Positive surgical margins at partial nephrectomy: Predictors and oncological outcomes

被引:216
|
作者
Yossepowitch, Ofer
Thompson, R. Houston
Leibovich, Bradley C. [2 ,3 ]
Eggener, Scott E.
Pettus, Joseph A.
Kwon, Eugene D. [2 ,3 ]
Herr, Harry W.
Blute, Michael L. [2 ,3 ]
Russo, Paul [1 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Surg, Sidney Kimmel Ctr Prostate & Urol Canc, Urol Serv, New York, NY 10021 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Dept Urol, Rochester, MN USA
[3] Mayo Clin & Mayo Fdn, Mayo Med Sch, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY | 2008年 / 179卷 / 06期
关键词
kidney neoplasms; nephrectomy; neoplasm recurrence; local; neoplasm metastasis;
D O I
10.1016/j.juro.2008.01.100
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: The prognostic significance and optimal management of positive surgical margins following partial nephrectomy remain ill-defined. We combine data from 2 tertiary care intuitions, and report predictors of positive surgical margins and long-term oncological outcomes for patients with positive surgical margins. Materials and Methods: Clinical, pathological and followup, data on 1,344 patients undergoing 1,390 partial nephrectomies for kidney cancer were analyzed. Patients with positive surgical margins on final pathology were treated expectantly. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression models were fit to determine clinicopathological features associated with positive surgical margins. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate freedom from local disease recurrence and metastatic progression. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess whether positive surgical margin predicted local recurrence or metastatic disease adjusting for tumor size, pathological stage, histological subtype and presence of a solitary kidney. Results: Positive surgical margins were documented in 77 cases (5.5%). Decreasing tumor size and presence of a solitary kidney carried a significantly higher risk of positive surgical margins. The overall 10-year probability of freedom from local disease recurrence was 93% (95% CI 89, 95) and from metastatic progression 93% (95% CI 90, 95), with no significant difference between patients with positive vs negative margins (p = 0.97 and 0.18, respectively). Positive surgical margins were not associated with an increased risk of local recurrence or metastatic disease. Conclusions: Positive surgical margins in partial nephrectomy specimens do not uniformly portend an adverse prognosis. While every effort should be taken to ensure clear margins, our data suggest that select patients with a positive surgical margin can be safely offered vigilant monitoring without compromising long-term disease-free survival.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:2158 / 2163
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGINS AFTER PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY FOR RENAL CELL CARCINOMA: PREDICTORS AND IMPACT ON ONCOLOGICAL OUTCOMES
    Bansal, Rahul
    Kapoor, Anil
    Finelli, Antonio
    Rendon, Ricardo
    Moore, Ron
    Breau, Rodney
    Lacombe, Louis
    Kawakami, Jun
    Drachenberg, Darrel
    Black, Peter
    Pautler, Stephen
    Liu, Zhihui
    Tanguay, Simon
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 191 (04): : E545 - E545
  • [2] Oncological outcomes of positive surgical margins in partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma.
    Nonemacher, Henrique T. S.
    Cordeiro, Mauricio
    De Albuquerque, George Lins
    Galucci, Fabio
    de Carvalho, Paulo Afonso
    Borges, Leonardo
    Guglielmetti, Giuliano Betuni
    Bastos, Diogo Assed
    Coelho, Rafael
    Sarkis, Alvaro
    Dzik, Carlos
    Nahas, William Carlos
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 35
  • [3] PREDICATIVE FACTORS AND ONCOLOGICAL OUTCOMES OF POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGINS FOLLOWING PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY- WITH AN EMPHASIS ON SURGICAL EXPERIENCE
    Abu-Ghanem, Yasmin
    Dotan, Zohar
    Kaver, Issac
    Zilberman, Dorit
    Fridman, Edi
    Ramon, Jacob
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 203 : E323 - E323
  • [4] ONCOLOGICAL OUTCOMES OF POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGINS IN PATIENTS WHO UNDERWENT PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY FOR RENAL CELL CARCINOMA
    Jesus, Vinicius Menezes
    dos Anjos, Gabriel Carvalho
    Barros, Guilherme Garcia
    Cho, David Hamilton
    Jahchan Alves, Gabriel Kledeglau
    de Carvalho, Paulo Afonso
    Cardili, Leonardo
    Galucci, Fabio Pescarmona
    Pontes Junior, Jose
    Coelho, Rafael Ferreira
    Nahas, William Carlos
    Cordeiro, Mauricio Dener
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 211 (05): : E250 - E251
  • [5] Oncologic outcomes for patients with positive surgical margins at partial nephrectomy
    Thompson, R. Houston
    Yossepowitch, Ofer
    Leibovich, Bradley C.
    Eggener, Scott E.
    Pettus, Joseph A.
    Kwon, Eugene D.
    Herr, Harry W.
    Blute, Michael L.
    Russo, Paul
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 179 (04): : 479 - 479
  • [6] ONCOLOGICAL OUTCOMES OF POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGINS IN PATIENTS WHO UNDERWENT PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY FOR RENAL CELL CARCINOMA.
    Nonemacher, Henrique
    Cordeiro, Mauricio
    de Albuquerque, George Lins
    Brunhara, Joao
    Carvalho, Paulo Afonso
    Gallucci, Fabio
    Borges, Leornardo
    Coelho, Rafael
    Patel, Vipul
    Nahas, Willian
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 197 (04): : E961 - E962
  • [7] Positive surgical margins after partial nephrectomy
    Sascha Pahernik
    Markus Hohenfellner
    Nature Reviews Urology, 2010, 7 : 240 - 242
  • [8] Positive surgical margins after partial nephrectomy
    Pahernik, Sascha
    Hohenfellner, Markus
    NATURE REVIEWS UROLOGY, 2010, 7 (05) : 240 - 242
  • [9] Impact of Positive Surgical Margins After Partial Nephrectomy
    Mendes Carvalho, Joao Andre
    Nunes, Pedro
    Tavares-da-Silva, Edgar
    Parada, Belmiro
    Jarimba, Roberto
    Moreira, Pedro
    Retroz, Edson
    Caetano, Rui
    Sousa, Vitor
    Cipriano, Augusta
    Figueiredo, Arnaldo
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY OPEN SCIENCE, 2020, 21 : 41 - 46
  • [10] IMPACT OF POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGINS AFTER PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY
    Carvalho, Joao
    Nunes, Pedro
    Jarimba, Roberto
    Tavares-da-Silva, Edgar
    Antunes, Hugo
    Parada, Belmiro
    Moreira, Pedro
    Retroz, Edson
    Caetano, Rui
    Sousa, Vitor
    Cipriano, Maria
    Figueiredo, Arnaldo
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 201 (04): : E833 - E833