Comparing Methods of Feature Extraction of Brain Activities for Octave Illusion Classification Using Machine Learning

被引:2
|
作者
Pilyugina, Nina [1 ]
Tsukahara, Akihiko [2 ]
Tanaka, Keita [2 ]
机构
[1] Tokyo Denki Univ, Grad Sch Adv Sci & Technol, Saitama 3500394, Japan
[2] Tokyo Denki Univ, Grad Sch Sci & Engn, Hiki Gun, Saitama 3500394, Japan
关键词
feature selection; machine learning; octave illusion; auditory illusion; MEG; EEG;
D O I
10.3390/s21196407
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to find an efficient method to determine features that characterize octave illusion data. Specifically, this study compared the efficiency of several automatic feature selection methods for automatic feature extraction of the auditory steady-state responses (ASSR) data in brain activities to distinguish auditory octave illusion and nonillusion groups by the difference in ASSR amplitudes using machine learning. We compared univariate selection, recursive feature elimination, principal component analysis, and feature importance by testifying the results of feature selection methods by using several machine learning algorithms: linear regression, random forest, and support vector machine. The univariate selection with the SVM as the classification method showed the highest accuracy result, 75%, compared to 66.6% without using feature selection. The received results will be used for future work on the explanation of the mechanism behind the octave illusion phenomenon and creating an algorithm for automatic octave illusion classification.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparing Efficiency of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Methods for Octave Illusion Classification Using Magnetoencephalography Data
    Pilyugina, N.
    Aizawa, Y.
    Tsukahara, A.
    Tanaka, K.
    [J]. Transactions of Japanese Society for Medical and Biological Engineering, 2021, Annual 59 (Proc): : 650 - 652
  • [2] Machine Learning and Stereoelectroencephalographic Feature Extraction for Brain Tissue Classification
    Lopes, Pedro Henrique Peres Morais
    Machado, Mariana Mulinari Pinheiro
    Voda, Alina
    Besancon, Gildas
    Kahane, Philippe
    David, Olivier
    [J]. IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2021, 54 (15): : 340 - 345
  • [3] Brain Neural Data Analysis Using Machine Learning Feature Selection and Classification Methods
    Bozhkov, Lachezar
    Georgieva, Petia
    Trifonov, Roumen
    [J]. ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF NEURAL NETWORKS (EANN 2014), 2014, 459 : 123 - 132
  • [4] A combination of feature extraction methods and deep learning for brain tumour classification
    Siar, Masoumeh
    Teshnehlab, Mohammad
    [J]. IET IMAGE PROCESSING, 2022, 16 (02) : 416 - 441
  • [5] Feature Extraction and Classification by Machine Learning Methods for Biometric Recognition of Face and Iris
    Oravec, Milos
    [J]. 2014 56TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ELMAR (ELMAR), 2014, : 1 - 4
  • [6] Classification and feature extraction of biological signals using Machine Learning Techniques
    Ciocirlan, Marina
    Udrea, Andreea
    [J]. 2022 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONTROL, DECISION AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES (CODIT'22), 2022, : 780 - 784
  • [7] Machine Learning ECG Classification Using Wavelet Scattering of Feature Extraction
    Marzog, Heyam A. A.
    Abd, Haider. J.
    [J]. APPLIED COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND SOFT COMPUTING, 2022, 2022
  • [8] Feature Extraction for Diseased Leaf Image Classification using Machine Learning
    Nandhini, N.
    Bhavani, R.
    [J]. 2020 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER COMMUNICATION AND INFORMATICS (ICCCI - 2020), 2020, : 258 - 261
  • [9] Feature extraction from MRI ADC images for brain tumor classification using machine learning techniques
    Vijithananda, Sahan M.
    Jayatilake, Mohan L.
    Hewavithana, Badra
    Goncalves, Teresa
    Rato, Luis M.
    Weerakoon, Bimali S.
    Kalupahana, Tharindu D.
    Silva, Anil D.
    Dissanayake, Karuna D.
    [J]. BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING ONLINE, 2022, 21 (01)
  • [10] Feature extraction from MRI ADC images for brain tumor classification using machine learning techniques
    Sahan M. Vijithananda
    Mohan L. Jayatilake
    Badra Hewavithana
    Teresa Gonçalves
    Luis M. Rato
    Bimali S. Weerakoon
    Tharindu D. Kalupahana
    Anil D. Silva
    Karuna D. Dissanayake
    [J]. BioMedical Engineering OnLine, 21