolam for Pediatric Dental Sedation: A Controlled Randomized Blinded Crossover Clinical Trial

被引:0
|
作者
Alhaidari, Roaa, I [1 ]
AlSarheed, Maha [1 ]
Sheta, Saad A. [2 ]
Aldhubaiban, Mohammed [1 ]
机构
[1] King Saud Univ, Coll Dent, Dept Pediat Dent & Orthodont, Div Pediat Dent, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[2] King Saud Univ, Coll Dent, Dept Oral Maxillofacial Surg, Div Anesthesiol, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
关键词
PEDIATRICS; MODERATE SEDATION; MIDAZOLAM; FENTANYL; CHILDREN; GUIDELINES; ANESTHESIA;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of intranasal fentanyl combined with oral midazolam to oral mida-zolam alone in pediatric dental patients. Methods: Thirty-two uncooperative healthy children aged three to six years old, who met the inclusion criteria, were randomly assigned to receive oral midazolam (0.7 mg/kg) with either intranasal fentanyl (one mu g/kg) or intranasal placebo (saline). A controlled, randomized, double-blinded, crossover clinical trial design was followed so that each child received both regimens. Data collected included the onset of sedation, working time, sedation and behavior assessment, and occurrence of side effects. Results: The onset of sedation time was not statistically different between the two groups (P=0.62), while the median working time of the midazolam/fentanyl sedation was sig-nificantly longer than the midazolam sedation (P<0.001). Sedation scores were significantly better with the midazolam/fentanyl sedation regimen at separation from parents (P=0.032), local anesthesia administration (P=0.018), rubber dam application (P=0.035), after five minutes of dental treatment (P=0.035), after 10 minutes (P=0.039), after 15 minutes (P=0.012), and after 20 minutes (P=0.038). Behavior scores were significantly better with the midazolam/fentanyl sedation only at local anesthesia administration (P=0.021), rubber dam placement (P=0.004), and after five minutes of dental treatment (P=0.049). Minor side effects occurred in 12.5 percent of sedation procedures and were not significantly associated with either of the two groups (P=0.70). Conclusion: The combination of oral midazolam with intranasal fentanyl sedation, when compared to oral midazolamas a single agent, significantly improved sedation and behavior during local anesthesia and operative dentistry for healthy three -to six-year-old children in addition to prolonged sedation working time.
引用
收藏
页码:255 / 260
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Oral midazolam vs. intranasal dexmedetomidine plus oral midazolam for sedation of pediatric outpatients: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial
    Nie, Juan
    Chen, Chanchan
    Xie, Jing
    Ding, Guicong
    [J]. BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [2] Oral midazolam vs. intranasal dexmedetomidine plus oral midazolam for sedation of pediatric outpatients: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial
    Juan Nie
    Chanchan Chen
    Jing Xie
    Guicong Ding
    [J]. BMC Anesthesiology, 23
  • [3] Randomized clinical trial on the efficacy of intranasal or oral ketamine-midazolam combinations compared to oral midazolam for outpatient pediatric sedation
    Sado-Filho, Joji
    Viana, Karolline Alves
    Correa-Faria, Patricia
    Costa, Luciane Rezende
    Costa, Paulo Sucasas
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (03):
  • [4] Intranasal sedation using ketamine and midazolam for pediatric dental treatment (NASO): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Gomes, Heloisa Sousa
    Miranda, Analya Rodrigues
    Viana, Karolline Alves
    Batista, Aline Carvalho
    Costa, Paulo Sucasas
    Daher, Anelise
    Morais Machado, Geovanna de Castro
    Sado-Filho, Joji
    Candido Vieira, Liliani Aires
    Correa-Faria, Patricia
    Hosey, Marie Therese
    Costa, Luciane Rezende
    [J]. TRIALS, 2017, 18
  • [5] Intranasal sedation using ketamine and midazolam for pediatric dental treatment (NASO): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Heloisa Sousa Gomes
    Analya Rodrigues Miranda
    Karolline Alves Viana
    Aline Carvalho Batista
    Paulo Sucasas Costa
    Anelise Daher
    Geovanna de Castro Morais Machado
    Joji Sado-Filho
    Liliani Aires Candido Vieira
    Patrícia Corrêa-Faria
    Marie Therese Hosey
    Luciane Rezende Costa
    [J]. Trials, 18
  • [6] A comparison of intranasal dexmedetomidine and oral midazolam for premedication in pediatric anesthesia: A double-blinded randomized controlled trial
    Yuen, Vivian M.
    Hui, Theresa W.
    Irwin, Michael G.
    Yuen, Man K.
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2008, 106 (06): : 1715 - 1721
  • [7] A randomised, controlled, crossover trial of oral midazolam and nitrous oxide for paediatric dental sedation
    Wilson, KE
    Welbury, RR
    Girdler, NM
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA, 2002, 57 (09) : 860 - 867
  • [8] Comparative evaluation of intranasal midazolam-ketamine, dexmedetomidine-ketamine, midazolam-fentanyl, and dexmedetomidine-fentanyl combinations for procedural sedation and analgesia in pediatric dental patients: a randomized controlled trial
    Agarwal, Abhilasha
    Ansari, Afroz Alam
    Nath, Rajendra
    Chak, Rakesh Kumar
    Singh, Rajeev Kumar
    Khanna, Richa
    Singh, Prem Raj
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2023, 23 (02) : 69 - 81
  • [9] The efficacy and safety of midazolam with fentanyl versus midazolam with ketamine for bedside invasive procedural sedation in pediatric oncology patients: A randomized, double-blinded, crossover trial
    Monsereenusorn, Chalinee
    Malaithong, Wanwipha
    Lertvivatpong, Nawachai
    Photia, Apichat
    Rujkijyanont, Piya
    Traivaree, Chanchai
    [J]. PEDIATRIC HEMATOLOGY AND ONCOLOGY, 2022, 39 (08) : 681 - 696
  • [10] A Comparative Evaluation of Intranasal Midazolam, Ketamine and their Combination for Sedation of Young Uncooperative Pediatric Dental Patients: A Triple Blind Randomized Crossover Trial
    Bahetwar, S. K.
    Pandey, R. K.
    Saksena, A. K.
    Chandra, Girish
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PEDIATRIC DENTISTRY, 2011, 35 (04) : 415 - 420