Trust-based environmental regulation

被引:29
|
作者
Lange, Bettina [2 ]
Gouldson, Andy [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leeds, Sch Earth & Environm, Fac Environm, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Oxford, Ctr Sociolegal Studies, Oxford OX1 3UQ, England
关键词
Environmental regulation; Better regulation; Trust; Implementation; Impact; Regulators; Business; Citizens; PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT; SOCIAL LICENSE; RISK; COOPERATION; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.07.052
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Within this paper, we examine the contribution that trust-based relationships can make to achieving better- and particularly more effective, efficient and equitable-environmental regulation. While levels of trust in regulators, regulatory processes and outcomes are often discussed, the influence of trust on different actors and on different measures of regulatory performance is poorly understood. Within this paper, we define trust-based environmental regulation as a specific regulatory style that involves openness and cooperation in interaction between regulated, regulators and third-party stakeholders in order to achieve environmental protection objectives. We then discuss the pros and cons of trust relationships between regulators, regulated businesses and citizens for achieving behavioural change towards greater environmental protection. To illustrate the significance of these issues, we then examine three forms of contractual regulatory style where trust relationships are critically important: responsive regulation, self-regulation and environmental agreements. Based on this analysis, we highlight the importance of trust-based relationships, and we argue that one of the greatest contributions of trust-based environmental regulation is to challenge how we think about regulation. Trust is often understood as enabling existing regulatory relationships or in the case of self-regulation as a complement to regulation. However, we argue that the real potential of trust is to open up new ways for participants in regulatory regimes to engage in collective action, to go beyond a perception of regulation as driven by the competing interests of individual actors, and thus, to open up new channels of influence for behavioural change towards greater environmental protection. Our analysis therefore has great relevance for future research and for on-going debates on the future of regulation. (C) 2010 Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:5235 / 5243
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] TRUST-BASED MEDICINE
    Nemcekova, Maria
    [J]. HUMAN AFFAIRS-POSTDISCIPLINARY HUMANITIES & SOCIAL SCIENCES QUARTERLY, 2013, 23 (01): : 114 - 116
  • [2] Science, politics and regulation: The trust-based approach to the demarcation problem
    John, Stephen
    [J]. STUDIES IN HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 2021, 90 : 1 - 9
  • [3] Environmental education of the elderly - towards an active, inclusive and trust-based ecosystem
    Przywojska, Justyna
    Podgorniak-Krzykacz, Aldona
    Warwas, I
    [J]. INNOVATION-THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH, 2023, 36 (03) : 453 - 480
  • [4] Trust-Based Security; Or, Trust Considered Harmful
    Singer, Abe
    Bishop, Matt
    [J]. NEW SECURITY PARADIGMS WORKSHOP (NSPW 2020), 2020, : 76 - 89
  • [5] Trust-based belief change
    Lorini, Emiliano
    Jiang, Guifei
    Perrussel, Laurent
    [J]. 21ST EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (ECAI 2014), 2014, 263 : 549 - +
  • [6] Performance of trust-based governance
    Bart S. Vanneste
    Onesun Steve Yoo
    [J]. Journal of Organization Design, 9
  • [7] A Survey on Trust & Trust-Based Schemes In VANETs
    Kavitha, M.
    Tangade, Shrikant S.
    [J]. 2013 FOURTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTING, COMMUNICATIONS AND NETWORKING TECHNOLOGIES (ICCCNT), 2013,
  • [8] Trust-based recommendations for documents
    Hess, Claudia
    Schlieder, Christoph
    [J]. AI COMMUNICATIONS, 2008, 21 (2-3) : 145 - 153
  • [9] The failure of trust-based retributivism
    Korman, D
    [J]. LAW AND PHILOSOPHY, 2003, 22 (06) : 561 - 575
  • [10] TRUST-BASED THEORIES OF PROMISING
    Bruno, Daniele
    [J]. PHILOSOPHICAL QUARTERLY, 2020, 70 (280): : 443 - 463