Reinforcing Communication on the Internet of Aerial Vehicles

被引:20
|
作者
Abul Hassan, Muhammad [1 ]
Javed, Abdul Rehman [2 ]
Hassan, Tayyabah [3 ]
Band, Shahab S. [4 ]
Sitharthan, R. [5 ]
Rizwan, Muhammad [3 ]
机构
[1] Abasyn Univ Peshawar, Dept Comp & Technol, Peshawar 25000, Pakistan
[2] Air Univ, Dept Cyber Secur, Islamabad 56300, Pakistan
[3] Women Univ, Kinnaird Coll, Dept Comp Sci, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
[4] Natl Yunlin Univ Sci & Technol, Coll Future, Future Technol Res Ctr, Touliu 64002, Yunlin, Taiwan
[5] Vellore Inst Technol, Sch Elect Engn, Vellore 632014, Tamil Nadu, India
关键词
Routing protocols; Routing; Topology; Ad hoc networks; Network topology; Quality of experience; Energy consumption; Flying ad-hoc networks; unmanned aerial vehicles; green unmanned aerial vehicles communication; routing protocol; Fisheye state routing; Internet of Aerial Vehicles; intelligent transportation system; AD HOC NETWORKS; ROUTING PROTOCOLS; BLOCKCHAIN; EFFICIENT;
D O I
10.1109/TGCN.2022.3157591
中图分类号
TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0809 ;
摘要
The increasing demand for green Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) in civil and military applications has been noticed in the last few decades. As a result, Flying Ad-hoc Networks (FANETs) caught the attention of industries and academia. Due to its exceptional features, it has replaced other traditional networks deployed in all circumstances. However, UAVs have limited resources, and efficient use of these resources is critical for maximizing network lifetime and Quality of Experience (QoE). In this paper, Fisheye State Routing (FSR) protocol is exploited for communication between several UAVs in a topology changing network employing a 3x3 Manhattan grid mobility model. Several network parameters, i.e., packet delivery and drop ratios, end-to-end delay, channel utilization, dropped packet ratio behavior, throughput, jitter, are employed to validate FSR's effectiveness in FANETs. Results analysis is carried out in two different network scenarios with twenty and thirty nodes, respectively. The proposed routing protocol has effectively utilized UAV resources with 46% and 53% packet delivery ratios with maximum channel utilization and throughput over time in both scenarios. Moreover, FSR has 0.010 and 0.253 seconds delay and minimum jitter in twenty and thirty nodes comparatively influential among other routing protocols in end-to-end delay. The proposed approach provides excellent results compared to several other topology-based routing protocols and efficiently utilizes onboard resources.
引用
收藏
页码:1288 / 1297
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] COMMUNICATION SECURITY OF UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES
    He, Daojing
    Chan, Sammy
    Guizani, Mohsen
    IEEE WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS, 2017, 24 (04) : 134 - 139
  • [2] Authentication scheme for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles based Internet of Vehicles networks
    Qureshi, Kashif Naseer
    Sandila, Muhammad Arslan Saleem
    Javed, Ibrahim Tariq
    Margaria, Tiziana
    Aslam, Laeeq
    EGYPTIAN INFORMATICS JOURNAL, 2022, 23 (01) : 83 - 93
  • [3] A Secure Communication Protocol for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles
    Khan, Navid Ali
    Jhanjhi, N. Z.
    Brohi, Sarfraz Nawaz
    Almazroi, Abdulwahab Ali
    Almazroi, Abdulaleem Ali
    CMC-COMPUTERS MATERIALS & CONTINUA, 2022, 70 (01): : 601 - 618
  • [4] Cooperation Techniques for a Cellular Internet of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles
    Zhang, Hongliang
    Song, Lingyang
    Han, Zhu
    Poor, H. Vincent
    IEEE WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS, 2019, 26 (05) : 167 - 173
  • [5] Unmanned Aerial Vehicles in Logistics: Efficiency Gains and Communication Performance of Hybrid Combinations of Ground and Aerial Vehicles
    Patchou, Manuel
    Sliwa, Benjamin
    Wietfeld, Christian
    2019 IEEE VEHICULAR NETWORKING CONFERENCE (VNC), 2019,
  • [6] The Adaptive Communication Network Architecture of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles
    Huang, Xinghe
    Li, Aijing
    Wang, Hai
    2018 IEEE 18TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY (ICCT), 2018, : 251 - 254
  • [7] Internet of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles: QoS Provisioning in Aerial Ad-Hoc Networks
    Kumar, Kirshna
    Kumar, Sushil
    Kaiwartya, Omprakash
    Sikandar, Ajay
    Kharel, Rupak
    Lloret Mauri, Jaime
    SENSORS, 2020, 20 (11)
  • [8] Routing of Two Unmanned Aerial Vehicles with Communication Constraints
    Manyam, Satyanarayana G.
    Rathinam, Sivakumar
    Darbha, Swaroop
    Casbeer, David
    Chandler, Phil
    2014 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS (ICUAS), 2014, : 140 - 148
  • [9] Communication Architectures and Protocols for Networking Unmanned Aerial Vehicles
    Li, Jun
    Zhou, Yifeng
    Lamont, Louise
    2013 IEEE GLOBECOM WORKSHOPS (GC WKSHPS), 2013, : 1415 - 1420
  • [10] More insights into communication issues in the Internet of Vehicles
    Baala, Oumaya
    Boucetta, Cherifa
    Ali, Kahina Ait
    Caminada, Alexandre
    2018 15TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON PERVASIVE SYSTEMS, ALGORITHMS AND NETWORKS (I-SPAN 2018), 2018, : 38 - 45