Priority access to health care: Evidence from an exogenous policy shock

被引:6
|
作者
Yee, Christine A. [1 ,2 ]
Legler, Aaron [1 ,3 ]
Davies, Michael [4 ]
Prentice, Julia [5 ,6 ]
Pizer, Steven [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] VA Boston Healthcare Syst, Partnered Evidence Based Policy Resource Ctr, Boston, MA 02130 USA
[2] Univ Maryland Baltimore Cty, Dept Econ, 1000 Hilltop Circle, Baltimore, MD 21250 USA
[3] Boston Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Boston, MA USA
[4] US Dept Vet Affairs, Off Vet Access Care, Washington, DC USA
[5] VA Boston Healthcare Syst, Ctr Access Policy Evaluat & Res, Boston, MA USA
[6] Boston Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02118 USA
关键词
access to care; prioritization; public health care; resource allocation; wait time; WAITING-TIMES; INSURANCE;
D O I
10.1002/hec.3982
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Access to care is an important issue in public health care systems. Unlike private systems, in which price equilibrates supply and demand, public systems often ration medical services through wait times. Access that is given on a first come, first served basis might not yield an allocation of resources that maximizes the health of a population, potentially creating suboptimal heterogeneity in wait times. In this study, we examine an access disparity between two groups of patients-established patients and new patients. We exploit an exogenous policy change-implemented by the U.S. Veterans Health Administration-that removed the disparity and homogenized the wait time. We find strong evidence that without such a policy, established patients have priority access over new patients. We discuss whether this is a suboptimal allocation of resources. We additionally find that established patient priority access is an important determinant of access for new patients; accounting for it increased the explanatory power of our statistical model of new patient wait times by a factor of five. The findings imply that policy and management decisions may be more effective in achieving the optimal distribution of access if access heterogeneity is recognized and accounted for explicitly.
引用
收藏
页码:306 / 323
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Depression in primary health care: from evidence to policy
    Griffiths, Kathleen M.
    Christensen, Helen
    [J]. MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2008, 188 (08) : S81 - S83
  • [2] Does Health Insurance Premium Exemption Policy for Older People Increase Access to Health Care? Evidence from Ghana
    Duku, Stephen Kwasi Opuku
    van Dullemen, Caroline Elisabeth
    Fenenga, Christine
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGING & SOCIAL POLICY, 2015, 27 (04) : 331 - 347
  • [3] Childhood Immunization and Access to Health Care: Evidence From Nepal
    Devkota, Satis
    Panda, Bibhudutta
    [J]. ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2016, 28 (02) : 167 - 177
  • [4] Policy Responses to Demand for Health Care Access From the Individual to the Population
    Vickery, Katherine Diaz
    Sauser, Kori
    Davis, Matthew M.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2013, 309 (07): : 665 - 666
  • [5] CEO compensation contagion: Evidence from an exogenous shock
    Bereskin, Frederick L.
    Cicero, David C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2013, 107 (02) : 477 - 493
  • [6] Pay for elite private schools or pay for higher housing prices? Evidence from an exogenous policy shock
    Chen, Jing
    Li, Rui
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HOUSING ECONOMICS, 2023, 60
  • [8] Equity of access to health care services: Theory and evidence from the UK
    Goddard, M
    Smith, P
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2001, 53 (09) : 1149 - 1162
  • [9] Introduction: priority setting, equitable access and public involvement in health care
    Weale, Albert
    Kieslich, Katharina
    Littlejohns, Peter
    Tugendhaft, Aviva
    Tumilty, Emma
    Weerasuriya, Krisantha
    Whitty, Jennifer A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEALTH ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT, 2016, 30 (05) : 736 - 750
  • [10] Mandatory universal drug plan, access to health care and health: Evidence from Canada
    Wang, Chao
    Li, Qing
    Sweetman, Arthur
    Hurley, Jeremiah
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2015, 44 : 80 - 96